Team:TU-Eindhoven/LEC/LabTheory

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
<br />
<br />
<h3>Chassis</h3>
<h3>Chassis</h3>
-
<p>Before this light emitting cell display project could start, it was necessary to decide on a suitable chassis.  Candidates were E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Both are common model organisms that can be used for protein expression and are cheap to culture. To reach the goal of this project expression of <span class= "lightblue">voltage-gated calcium channel</span> is needed, which luckily is already the case for S. cerevisiae. Therefore, it was decided to use S. cerevisiae as our chassis throughout the project. More specifically, we used the <span class= "lightblue">INVSc1 yeast strain</span> which is compatible with the choice of vectors. Additional benefits when using yeast is that there are still only a <span class= "lightblue">few BioBricks</span> available, which creates a greater opportunity to contribute to the Registry, but also the drawback of having less biobricks available to ourselves. Another benefit is that, at the moment, the manipulation of yeast is <span class= "lightblue">less standardized</span> than it is for E. coli, which ultimately means that our research is <span class= "lightblue">more innovative</span>.</p>
+
<p>Before this light emitting cell display project could start, it was necessary to decide on a suitable chassis.  Candidates were E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Both are common model organisms that can be used for protein expression and are cheap to culture. To reach the goal of this project expression of <span class= "lightblue">voltage-gated calcium channel</span> is needed, which luckily is already the case for S. cerevisiae. Therefore, it was decided to use S. cerevisiae as our chassis throughout the project. More specifically, we used the <span class= "lightblue">INVSc1 yeast strain</span> which is compatible with the choice of vectors. Additional benefits when using yeast is that there are still only a <span class= "lightblue">few BioBricks<sup>TM</sup></span> available, which creates a greater opportunity to contribute to the Registry, but also the drawback of having less BioBricks<sup>TM</sup> available to ourselves. Another benefit is that, at the moment, the manipulation of yeast is <span class= "lightblue">less standardized</span> than it is for E. coli, which ultimately means that our research is <span class= "lightblue">more innovative</span>.</p>
<br />
<br />
<h3>Plasmids and transformations</h3>
<h3>Plasmids and transformations</h3>

Latest revision as of 01:24, 27 September 2012