Cre-Lox

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(February)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 46: Line 46:
==March==
==March==
-
'''3/8/2012'''
+
===3/8/2012===
1.Cre PCR? It hasn’t worked on the gel yet
1.Cre PCR? It hasn’t worked on the gel yet
Line 99: Line 99:
-
3/10/2012
+
===3/10/2012===
Then we ran both restriction digests on the gel:
Then we ran both restriction digests on the gel:
Line 112: Line 112:
-
'''3/13/2012'''
+
===3/13/2012===
1.We need to locate the bacteria with the cre gene in it-  this way we can purify the plasmid and start the PCR process over again since it has not worked thus far
1.We need to locate the bacteria with the cre gene in it-  this way we can purify the plasmid and start the PCR process over again since it has not worked thus far
Line 132: Line 132:
For vector-only: 3 μL ddH<sub>2</sub>O
For vector-only: 3 μL ddH<sub>2</sub>O
-
'''3/15/2012'''
+
===3/15/2012===
1. Cre- Dr. Grose located the template from Dr. Griffitts lab (PJG577). It is freshly plated so we will incubate it over night (37 degrees) and it should be ready to purify tomorrow to get the Cre PCR going again.  
1. Cre- Dr. Grose located the template from Dr. Griffitts lab (PJG577). It is freshly plated so we will incubate it over night (37 degrees) and it should be ready to purify tomorrow to get the Cre PCR going again.  
Line 153: Line 153:
Plate 100ul of cells and incubate 37 degrees overnight
Plate 100ul of cells and incubate 37 degrees overnight
-
'''3/16/2012'''
+
===3/16/2012===
'''[[Colony PCR:]]'''
'''[[Colony PCR:]]'''
Line 177: Line 177:
Then added 2 μL of the boiled Lox-transformed samples.
Then added 2 μL of the boiled Lox-transformed samples.
-
'''3/20/2012'''
+
===3/20/2012===
LOX: Today we ran a gel from the LOX colonies which were transformed. It ought to be 130BP+however many BP LOX is which will indicate that the insert is present. If the insert is not present then the results of the purified/opened up DNA will only show 130bp which is the size of only the multiple cloning site. The first column after the ladder is the colony that seems to have taken up the lox insert because it is 130BP+.  
LOX: Today we ran a gel from the LOX colonies which were transformed. It ought to be 130BP+however many BP LOX is which will indicate that the insert is present. If the insert is not present then the results of the purified/opened up DNA will only show 130bp which is the size of only the multiple cloning site. The first column after the ladder is the colony that seems to have taken up the lox insert because it is 130BP+.  
Line 185: Line 185:
CRE: Since we grew the cre we streaked out from Dr. Griffitts lab last week we purified - we were able to use that as a template today to run our PCR which we will need to run on a gel Thursday 3/22/2012.
CRE: Since we grew the cre we streaked out from Dr. Griffitts lab last week we purified - we were able to use that as a template today to run our PCR which we will need to run on a gel Thursday 3/22/2012.
-
'''3/22/2012'''
+
===3/22/2012===
Cre was run out on the following lanes: look in audrey's notebook
Cre was run out on the following lanes: look in audrey's notebook
Line 192: Line 192:
-
'''3/27/2012'''
+
===3/27/2012===
CRE: The gel above shows that our Cre PCR did not work - we need to discuss with Dr. Grose why our PCR is still disfunctional. We are not sure where the template came from that Dr. Grose gave us.  
CRE: The gel above shows that our Cre PCR did not work - we need to discuss with Dr. Grose why our PCR is still disfunctional. We are not sure where the template came from that Dr. Grose gave us.  
