Team:Wageningen UR/Journal/week21

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(week 21: 17 September - 23 September)
Line 11: Line 11:
But for put the TuYV constructs atfer the IPTG induced promoter, we tried anohter two times, still we did not get the expected results.  
But for put the TuYV constructs atfer the IPTG induced promoter, we tried anohter two times, still we did not get the expected results.  
-
----
 

Revision as of 17:00, 25 September 2012

= week 21: 17 September - 23 September

TuYV and Polero

Polero: The VLP sameple from last week was tested by EM this week, but unfortunately, we did not find the polero VLP under EM.


TuYV: this week we did the conony PCR test for TuYV construct 1, 1H, 4 and 4H in the chloramphenical backbone plate colony, after several times trying we finally get the satisfing results. And the sequencing results confirmed all the seven samples we send out have the right inserts.

But for put the TuYV constructs atfer the IPTG induced promoter, we tried anohter two times, still we did not get the expected results.


Hepatitis B inside modification



  • Colony PCR of Hepatitis B core protein behing an IPTG promoter in pSB1C3 backbone with sequencing primers

-> the gel shows fragments of the expected size (about 1kb)


GFP modification


17 September


  • ligation of the PCR products from 14 September (mixing the duplo samples together) with pJET and transformation with JM109


19 September

  • colony PCR of the transformation from 17 September (with pJET sequencing primers)

Figure 1: Colony PCR 19 September


20 September

  • miniprep 2 colonies of the GFP-coil and 2 colonies of the GFP-coil with a His tag transformants from the Colony PCR
  • Digestion check of these minipreps

-> shows the expected fragment sizes for all the samples

  • sent 1 sample of the GFP-coil and 1 sample of the GFP-coil with the His tag for sequencing
  • Digestion of both GFP-coil construct, pSB1C3 and Bba_J04500

-> the backbone yields after purification where too low. A new culture was grown to obtain new minipreps of the backbones.


21 September

  • Digestion and ligation of both GFP-coil constructs into pSB1C3 and Bba_J04500
  • Transformation with JM109


22 September

  • Colony PCR of the transformations from 21 September

-> all samples showed the expected fragment sizes

Figure 2: Colony PCR 22nd september GFP E-coil


23 September

-> despite the positive result the day before, a lot of colonies on the plates containing the GFP-constructs ligated with pSB1C3 turned red. Since we used BBa_J04450 (containing RFP framed by pre- and suffix) to obtain the backbone this means that the transformation was only succesfull with a few colonies and the Colony PCR from 22 September might be faulty

  • The colony PCR from 22 September was repeated
Figure 3: Colony PCR 22 September; GFPcoil constructs in Bba_J04500 using forward primer annealing to the coil and sequencing backward primer

Figure 4: Colony PCR 22 September; GFPcoil constructs in pSB1C3 using sequencing primer </p>

-> The GFP-coil with the His tag in pSB1C3 samples showed 2 positive results. The other construct in this backbone showed a very vague fragment at the expected size -> Some samples of colonies containing GFP-coil constructs in Bba_J04500 showed frament sizes of the expected size (arrows)

  • two of each sample in each backbone where grown and miniprepped


CCMV coil addition


Frame shift in coil addition After receiving our samples from the sequencing, we saw that there was a frame shift in the sequence, leading to the faulty translation of the CCMV delta 25 coat protein, with an early stop codon.

Faulty Intended
BP sequence

GTTTCTTCGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGATGAAGATAGCGG CGTTGAAGGAGAAAATCGCAGCACTAAAAGAAAAGATAGCG GCGTTGAAGGAGCTTGGTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTGGTGGTTC TGCTGCTGCTGTGTGGTCCAACCTGTTATTGTAGAACCCAT CGCTTCAGGCCAAGGCAAGGCTATTAAAGCATGGACCGGTT ACAGCGTATCGAAGTGGACCGCCTCTTGTGCGGCTGCCGAA GCTAAAGTAACCTCGGCTATAACTATCTCTCTCCCTAATGA GCTATCGTCCGAAAGGAACAAGCAGCTCAAGGTAGGTAGAG TTTTATTATGGCTTGGGTTGCTTCCCAGTGTTAGTGGCACA GTGAAATCCTGTGTTACAGAGACGCAGACTACTGCTGCTGC CTCCTTTCAGGTGGCATTAGCTGTGGCCGACAACTCGAAAG ATGTTGTCGCTGCTATGTACCCCGAGGCGTTTAAGGGTATA ACCCTTGAACAACTCACCGCGGATTTAACGATCTACTTGTA CAGCAGTGCGGCTCTCACTGAGGGCGACGTCATCGTGCATT TGGAGGTTGAGCATGTCAGACCTACGTTTGACGACTCTTTC ACTCCGGTGTAT

GTTTCTTCGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGATGAAGATAGCGG CGTTGAAGGAGAAAATCGCAGCACTAAAAGAAAAGATAGCG GCGTTGAAGGAGCTTGGTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTGGTGGTTC TGCTGCTGCTGGTGTGGTCCAACCTGTTATTGTAGAACCCA TCGCTTCAGGCCAAGGCAAGGCTATTAAAGCATGGACCGGT TACAGCGTATCGAAGTGGACCGCCTCTTGTGCGGCTGCCGA AGCTAAAGTAACCTCGGCTATAACTATCTCTCTCCCTAATG AGCTATCGTCCGAAAGGAACAAGCAGCTCAAGGTAGGTAGA GTTTTATTATGGCTTGGGTTGCTTCCCAGTGTTAGTGGCAC AGTGAAATCCTGTGTTACAGAGACGCAGACTACTGCTGCTG CCTCCTTTCAGGTGGCATTAGCTGTGGCCGACAACTCGAAA GATGTTGTCGCTGCTATGTACCCCGAGGCGTTTAAGGGTAT AACCCTTGAACAACTCACCGCGGATTTAACGATCTACTTGT ACAGCAGTGCGGCTCTCACTGAGGGCGACGTCATCGTGCAT TTGGAGGTTGAGCATGTCAGACCTACGTTTGACGACTCTTT CACTCCGGTGTAT

Primer FW1 FL-Delta26

TGGTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTGGTGGTTCTGCTGCTGC TGTGTGGTCCAACCTGTTATTGTAG

TGGTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTGGTGGTTCTGCTGCTGC

TGGTGTGGTCCAACCTGTTATTGTAG

Translation product (AA)

MKIAALKEKIAALKEKIAALKELGGGSGGGGSAAAVWSNLLL

MKIAALKEKIAALKEKIAALKELGGGSGGGGSAAAGVVQPVI VEPIASGQGKAIKAWTGYSVSKWTASCAAAEAKVTSAITISL PNELSSERNKQLKVGRVLLWLGLLPSVSGTVKSCVTETQTTA AASFQVALAVADNSKDVVAAMYPEAFKGITLEQLTADLTIYL YSSAALTEGDVIVHLEVEHVRPTFDDSFTPVY

The new primer is ordered to still make this part available for the registry, but submission before the wiki deadline will not be possible anymore. however, we think that iGEM should not be the only reason to deliver bricks, and we intend to deliver all bricks that did not make it just in time, still after the iGEM deadlines.



[previous week]