Team:Wageningen UR/Coil system

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(PnAS)
(The Plug and Apply (PnA) System)
Line 43: Line 43:
Despite their proven functionality in cell-cell adhesion both coils are cloned into a BBa_197038 plasmid backbone. This backbone is very unusual for iGEM standard registry parts and is not compatible with either of the other cloning standards. Being aware of this we decided to clone the KILR-coil into a standard 10 plasmid backbone with chloramphenicol resistence to allow following iGEM teams to easily work with the Berkeley coils.  
Despite their proven functionality in cell-cell adhesion both coils are cloned into a BBa_197038 plasmid backbone. This backbone is very unusual for iGEM standard registry parts and is not compatible with either of the other cloning standards. Being aware of this we decided to clone the KILR-coil into a standard 10 plasmid backbone with chloramphenicol resistence to allow following iGEM teams to easily work with the Berkeley coils.  
 +
== Using the Parts Registry ==
 +
The parts registry already contains both ligands and epitopes which can be attached to the VLPs using the PnA system
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: left"
 +
|- style="font-style: bold"
 +
|Epitopes
 +
|Author
 +
|URL
 +
|Type
 +
|Status
 +
|-
 +
|V5 epitope tag tail domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST)
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2018
 +
|proteindomain/affinity
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|V5 epitope tag head domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST)
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2019
 +
|proteindomain/affinity
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|V5 epitope tag special internal domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST)
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2020
 +
|proteindomain/affinity
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|VSV-G epitope tag tail domain (YTDIEMNRLGK)
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2021
 +
|proteindomain/affinity
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|VSV-G epitope tag special internal domain (YTDIEMNRLGK)
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2022
 +
|proteindomain/affinity
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|ITGA4 - B epitope
 +
|QGEM_09
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K214003
 +
|Null
 +
|Available
 +
|- style="font-style: bold"
 +
|Ligands
 +
|Author
 +
|URL
 +
|Type
 +
|Status
 +
|-
 +
|Delta-mCherry Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock
 +
|Grant Robinson
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511302
 +
|Null
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|Delta-mCherry-4xFF4 Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock
 +
|Grant Robinson
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511303
 +
|Null
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|Stem cell factor (SCF) or c-kit-ligand
 +
|David Charoy
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K292009
 +
|Null
 +
|Available
 +
|-
 +
|{SH3 ligand}
 +
|John Dueber
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62002
 +
|Null
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|{SH3 ligand}
 +
|John Dueber
 +
|http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62003
 +
|Null
 +
|Planning
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|Reshma Shetty
 +
|
 +
|Null
 +
|Planning
 +
|}
 +
''table 2 Overview of epitopes and ligands from the parts registry''
----
----

Revision as of 10:38, 19 September 2012

Contents

The Plug and Apply (PnA) System

E- and K-coil

fig. 1 homodimeric GCN4 leucine zipper

A big challenge of our project is the attachment of ligands and functional proteins on either the outside or inside of a virus-like particle (VLP). We decided to use a noncovalent anchor-like system, which consists of two different coiled-coil proteins. For various experiments the E-/K-coil combination IAAL E3 and IAAL K3 reported by Litowksi et al. in 2002 was used.

α-helical coiled-coils represent an widely abundant but simple oligomerization motif in proteins. They have an enormous diversity of functions in nature ranging from motor proteins to transcription factors and chaperones [1]. Coiled-coils are comprised of one single secondary protein structure: the α-helix. Their quaternary structure is stable and does not unfold in aqueous solution at a neutral pH unlike other peptide α-helices. One of the striking structural features of the coiled coils is their build-up of two to five α-helices. These helices contain a heptad repeat of mainly apolar amino acids which is denoted as (abcdefg)^n in literature. The letters a and d are usually amino acids with a highly hydrophobic side chain. The side chains are packed against each other forming a hydrophobic core which allows the formation of a supercoil. Whereas the letter n is representing the number of helices in the final coil. The helices can be identical or even different in sequence and may be aligned in a parallel/antiparallel way. The amino acids of the letters e and g have typically charged residues to allow electrostatic interactions with other peptides (most importantly other coils)[2]. The process of dimerization is largely dependent on the peptide sequence and can be homodimeric (fig 1.) or heterodimeric (e.g. E- and K-coil). In our project we are utilizing heterodimeric coiled-coils to noncovalently attach proteins. This system is advantageous because of the high stability and specificity. The use of heterodimeric coils additionally prevents the self-dimerization of either the virus capsid monomer or the protein ( or ligand) of choice.