Line 223: Line 223:
-
'''3/29/2012'''
+
===3/29/2012===
Lox gel: today we ran a gel with the new 8 colonies we were testing for the transformed plasmid. It doesn't look like any of the colonies worked. *Ours are the first 8 wells after the ladder on the bottom row. The efficency is still very low, something probably went bad with the restriction digest. We took the FIRST colony that worked from the FIRST gel we ran that worked and are now isolating the plasmid in the overnight at 37 degrees and we need to purify it tomorrow. (they are labeled BLANK and BLANK 1-1. The Blank 1-1 should be foggy and has the plasmid in it). They have the date 3.22.12 labelled on them.  
Lox gel: today we ran a gel with the new 8 colonies we were testing for the transformed plasmid. It doesn't look like any of the colonies worked. *Ours are the first 8 wells after the ladder on the bottom row. The efficency is still very low, something probably went bad with the restriction digest. We took the FIRST colony that worked from the FIRST gel we ran that worked and are now isolating the plasmid in the overnight at 37 degrees and we need to purify it tomorrow. (they are labeled BLANK and BLANK 1-1. The Blank 1-1 should be foggy and has the plasmid in it). They have the date 3.22.12 labelled on them.  
Line 231: Line 231:
[[Image:03-29-12_lox_colony_run_and_cholera.tif‎|300x450px]]
[[Image:03-29-12_lox_colony_run_and_cholera.tif‎|300x450px]]
-
'''3/29/2012'''
+
===3/29/2012===
Pelleted the bacteria with the lox and froze it in the Colon Cancer box.
Pelleted the bacteria with the lox and froze it in the Colon Cancer box.
Line 237: Line 237:
==April==
==April==
-
'''4/28/2012''' (HE and EJ)
+
===4/28/2012===  
 +
(HE and EJ)
Lox: today we did Plasmid miniprep kit. LABELLED PURIFIED LOX PLASMID. (it is in the e.coli box in the freezer)  
Lox: today we did Plasmid miniprep kit. LABELLED PURIFIED LOX PLASMID. (it is in the e.coli box in the freezer)  
Line 256: Line 257:
Cre: we are still currently trying to attain the actual sequence for the PJG577 Cre gene from Dr. Griffitts lab to check our primers.
Cre: we are still currently trying to attain the actual sequence for the PJG577 Cre gene from Dr. Griffitts lab to check our primers.
-
'''4/30/2012''' (EJ and HE)
+
===4/30/2012===
 +
(EJ and HE)
Lox: We need to determine what the construct of lox is so that we can have it sequenced by adding:
Lox: We need to determine what the construct of lox is so that we can have it sequenced by adding:
Line 265: Line 267:
Cre: Dr. Griffitts lab is still looking for the cre sequence. They have not been able to find the sequence for the PJG577 and so they are going to continue to look for that and email it to us when they find it. Until then we are unable to make any progress with Cre
Cre: Dr. Griffitts lab is still looking for the cre sequence. They have not been able to find the sequence for the PJG577 and so they are going to continue to look for that and email it to us when they find it. Until then we are unable to make any progress with Cre
-
 
-
 
==May==
==May==
-
'''5/1/2012'''
+
===5/1/2012===
EJ
EJ
Line 302: Line 302:
-
'''5/4/2012 The best day so far.'''
+
===5/4/2012===
 +
The best day so far.
HE and EJ
HE and EJ
Line 309: Line 310:
Lox: We got the [[lox plasmid sequence]] back from the sequencing lab. We checked for similarities between the sequence and the lox term lox sequence and found a good match (E=0). So we are confident that lox got cloned in!!!!!!!!! Hurray!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lox: We got the [[lox plasmid sequence]] back from the sequencing lab. We checked for similarities between the sequence and the lox term lox sequence and found a good match (E=0). So we are confident that lox got cloned in!!!!!!!!! Hurray!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
'''5/7/2012 The day after the best day so far.'''
+
===5/7/2012===
 +
The day after the best day so far.'''
HE EJ KN
HE EJ KN
Line 338: Line 340:
Once we PCR amplify this gene, we can clone it into the Lox plasmid that we have created.
