Team:St Andrews/metal-binding
From 2012.igem.org
MPLockhart (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 391: | Line 391: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h2>Biobricks</h2> | <h2>Biobricks</h2> | ||
- | <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925002">BBa_K925002</a></ | + | <table class="table table-striped"> |
- | <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part: | + | <thead> |
- | <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part: | + | <tr> |
- | <a href=""> | + | <th>Biobrick</th> |
- | <a href=""> | + | <th>Short name</th> |
+ | <th>Description</th> | ||
+ | <th>Length</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </thead> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925002">BBa_K925002</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>HisTagGST</td> | ||
+ | <td>This part codes for glutathione S-transferase (GST) protein with a histidine tag attached to the end. This provides a double ended tag protein and proof that the concept of attaching small metal binding peptides to the end of GST can create a protein with two active binding sites. This part is fully characterised.</td> | ||
+ | <td>669</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925004">BBa_K925004</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>NiTagGST</td> | ||
+ | <td>This part codes for GST and has a alternative nickel binding peptide attached to the end of the protein. This double ended protein binds to both GST and to nickel and is fully characterised.</td> | ||
+ | <td>681</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925005">BBa_K925005</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>PdTagGST</td> | ||
+ | <td>This part codes for GST with a palladium binding peptide attached to the end of the protein. The part is not yet characterised.</td> | ||
+ | <td>666</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925005">BBa_K925005</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>My Precious </td> | ||
+ | <td>This part codes for a gBlock that was designed by hijacking the structure of myoglobin and replacing the loops of the structure with precious metal binding peptides. The part was designed to bind gold, silver, aluminium and titanium. The part is not yet characterised.</td> | ||
+ | <td>479</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K925007">BBa_K925007</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>My Toxic </td> | ||
+ | <td>This part codes for a gBlock that was designed by building flexible linker sequences around peptide binding sequences for toxic metals. The part was intended to scavenge cobalt, cadmium and mercury. The part is not yet characterised.</td> | ||
+ | <td>888</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 25 September 2012
Metal binding protein
Introduction
Precious and toxic metals frequently find their way into the environment. As their names suggest, such leaks are wasteful and damaging respectively. St Andrews iGEM '12 plans to take on this challenge using synthetic biology.
Project Description
The human race moved from the stone of the Neolithic period and into the metallurgy of the Chalcolithic period with the widespread use of metal tools in their every day work regime (Gale 1991). Metals are still a massive part of our everyday lives, but in quantities that dwarf previous usage. These high levels of metal requirements have left the landscape scarred.
Our project was inspired by the work done identifying the platinum and palladium particles present on roads, primarily emitted from catalytic converters (Deplanche et al. 2011). In 2010, 50% of the world's platinum and palladium production was used for catalytic converters, with the largest use in Europe (Jollie 2010). Platinum and palladium appear on road surfaces in small concentrations and in minute particles, < 3 μm (Prichard, Fisher 2012). These precious elements are a finite resource! However, their eventual exhaustion can be postponed by collecting and recycling them.
We have focused on the collection process. We have worked in a similar way to Chung et al, in that we have produced a protein with a metal binding peptide on the N-terminus of an easily expressible protein (Chan Chung, Cao et al. 2008). The difference is that we used glutathione S-transferase (GST tag) rather than ubiquitin, and instead of adding the binding peptide chemically to the protein we expressed both the protein and the peptide in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. These cells are particularly suited to large scale protein production. The peptides sequences were taken from various sources (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007) and codon optimised for E. coli. The nucleotide sequence that code for the peptides were modified so they could be produced by E. coli using an online program Protein to DNA.
We decided to go down two different routes. The first was making an array of proteins that bind specific metals, and the second was to make a protein with multiple metal binding sites for multiple metals.
With the first of the two ideas we thought that it would be possible use a column to immobilise the protein by its GST tag. A solution containing multiple metal ions would then be passed through the column, which would bind each metal ion specifically. Initially, we decided to take a look at palladium, platinum and nickel (Seker, Demir 2011). The reason for choosing these metals was twofold: firstly, because platinum and palladium are particularly precious metals, which provides an economic argument; and secondly, because nickel columns were readily available to test this idea.
The second route would produce a protein that would act as a general metal scavenging protein. gBlocks (≤ 500 bps) were specifically designed and inserted into a pGEX-6P-1. One of them was designed to bind toxic metals: cadmium, mercury and cobalt (Seker, Demir 2011, Bae, Chen et al. 2000, Song, Caguiat et al. 2004, White, Liljestrand et al. 2007). This was done by inserting flexible linkers between the metal binding sites (Hu, Wang et al. 2007). This prevented hairpins in the structure. The second gBlock designed was for precious metals, not including platinum and palladium. The corresponding gene sequences specific for gold, silver, aluminum and titanium peptides (Seker, Demir 2011) were used. The design of this differed from the other gBlock as myoglobin was hijacked, the loops removed and replaced with our metal binding peptides.
Synthesizing Metal Binding Proteins
For detail on our laboratory procedures, please refer to our Protocols.
Sequences were found for metal binding peptides. The gene sequences for the production of the metal binding peptides were very short. Therefore we were able to have each peptide gene synthesised as two complementary oligonucleotides. We then annealed the primers together. The product of this reaction had the relevant sticky ends for insertion of the sequence into the plasmid vector.
Short metal binding peptides
Primers
All primers are notated 5' to 3'.