"
Team:TU Munich/Results/Medal Criteria
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Nadine1990 (Talk | contribs) (→Gold) |
Nadine1990 (Talk | contribs) (→Gold) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.</i></li> | ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.</i></li> | ||
<li>Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</li> | <li>Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</li> | ||
| - | [https://igem.org/Team.cgi?id=801| => See | + | [https://igem.org/Team.cgi?id=801| => See our RFC]<br> |
<li>Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.</li></ol> | <li>Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.</li></ol> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 26 September 2012
Contents |
Medal Criteria
Bronze
- Team registration => See our registration
- Complete Judging form
- Team Wiki
- Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
- At least one new submitted and well-characterized standard BioBrick Part or Device. A new application of and outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry also counts.
=> See our sendbox
=> See an example for a designed, characterized BioBrick
=> See an expamle for an existing BioBrick that has been rated
Silver
- Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
- Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
Gold
- Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part.
The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended. - Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
- Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.
