Team:University College London/Week12YanikaExp6

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
{| class ="bigtable"
{| class ="bigtable"
|-
|-
-
! !! LIGATIONS !! !! !! !! !! CONTROLS !! !! !! !!
+
! !! LIGATIONS: !! 1 !! 2 !! 4 !! 5 !! CONTROLS !! 1 !! 2 !! 4 !! 5  
-
|-
+
-
| - || || 1 || 2 || 4 || 5 || || 1 || 2 || 4 || 5
+
|-
|-
|dH2O || || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || || 4.5 || 4.5 || 4.5 || 4.5
|dH2O || || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || || 4.5 || 4.5 || 4.5 || 4.5

Latest revision as of 22:06, 26 September 2012

Analytical were prepared as per the following recipes in order to confirm DNA identity. Ligations 1, 2, 4, 5 correspond to the purified DNA described above. In addition, four controls were used for each digest. A sample was cut with one enzyme in order to linearise the DNA.


LIGATIONS: 1 2 4 5 CONTROLS 1 2 4 5
dH2O 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
NEB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DNA 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
BSA 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
XBal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SpeI 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10