Team:St Andrews/metal-binding
From 2012.igem.org
MPLockhart (Talk | contribs) |
(Added vector image modal, cleaned up code.) |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<p>The second route would produce a protein that would act as a general metal scavenging protein. gBlocks (≤ 500 bps) were specifically designed and inserted into a pGEX-6P-1. One of them was designed to bind toxic metals: cadmium, mercury and cobalt (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007). This was done by inserting flexible linkers between the metal binding sites (Hu, Wang et al. 2007). This prevented hairpins in the structure. The second gBlock designed was for precious metals, not including platinum and palladium. The corresponding gene sequences specific for gold, silver, aluminum and titanium peptides (Seker, Demir 2011) were used. The design of this differed from the other gBlock as myoglobin was hijacked, the loops removed and replaced with our metal binding peptides. </p> | <p>The second route would produce a protein that would act as a general metal scavenging protein. gBlocks (≤ 500 bps) were specifically designed and inserted into a pGEX-6P-1. One of them was designed to bind toxic metals: cadmium, mercury and cobalt (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007). This was done by inserting flexible linkers between the metal binding sites (Hu, Wang et al. 2007). This prevented hairpins in the structure. The second gBlock designed was for precious metals, not including platinum and palladium. The corresponding gene sequences specific for gold, silver, aluminum and titanium peptides (Seker, Demir 2011) were used. The design of this differed from the other gBlock as myoglobin was hijacked, the loops removed and replaced with our metal binding peptides. </p> | ||
- | + | ||
<section id="synthesizing-metal-binding-peptides"> | <section id="synthesizing-metal-binding-peptides"> | ||
- | |||
<h2>Synthesizing Metal Binding Proteins</h2> | <h2>Synthesizing Metal Binding Proteins</h2> | ||
- | |||
<p>For detail on our laboratory procedures, please refer to our <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:St_Andrews/Lab-book">Protocols</a>. | <p>For detail on our laboratory procedures, please refer to our <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:St_Andrews/Lab-book">Protocols</a>. | ||
<p>Sequences were found for metal binding peptides. The gene sequences for the production of the metal binding peptides were very short. Therefore we were able to have each peptide gene synthesised as two complementary oligonucleotides. We then annealed the primers together. The product of this reaction had the relevant sticky ends for insertion of the sequence into the plasmid vector. </p> | <p>Sequences were found for metal binding peptides. The gene sequences for the production of the metal binding peptides were very short. Therefore we were able to have each peptide gene synthesised as two complementary oligonucleotides. We then annealed the primers together. The product of this reaction had the relevant sticky ends for insertion of the sequence into the plasmid vector. </p> | ||
- | + | ||
<h3>Short metal binding peptides</h3> | <h3>Short metal binding peptides</h3> | ||
<h3>Primers</h3> | <h3>Primers</h3> | ||
Line 144: | Line 142: | ||
<h3>Vector</h3> | <h3>Vector</h3> | ||
- | |||
<div class="row-fluid"> | <div class="row-fluid"> | ||
- | + | <div class="span4"> | |
- | + | <a href="#modal-vector" data-toggle="modal" class="thumbnail"> | |
- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/78/450px-PGEX-6P-1.jpg" alt="" /> | |
- | + | </a> | |
- | + | </div> | |
- | + | <div class="span6"> | |
- | < | + | <p>Our vector of choice was pGEX-6p-1, as it contains the genetic information needed to produce GST (258, 992) and is ampicillin-resistant.</p> |
- | <p>Our vector of choice was pGEX-6p-1, as it contains the genetic information needed to produce GST (258, 992) and is ampicillin-resistant. </p> | + | |
<p>pGEX was digested with EcoR1(955) and Xho1(970). </p> | <p>pGEX was digested with EcoR1(955) and Xho1(970). </p> | ||
- | </ | + | </div> |
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
<p>The primers designed to create our short Ni1, Ni2, Pd and Pt binding inserts were annealed. </p> | <p>The primers designed to create our short Ni1, Ni2, Pd and Pt binding inserts were annealed. </p> | ||
<p>The primer dimers were ligated into the cut pGEX vector on the N terminus of GST. </p> | <p>The primer dimers were ligated into the cut pGEX vector on the N terminus of GST. </p> | ||
Line 169: | Line 164: | ||
<p>GST+ Ni1 and Ni2 were used to prove functionality in our engineered protein. They bound to nickel beads successfully, and further characterisation was carried out by the University Geology department using their Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. </p> | <p>GST+ Ni1 and Ni2 were used to prove functionality in our engineered protein. They bound to nickel beads successfully, and further characterisation was carried out by the University Geology department using their Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. </p> | ||