fig. 2 cross-section view of a E-/ K-coil heterodimer


In fig. 2 the chemical interactions of a E- and K-coil pair are shown, unfortunately not the pair we have used in the course of our experiments. The wide white arrows depict the interhelical hydrophobic interactions (hydrophobic core)[2]. The thin arrows display the electrostatic attractions of the two coils on each other. As mentioned before these electrostatic interactions are caused by the amino acids present on position e and g. In this case glutamic acid (E) and lysine (K). All these interactions greatly contribute to the stability and the prevention of self-dimerization. The correct amino acid sequence of the coil pair IAAL E3 and IAAL K3, which we have implemented in our experiments is stated in table 1[2]. The choice of this pair was made to have a reasonably short coil with only 3 heptad repeats to avoid interference with the quaternary structure of the capsid proteins.

name peptide sequence
gabcdefgabcdefgabcdef
IAAL E3 Ac-EIAALEKEIAALEKEIAALEK-NH2
IAAL K3 Ac-KIAALKEKIAALKEKIAALKE -NH2

table 1 amino acid sequence of the chosen pair of coils (in one letter amino acid code)


In an effort to reduce the amount of laboratory work it was decided to fuse the different capsid proteins of the VLPs with the K-coil only. We designed experiments to add the K-coil to capsid proteins of the Turnip yellows virus (TuYV), the Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) and to Hepatitis B (HepB) by fusion PCR (for more information see prject pages). Possible ligands and other proteins of interest are fused with the E-coil. In this way the GFP - E-coil construct for example is of universal use with either of the 3 different viruses.

fig. 3 E-coil with a short linker attached to a GFP-molecule


Berkeley coils

Next to the E-/K-coil combination we are searching for suitable alternatives. We found the EILD/ KILR coils made by UC Berkeley, which are already present in the Standard parts registry of iGEM (BBa_K197021 and BBa_K197022). Both coils are GNC4 leucine zippers which can form homo- and heterodimers. The 2009 iGEM Berkeley wetlab team used this properties to show cell-cell adhesion of E.coli cells, if the coils are present on the cell surface (fig.4) [3].


fig. 4 cell-cell adhesion using coiled-coils


Despite their proven functionality in cell-cell adhesion both coils are cloned into a BBa_197038 plasmid backbone. This backbone is very unusual for iGEM standard registry parts and is not compatible with either of the other cloning standards. Being aware of this we decided to clone the KILR-coil into a standard 10 plasmid backbone with chloramphenicol resistence to allow following iGEM teams to easily work with the Berkeley coils.

Using the Parts Registry

The parts registry already contains both ligands and epitopes which can be attached to the VLPs using the PnA system

Epitopes Author URL Type Status
V5 epitope tag tail domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2018 proteindomain/affinity Planning
V5 epitope tag head domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2019 proteindomain/affinity Planning
V5 epitope tag special internal domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2020 proteindomain/affinity Planning
VSV-G epitope tag tail domain (YTDIEMNRLGK) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2021 proteindomain/affinity Planning
VSV-G epitope tag special internal domain (YTDIEMNRLGK) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2022 proteindomain/affinity Planning
ITGA4 - B epitope QGEM_09 http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K214003 Null Available
Ligands Author URL Type Status
Delta-mCherry Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock Grant Robinson http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511302 Null Planning
Delta-mCherry-4xFF4 Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock Grant Robinson http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511303 Null Planning
Stem cell factor (SCF) or c-kit-ligand David Charoy http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K292009 Null Available
{SH3 ligand} John Dueber http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62002 Null Planning
{SH3 ligand} John Dueber http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62003 Null Planning
Reshma Shetty Null Planning

table 2 Overview of epitopes and ligands from the parts registry



  • 1. Minten, I.J., et al., Controlled encapsulation of multiple proteins in virus capsids. J Am Chem Soc, 2009. 131(49): p. 17771-3.
  • 2. Litowski, J.R. and R.S. Hodges, Designing heterodimeric two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils. Effects of hydrophobicity and alpha-helical propensity on protein folding, stability, and specificity. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(40): p. 37272-9.
  • 3. Aguado, G.G.L. Part: BBa_K197022 KILR. 2009 [09/17/2012]; Available from: http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K197022.