Once we PCR amplify this gene, we can clone it into the Lox plasmid that we have created.
-
'''5/8/2012''' EJ and HE
+
===5/8/2012===  
 +
EJ and HE
Analysis of PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis:
Analysis of PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis:
Line 354: Line 357:
-
'''5/11/2012''' HE and EJ
+
===5/11/2012===
 +
HE and EJ
Reran the Cre PCR and then run it out on a gel.
Reran the Cre PCR and then run it out on a gel.
Line 364: Line 368:
-
'''5/15/2012''' HE and EJ
+
===5/15/2012===
 +
HE and EJ
Ran the gel with CC and C3 again and:
Ran the gel with CC and C3 again and:
Line 402: Line 407:
The Cre gene is now ready for restriction digest. We will also perform restriction digest on our Lox plasmid so that we can clone the Cre gene into the Lox plasmid.
The Cre gene is now ready for restriction digest. We will also perform restriction digest on our Lox plasmid so that we can clone the Cre gene into the Lox plasmid.
-
'''5/16/2012''' HE
+
===5/16/2012===  
-
 
+
HE
[[Image:Hillary and Josh 5-16.tif|300x450px]]
[[Image:Hillary and Josh 5-16.tif|300x450px]]
Line 409: Line 414:
We ran our cre on a normal gel and the last two wells in the picture above are the results of cre. As you can see above now our plans are to purify our cre plasmid and then do a restriction digest on both cre and lox to put them together.
We ran our cre on a normal gel and the last two wells in the picture above are the results of cre. As you can see above now our plans are to purify our cre plasmid and then do a restriction digest on both cre and lox to put them together.
-
'''5/18/2012''' HE
+
===5/18/2012===
 +
HE
We purified the cre PCR and it is in the colon cancer box labelled "PURIFIED DNA CRE 5/18/2012"
We purified the cre PCR and it is in the colon cancer box labelled "PURIFIED DNA CRE 5/18/2012"
Line 418: Line 424:
-
'''5/21/2012''' HE
+
===5/21/2012===
 +
HE
Figured out what enzymes are necessary for the Restriction digest and low-melt gel (HindIII HF and PstI)
Figured out what enzymes are necessary for the Restriction digest and low-melt gel (HindIII HF and PstI)
-
'''5/22/2012''' HE
+
===5/22/2012===
 +
HE
Did restriction digest on the purified cre DNA as well as the purified lox DNA. labelled the tubes Vector lox RD and PCR Prd. Cre RD. Used the previously mentioned enzymes (HindIII and PstI) After incubating them for 1.5 hours at 37C and letting making the low-melt gel, I inserted in this order to the wells  
Did restriction digest on the purified cre DNA as well as the purified lox DNA. labelled the tubes Vector lox RD and PCR Prd. Cre RD. Used the previously mentioned enzymes (HindIII and PstI) After incubating them for 1.5 hours at 37C and letting making the low-melt gel, I inserted in this order to the wells  
Line 432: Line 440:
We have another tube of Cre PCR that was ran on the gel and worked, so we need to purify that PCR product, do a restriction digest, and run it on a low-melt gel again. I put the low-melt gel product from lox in the freezer (yellow container) and it is labelled "lox 5/22"
We have another tube of Cre PCR that was ran on the gel and worked, so we need to purify that PCR product, do a restriction digest, and run it on a low-melt gel again. I put the low-melt gel product from lox in the freezer (yellow container) and it is labelled "lox 5/22"
-
'''5/29/2012''' EJ and KN
+
===5/29/2012===
 +
EJ and KN
Because Cre did not work, we needed to do the PCR again. Hopefully this will be the final time.
Because Cre did not work, we needed to do the PCR again. Hopefully this will be the final time.