<p>The Pd and Pt constructs were not fully characterised . </p> | <p>The Pd and Pt constructs were not fully characterised . </p> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | |||
<h3>gBlocks</h3> | <h3>gBlocks</h3> | ||
<p>Two gBlocks were designed and ordered from IDT. </p> | <p>Two gBlocks were designed and ordered from IDT. </p> | ||
Line 458: | Line 454: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- Modals --> | ||
+ | <div class="modal large hide" id="modal-vector"> | ||
+ | <div class="modal-header"> | ||
+ | <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal">×</button> | ||
+ | <h3>Figure zoom: <em>pGEX-6P-1 vector</em></h3> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="modal-body"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/78/450px-PGEX-6P-1.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <!-- End modals --> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{:Team:St_Andrews/Template:Footer}} | {{:Team:St_Andrews/Template:Footer}} |
Revision as of 09:23, 26 September 2012
Metal binding protein
Introduction
Precious and toxic metals frequently find their way into the environment. As their names suggest, such leaks are wasteful and damaging respectively. St Andrews iGEM '12 plans to take on this challenge using synthetic biology.
Project Description
Our project was inspired by the work done identifying the platinum and palladium particles present on roads, primarily emitted from catalytic converters (Deplanche et al. 2011). In 2010, 50% of the world's platinum and palladium production was used for catalytic converters, with the largest use in Europe (Jollie 2010). Platinum and palladium appear on road surfaces in small concentrations and in minute particles, < 3 μm (Prichard, Fisher 2012). These precious elements are a finite resource! However, their eventual exhaustion can be postponed by collecting and recycling them.
We have focused on the collection process. We have worked in a similar way to Chung et al, in that we have produced a protein with a metal binding peptide on the N-terminus of an easily expressible protein (Chan Chung, Cao et al. 2008). The difference is that we used glutathione S-transferase (GST tag) rather than ubiquitin, and instead of adding the binding peptide chemically to the protein we expressed both the protein and the peptide in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. These cells are particularly suited to large scale protein production. The peptides sequences were taken from various sources (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007) and codon optimised for E. coli. The nucleotide sequence that code for the peptides were modified so they could be produced by E. coli using an online program Protein to DNA.
We decided to go down two different routes. The first was making an array of proteins that bind specific metals, and the second was to make a protein with multiple metal binding sites for multiple metals.
With the first of the two ideas we thought that it would be possible use a column to immobilise the protein by its GST tag. A solution containing multiple metal ions would then be passed through the column, which would bind each metal ion specifically. Initially, we decided to take a look at palladium, platinum and nickel (Seker, Demir 2011). The reason for choosing these metals was twofold: firstly, because platinum and palladium are particularly precious metals, which provides an economic argument; and secondly, because nickel columns were readily available to test this idea.
The second route would produce a protein that would act as a general metal scavenging protein. gBlocks (≤ 500 bps) were specifically designed and inserted into a pGEX-6P-1. One of them was designed to bind toxic metals: cadmium, mercury and cobalt (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007). This was done by inserting flexible linkers between the metal binding sites (Hu, Wang et al. 2007). This prevented hairpins in the structure. The second gBlock designed was for precious metals, not including platinum and palladium. The corresponding gene sequences specific for gold, silver, aluminum and titanium peptides (Seker, Demir 2011) were used. The design of this differed from the other gBlock as myoglobin was hijacked, the loops removed and replaced with our metal binding peptides.
Synthesizing Metal Binding Proteins
For detail on our laboratory procedures, please refer to our Protocols.
Sequences were found for metal binding peptides. The gene sequences for the production of the metal binding peptides were very short. Therefore we were able to have each peptide gene synthesised as two complementary oligonucleotides. We then annealed the primers together. The product of this reaction had the relevant sticky ends for insertion of the sequence into the plasmid vector.
Short metal binding peptides
Primers
All primers are notated 5' to 3'.