Team:NTNU Trondheim/Criteria
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|rowspan="4"|1 | |rowspan="4"|1 | ||
|Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part. | |Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part. | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended. | |The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended. | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | | Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system. | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation. | |Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation. | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 14:27, 20 July 2012