Line 461: Line 470:
-
'''5/30/2012''' HE
+
===5/30/2012===
 +
HE
Ran the PCR product out on a regular gel: It was as follows from well 1-well 5  LADDER CC5  C5-1  C5-2  C6-3  There was a band in all 4 of the PCR product wells, including the control. I talked to Jordan about why this would be, because we had a band in our control last time as well, and he said it could be contaminated reagents. (some DNA was added to the reagents and that is what we see) He said that that is a possibility but highly unlikely. We are going to go forward with these results and if we don't have any product in our low-melt again then we will go ahead and run the PCR again with all new/different reagents to illuminate contamination potentials.
Ran the PCR product out on a regular gel: It was as follows from well 1-well 5  LADDER CC5  C5-1  C5-2  C6-3  There was a band in all 4 of the PCR product wells, including the control. I talked to Jordan about why this would be, because we had a band in our control last time as well, and he said it could be contaminated reagents. (some DNA was added to the reagents and that is what we see) He said that that is a possibility but highly unlikely. We are going to go forward with these results and if we don't have any product in our low-melt again then we will go ahead and run the PCR again with all new/different reagents to illuminate contamination potentials.
Line 469: Line 479:
==June==
==June==
-
'''6/4/2012''' EJ and HE
+
===6/4/2012===
 +
EJ and HE
'''PCR Cleanup'''
'''PCR Cleanup'''
Line 506: Line 517:
-
'''6/5/2012''' HE and EJ
+
===6/5/2012===
 +
HE and EJ
'''Ligation'''
'''Ligation'''
Line 542: Line 554:
-
'''6/5/2012''' EJ
+
===6/5/2012===
 +
EJ
'''Colony PCR'''  
'''Colony PCR'''  
Line 549: Line 562:
-
'''6/11/2012''' EJ
+
===6/11/2012===
 +
EJ
Set up the '''Taq PCR''' reaction:
Set up the '''Taq PCR''' reaction:
Line 567: Line 581:
-
'''6/12/2012''' HE
+
===6/12/2012===  
 +
HE
[[Image:CreLox Hillary 6-12.jpg|300x450px]]
[[Image:CreLox Hillary 6-12.jpg|300x450px]]
Line 578: Line 593:
-
'''6/18/2012'''
+
===6/18/2012===
PCR amplify Cre gene
PCR amplify Cre gene
Line 606: Line 621:
-
'''6/19/2012'''
+
===6/19/2012===
'''PCR Cleanup'''
'''PCR Cleanup'''
Line 652: Line 667:
we also didn't get any results for the overnight and so we need to take those out tomorrow.  
we also didn't get any results for the overnight and so we need to take those out tomorrow.  
-
'''6/20/12'''
+
===6/20/12===
Take out the overnight!  
Take out the overnight!  
-
'''6/21/12'''
+
===6/21/12===
well... we tried to start the ligation, but soon realized that it wasn't a low-melt gel that was used and so we are not able to melt the gel to ligate them. So we started the cre PCR again and also purified the Lox plasmids so we can have more to work with when we get back to the low-melt step again.  
well... we tried to start the ligation, but soon realized that it wasn't a low-melt gel that was used and so we are not able to melt the gel to ligate them. So we started the cre PCR again and also purified the Lox plasmids so we can have more to work with when we get back to the low-melt step again.  
Line 663: Line 678:
-
'''6/27/2012''' EJ
+
===6/27/2012===
 +
EJ
Dr. Grose got back the sequencing results for Lox again. We looked to see where it cloned in, and it was not between the cut sites we expected it to be. How in the world it got somewhere else we have no idea. It's really strange. Take home message is that we need to re-clone lox into our plasmid. Since we already have Cre PCR'd and ready to go we may as well clone that into a new plasmid, and then get lox into the plasmid. Let's do it!
Dr. Grose got back the sequencing results for Lox again. We looked to see where it cloned in, and it was not between the cut sites we expected it to be. How in the world it got somewhere else we have no idea. It's really strange. Take home message is that we need to re-clone lox into our plasmid. Since we already have Cre PCR'd and ready to go we may as well clone that into a new plasmid, and then get lox into the plasmid. Let's do it!
