Team:TU-Eindhoven/LEC/Modelling

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 77: Line 77:
<p>
<p>
[[File:kinchar.png|380px]]
[[File:kinchar.png|380px]]
-
<align="right">
 
<i> (Click to enlarge) </i>
<i> (Click to enlarge) </i>
-
</align>
+
 
</p>
</p>
<br>
<br>
Line 123: Line 122:
<p>
<p>
-
As we could not yet accomplish a complete sensitivity analysis on the model, we only consider the basic characteristics of the different parts of the model. Furthermore, the influences of some basic experimental setup values are stated, i.e. the concentration of extracellular calcium, Ca<sub>{ex}</sub>, and the duration of the pulse.  
+
As we could not yet accomplish a complete sensitivity analysis on the model, we only consider the basic characteristics of the different parts of the model. Furthermore, the influences of some basic experimental setup values could be stated, i.e. the concentration of extracellular calcium, Ca<sub>{ex}</sub>, and the duration of the pulse.  
</p>
</p>
-
As shown in figure \ref{pic:1a}, the basic model for calcium homeostasis in yeast cells shows an oscillatory system. As a result of the increase of the cytosolic $Ca^{2+}$-level, the concentrations $[CaM]$ and $[CaN]$ also increase, since calmodulin and calcineurin bind to calcium. Due to the negative feedback system caused by the protein Vcx1, the cytosolic $Ca^{2+}$-level decreases after obtaining a maximum value. This maximum value seems to be constant in time. In figure \ref{pic:1b}, a different initial value of the cytosolic $Ca^{2+}$ level is used, $20 \mu M$ instead of $10 \mu M$ in figure \ref{pic:1a}. This initial value does not seem to influence the overall values of the final state.
 
-
The concentration of $[Ca^{2+}]_{ex}$, however, does influence the behavior of the oscillation. In table \ref{tab: oscillatory period} the different times for one period of oscillation are shown. Looking at these values, it is shown that the decrease of this parameter has approximately the an increasing effect on the oscillation time of the system.
+
<p>
-
 
+
[[File:res3.png]][[File:res4.png]]
-
Furthermore, we need to look into the results of the complete model, including the kinetics of the GECO-proteins and the characteristics of the voltage-dependent calcium channels. In figures \ref{pic:2a} and \ref{pic:2b} multiple pulses are shown, with different duration times. During the pulse, the calcium concentration increases and therefore also the concentrations of CaGECO and CaM. On the other hand, $[Crz]$ turns out to be constant in time and therefore no oscillatory system can be observed. After the pulse, the calcium concentration decreases remarkably fast, while the concentration of the GECO-calcium complex decreases much slower, as expected.
+
</p>
-
 
+
<p>
-
Looking at the results of the model in more detail, fig. \ref{pic:2c}, with a pulse duration of one second, the different influences of the specific parts of the model can be made more clear. Since the calcium level increases as a response to the pulse, both calmodulin and the GECO-protein will bind to calcium. Therefore, both $[CaM]$ and $[CaGECO]$ will reach their maximum. Next to it, the graphs of $[CaN]$ show clear influences of $[CaM]$. This is caused by the fact that calcineurin binds to calcium-bounded calmodulin.
+
[[File:res6.png]][[File:res7.png]]
 +
</p>
-
When a shorter opening time of the calcium channels is modeled, fig \ref{pic:2c}, almost the same $Ca^{2+}$-level is reached. When the opening time of the calcium channels is reduced even more (fig. \ref{pic:2d}, \ref{pic:2e}), the $[Ca^{2+}]$-level does not reach the same maximum anymore. Both calmodulin and the GECO-protein are in total bounded to $[Ca^{2+}]$. Since this is only for a short duration, $[CaN]$ does not reach same level as for larger opening times. The figures \ref{pic:2c}, \ref{pic:2d} and \ref{pic:2e} however have a similar shape when it comes to the decrease of $[CaGECO]$, since the same maximum of $[CaGECO]$ is reached.
 
<h3>
<h3>

Revision as of 15:33, 25 September 2012