"
Team:TU Munich/Project/Safety
From 2012.igem.org
(→iGEM Questioniare) |
(→iGEM Questioniare) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*researcher safety, | *researcher safety, | ||
| - | no | + | no |
*public safety, or | *public safety, or | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 30 August 2012
Safety
iGEM Questioniare
1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
- researcher safety,
no
- public safety, or
ingredients for the beer are either accepted additives
- environmental safety?
by genetically engineering yeast we alleviate the need for genetically modified plants as sources for ingredients
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,
- did you document these issues in the Registry?
- how did you manage to handle the safety issue?
- How could other teams learn from your experience?
Xanthohumol / Limonene / Caffeine
gefahrenstoffkennzeichnungen, but expression levels should be way below critical concentrations
Thaumatin
accepted additive
3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
- If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
- If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?
Every department at TU Munich needs a safety delegate. who is this, did we talk to him?
The lab we work in is classified as BSL 1 (biosafety level 1), according to the European Union Directive 2000/54/EG and the German "Gesetz zur Regelung der Gentechnik (GenTG)" ([http://bundesrecht.juris.de/gentsv/index.html law for the regulation of genetic engineering], text in German only). There is a total of four Biosafety levels, with BSL 1 being the lowest and BSL 4 being the highest.
Work inside a BSL 1 lab, such as ours, involves no devices that are potentially harmful to the researchers if they act corresponding to the general precautionary measures. Especially, no pathogenic organisms are used, as the bacterial strains in our lab do not possess mechanisms necessary for survival outside of the lab, or in the human body.
4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