Line 684: Line 700:
-
'''6/28/2012''' EJ and HE
+
===6/28/2012===
 +
EJ and HE
Hillary re-PCR'd Cre and purified it.
Hillary re-PCR'd Cre and purified it.
Line 727: Line 744:
Poured a low melt gel to run out the Cre on as soon as the RD is finished. Put it in the refrigerator for use tomorrow.
Poured a low melt gel to run out the Cre on as soon as the RD is finished. Put it in the refrigerator for use tomorrow.
-
 
==July==
==July==
-
'''7/2/2012'''
+
===7/2/2012===
We ran the lox PCR out on a gel and then did the PCR cleanup, unfortunately neither of them worked out! So we are running the PCR again:  
We ran the lox PCR out on a gel and then did the PCR cleanup, unfortunately neither of them worked out! So we are running the PCR again:  
Line 775: Line 791:
-
'''7/3/2012''' EJ
+
===7/3/2012===
 +
EJ
'''Colony PCR'''
'''Colony PCR'''
Line 794: Line 811:
-
'''7/5/2012'''
+
===7/5/2012===
Ran my TAQ PCR out on a gel. My lanes were the ones in the middle of the gel. I loaded ladder, wells 1-8, and then the control. Here is a picture:
Ran my TAQ PCR out on a gel. My lanes were the ones in the middle of the gel. I loaded ladder, wells 1-8, and then the control. Here is a picture:
Line 819: Line 836:
-
'''7/10/2012'''
+
===7/10/2012===
Boiled template for Cre. This was done with bacteria pJG125.
Boiled template for Cre. This was done with bacteria pJG125.
Line 849: Line 866:
-
'''7/16/2012'''
+
===7/16/2012===
It appears that the Cre transformation worked!
It appears that the Cre transformation worked!
Line 880: Line 897:
-
'''7/26/2012'''
+
===7/26/2012===
This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct.
This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct.
Line 892: Line 909:
I labelled the tube "L" and the control "LC". They are in the PCR machine. Next step is to do a gel.
I labelled the tube "L" and the control "LC". They are in the PCR machine. Next step is to do a gel.
 +
 +
==August==
 +
 +
===August 26, 2012===
 +
 +
Cloning Cre-Lox.:
 +
Background: The Cre-lox system must first be cloned into an inducible promoter
 +
(PBAD) and checked for function before it is used in our final construct where it
 +
will be placed under the Sox/thermosensor promoter and shine-delgarno. First,
 +
Cre will be cloned into plasmid PBAD/pLAT and then GFP downstream from
 +
PCON-LOX-GENT-TERM-LOX (a constitutive promoter followed by a lox site,
 +
gentamycin resistance cassette, a terminator, and another lox site). When cre is not
 +
transcribed, the cells will be gentamycin resistant and also GFP negative. When Cre
 +
is transcribed, the cells will be gentamycin sensitive but GFP positive since the DNA
 +
between the LOX sites will be removed.
 +
 +
The Cre gene was PCR amplified using primers BI 155 and BI 156 and cloned into
 +
the PBAD/pLAT plasmid that last year’s iGEM team made (pIG13 )so that it would
 +
be inducible by the pBAD promoter.
 +
 +
BI155: ggcctgcagaggaggttaattaATGTCCAATTTACTGACCGTAC
 +
"""This is the forward Cre primer. For use with BI156.this primer contains the PstI
 +
site, followed by a SD and then the first 24 bp of Cre (including the ATG). To be used
 +
with BI156 to amplify cre from the Joel Griffitts plasmid pJG125.
