Team:Ehime-Japan/Modeling
From 2012.igem.org
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1. | The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1. | ||
<p/> | <p/> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/a/ac/%E7%84%A1a%E9%A1%8C.png"> |
+ | |||
<p><font size="5"><p/> | <p><font size="5"><p/> | ||
<p><Discussion><p/> | <p><Discussion><p/> |
Revision as of 03:33, 27 September 2012
Introduction
In our experiment of the E.co-mail, the important thing is to degrade GFP-Lon-tag more rapidly. GFP is usually stable and has a long half–life. So, we thought of how to measure the reaction rate.
Method
The relative light intensity values are summarized in Table 1. As we can only obtain relative values as intensity of light, we set the value for the 0-hour sample as 1.
Because there is the propotional relationship between light intensity and GFP concentration, we made a graph of this and took collinear approximation. Besides considering parameter, three is this approximation straight line is primary rate equation.
(d [GFP-Lon tag])/dt = -k1 [GFP-Lon tag][Lon-LVA]
(d [Lon-ClpXP])/dt = -k2 [Lon – LVA][LVA] +Lon synthesis rate