Team:TU Munich/Project/Thaumatin

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Results)
(→Thaumatin)
Line 4: Line 4:
<hr/>
<hr/>
[[File:gruppe_thaumatin_TUM12.jpg|350px|thumb||Responsible: Martin Schappert and Alois Bräuer]]
[[File:gruppe_thaumatin_TUM12.jpg|350px|thumb||Responsible: Martin Schappert and Alois Bräuer]]
-
"'''Why'''? O WHY???" is the reaction we usually face when we tell our friends, that we '''genetically engineer yeast to secrete a sweetener'''."Kruzifixnochemol" is another, more cryptic one.  
+
"'''Why'''? O WHY???" is the reaction we usually face when we tell our friends, that we '''genetically engineer yeast to secrete a sweetener'''. "Kruzifixnochemol" is another, more cryptic one.  
<br>We must admit, even we don't think that a "Münchner Hell" or a "Pils" would benefit from the distinct sweetness of Thaumatin, originally produced by ''Thaumacoccus daniellii''.  
<br>We must admit, even we don't think that a "Münchner Hell" or a "Pils" would benefit from the distinct sweetness of Thaumatin, originally produced by ''Thaumacoccus daniellii''.  
<br>So, why, o why have we chosen Thaumatin? There are a '''variety of arguments''' that have to be taken into consideration:
<br>So, why, o why have we chosen Thaumatin? There are a '''variety of arguments''' that have to be taken into consideration:

Revision as of 13:26, 12 September 2012

Contents

Thaumatin

Responsible: Martin Schappert and Alois Bräuer

"Why? O WHY???" is the reaction we usually face when we tell our friends, that we genetically engineer yeast to secrete a sweetener. "Kruzifixnochemol" is another, more cryptic one.
We must admit, even we don't think that a "Münchner Hell" or a "Pils" would benefit from the distinct sweetness of Thaumatin, originally produced by Thaumacoccus daniellii.
So, why, o why have we chosen Thaumatin? There are a variety of arguments that have to be taken into consideration:

  • Since experiments in the 1980ies, nobody tried to express Thaumatin via S. Cerevisiae - so we saw the possibility to enhance the production and make it more efficient (as one of the biggest problems for industrial use of Thaumatin so far is the low yield efficiency) by codon usage optimization.
  • If you think of the beers of the Anglo-Saxon world - stouts, ales - these are the sorts that could directly profit from the licorice-like sweetness, as they are generally more full-bodied and show a variety of caramel flavors.
  • It opens the world of brewage to a whole new generation of lifestyle drinks - perhaps a bit too innovative for the conservative german beer market, but nevertheless there's quite a potential there for cutting-edge beverages with the soul of beer and the savor of all the fruits you can imagine. Thaumatin might serve as a low-carb ingredient to balance out the bitter and sour flavors of guava, grapefruits, currant - or even horseradish.

Background and principles

Picture taken from: PDB; ID: 2VHK

Thaumatin is a natural α+β-protein which is synthesized by the katamfe plant (Thaumatococcus daniellii) – a species of tropical flowering plants - and belongs to the thaumatin-like protein family. There exist different varieties of thaumatin, however, thaumatin I und thaumatin II are well characterized and differ only in one position (position 46 – without signaling sequence; thaumatin I Asn; thaumatin II Lys). Both are said to be 2000 to 100000 times sweeter than sucrose on molar basis, but the sweetness builds slow and lasts long.

Thaumatin is a single chain with 207 amino acids residues and eight disulfide bonds and a molecular weight of 22.2 kDa. It is highly water soluble, stable at heating (not for cooking, bakery, etc.) and stable under acidic conditions. The production of thaumatin is induced by an attack upon the plant by viroid pathogens. Thus it is involved in systematically acquired resistance and stress response.

Thaumatin has been approved as a sweetener in the European Union (E957).

The molecular and physiological effects of thaumatin

The sweet taste receptor is a heterodimeric receptor composed of T1R2 (also TAS1R2) and T1R3 (also TAS1R3) subunits. The large amino-terminal domains (NTD) of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits have shown to be responsible for the primary ligand binding (E. Maitrepierre et al. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22450161). In addition these receptors have a transmembrane heptahelical domain. T1R receptors belong to the family of class C G-Protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which in this case means that through ligand binding an elevation of the cAMP concentration in the taste buds is induced (N. Ide et al.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=19489607; M. Ozeck et al. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15087236). As a result a decrease in the intracellular cAMP accumulation is measured. Released calcium (Ca2+) seems to be another independent second messenger within the transduction of the taste response (downstream of taste receptors) (KR. Trubey et al; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=16510847).

However, not only sucralose or other sugars can bind with the NTDs of the sweet taste receptor, but also thaumatin (N. Ide et al. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=19489607). It seems to have a longer lasting and stronger effect than sucralose.

Idea

The general idea is to create via genetic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a system that expresses thaumatin, respectively the direct precursor (preprothaumatin). The N-terminal "pre" part is the internal signalling sequence for secretion, the C-terminal "pro" sequence supports the correct and functional folding of thaumatin. Alternatively one could have used a fusion product of prothaumatin and the Mat-alalalalalpha-factor to achieve secretion.

Preferable seems to be the natural preprothaumatin, because of the expected higher yield (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=High-yield Secretion of the Recombinant Sweet-Tasting Protein Thaumatin I) and the possibility that the pre-sequence is necessary for the correct procession (Ide et al.,Effects of pre- and pro-sequence of thaumatin on the secretion by Pichia pastoris; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=17897626). A similar construct was used by the Kyoto University (Ide et al., submitted) in Pichia pastoris with a the pPIC6α expression vector with a high yield (especially with the preprothaumatin I gene and without the α-factor secretion signal).

To achieve the highest possible yield, we optimized the original gene sequence for best yeast codon usage (via GeneArt® GeneOptimizer®).

Remarks

Proof of principle

  • First of all the existence of the preprothaumatin I / thaumatin I gene within the gene construct (via the Gal10-promotor in pYES2) needs to be proved (via control digest and sequencing)
  • Thaumatin expression and secretion is detected via SDS-Page of the supernatant
  • Purification: Ion exchange chromatography and mass spectrometry

Results

  • Control digest pYes2_Preprothaumatin...:

TUM12 20120824 pYes2 Preporthau final.jpg

  • Annotated gene sequence, pYes2_Preprothaumatin.
  • Picture of colonies.
  • SDS-PAGE.
  • IEX.
  • MS.

References

Reviews (PMID)

Others

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Munich/Project/Thaumatin"