 +
 +
BI156: ggcaagcttCTA GTC GCC ATC TTC CAG CAG
 +
Cre Reverse with HIndIII site and STOP
 +
 +
A phusion PCR was setup as follows:
 +
 +
20 uL HF buffer
 +
3 uL dNTP’s
 +
3 uL each primer
 +
1 uL template DNA (pJG125 from the Joel Griffitts lab – source of Cre)
 +
69 uL of ddH20
 +
1 uL Phusion polymerase
 +
 +
===August 27, 2012===
 +
Cre PCR was run on gel and verified as ~800 bp. It was then digested along with
 +
pIG13 with as follows:
 +
 +
5 uL buffer 4
 +
0.5 uL BSA
 +
42 uL insert or plasmid
 +
1.5 uL each restriction enzyme (PstI/HindIII)
 +
 +
August 28, 2012
 +
Digested Cre insert and pIG13 were run on gel and the correct bands were seen
 +
(800 bp and 3500 bp respectively) and cut out of the gel, then ligated as follows:
 +
 +
1.5 DNA ligase buffer
 +
6 uL H20
 +
1.5 uL DNa ligase
 +
3 uL of insert and 3 uL of plasmid
 +
 +
Ligations were allowed to set on the desk for 1 hour, then were transformed into
 +
DH5alpha by the heat shock protocol and plated on LB-AMP.
 +
 +
===August 29,2012===
 +
Colony PCR of putative clones: used primers BI155 and BI156 along with boiled
 +
colonies from the transformation plate to check for inserts. We got 100% cloning
 +
efficiency (see gel). We started 5 mL overnights in LB-AMP for plasmid purification
 +
(colonies #2 and #3).
 +
 +
==September==
 +
 +
===Sept. 3, 2012===
 +
 +
We did plasmid preps using the Sigma miniprep kit according to manufacturers
 +
protocols. We also set-up Phusion PCR for the Pcon-Lox-Gent-Term-LoxP- cassette
 +
using primers BI133 and BI84 and the template from Joel Griffitt’s lab (pJG181).
 +
 +
BI133 Lox reverse CCGgagctcATTGGATCCATAACTTCGTATAATG (SalI )
 +
This is the pConLoxTermLox Reverse primer. It has the SacI restriction cut site,
 +
instead of SalI restriction site like IG86. SacI, the restriction site on this primer, is
 +
the correct cut site. (used with the vector from Dr. Griffitts lab - pJG181)
 +
 +
BI84 PCon-Lox-gentamycin-terminator-Lox forward (HindIII)
 +
ccgAAGCTTtttacggctagctcagtcctaggtatagtgctagcCATAACTTCGTATAGCATACATTATA
 +
HindIII pCon lox term lox forward. I checked for restriction sites in pCon lox term
 +
lox. There are no HindIII, salI, EcoRI, SpeI or xbaI!
 +
 +
20 uL HF buffer
 +
3 uL dNTP’s
 +
3 uL each primer
 +
1 uL template DNA (pJG181 from the Joel Griffitts lab – source of Cre)
 +
69 uL of ddH20
 +
1 uL Phusion polymerase
 +
 +
===Sept. 4, 2012===
 +
We ran the phusion PCR and we got a product of the expected size (~1.6 kB)!
 +
Next- set up restriction digests of the Cre#2 and Cre#3 plasmids as well as this lox
 +
insert as follows:
 +
5 uL buffer 4
 +
0.5 uL BSA
 +
42 uL insert or plasmid
 +
1.5 uL each restriction enzyme (SacI/HindIII)
 +
 +
===Sept. 5, 2012===
 +
Restriction digests were run on low melt gel, excised and ligated as follows:
 +
 +
1.5 DNA ligase buffer
 +
6 uL H20
 +
1.5 uL DNa ligase
 +
3 uL of insert and 3 uL of plasmid
 +
 +
===Sept. 6, 2012===
 +
Ligations were transformed into DH5alpha and selected for on LB-AMP
 +
 +
===Sept 7, 2012===
 +
TAQ colony PCR was performed on the putative lox clones using primers BI183/
 +
BI84. Only two of 8 colonies appeared to have the correct insert. 5 mL overnights
 +
were started in LB-AMP
 +
 +
===Sept 8, 2012===
 +
Plasmid Preps were done to purify the two Cre-lox plasmids.
 +
 +
===Sept 10, 2012===
 +
Cloning GFP into the Cre-lox plasmids
 +
 +
GFP
 +
BI233 GFP superfolder forward
 +
GGCAAGCTTAGGAGGTATATATG AGC AAA GGT GAA GAA CTG TTT AC
 +
This has a HINDIII site shine delgano, then 25 bp of the beginning of superfolder
 +
GFP!
 +
BI25 GFP superfolder reverse
 +
GCCTCTAGATTACGTAATACCTGCCGCATTC
 +
Reverse Primer for our GFP. Has the XbaI restriction site and a 3 bp handle.
 +
 +
20 uL HF buffer
 +
3 uL dNTP’s
 +
3 uL each primer
 +
1 uL template DNA (pIG20 Superfolder from the Prince lab)
 +
69 uL of ddH20
 +
 +
1 uL Phusion polymerase
 +
 +
===Sept 11, 2012===
 +
 +
Run Superfolder on gel. Is correct size! PCR purify and set up restriction digests of
 +
plasmids and PCR product using the enzymes HIndIII/XbaI.
 +
 +
===Sept 12, 2012===
 +
Restriction Digests were run on gel, were excised and were ligated together using
 +
standard reaction conditions.
 +
 +
===Sept 13, 2012===
 +
Ligations were transformed into DH5alpha selecting on LB-AMP
 +
 +
===Sept 14, 2012===
 +
Transformants were checked via colony PCR. Two transformants had the correct
 +
insert and overnights were started for plasmid prep (call this pIG45)
 +
 +
===Sept 15, 2012===
 +
Plasmid Preps
 +
 +
===Sept 17, 2012===
 +
The Cre lox constructs (pIG45) will now be tested for Cre activity by inducing with
 +
arabinose. Overnights were made in LB-AMP –arabinose.
 +
 +
===Sept 18, 2012===
 +
The overnights were tested for fluorescence (via fluorimeter, using LB-AMP-
 +
arabinose as the blank). IN addition, the overnight was streaked onto LB-AMP so
 +
that tomorrow we can streak onto gentamicin to check for gentamicin resistance.
 +
 +
Results: No fluorescence. Is there something wrong with the superfolder GFP or
 +
with the Cre-lox system? A check for gentamicin resistance tomorrow will tell us.
 +
 +
===Sept 19, 2012===
 +
Patch single colonies onto LB-gentamicin and back to LB-AMP as a control
 +
 +
===Sept. 20, 2012===
 +
 +
All colonies were Gentamicin resistant. Cre-lox system did not work.
 +
 +
===Sept 24-26===
 +
Recheck of Cre-lox system using same protocols as Sept 17-20 but we remade our
 +
LB-AMP-arabinose. We got the same results (no fluorescence, all Gent resistance).
 +
 +
===Sept 26===
 +
We think that maybe the lox cassette we acquired doesn’t work since we sequenced
 +
our plasmid and the cre gene looks great. We designed a new system that is just
 +
Pcon (constitutive promoter-) LoxP- terminator-LoxP to replace the PCon-LoxP-
 +
gentamicin resistance gene- LoxP site
 +
New LOX
 +
BI245 pCOn lox forward
 +
ccgAAGCTTtttacggctagctcagtcctaggtatagtgctagc ATAACTTCGTATA
 +
GCATACATTATACGAAGTTAT agagaatataaaaagccagatt
 +
This is a HindIII site followed by a constitutive promoter followed by the LoxP site.
 +
It will be used with the next primer to perform overlap extention PCR
 +
 +
BI246 Lox term reverse
 +
GCC GAG CTC ATA ACT TCG TAT AAT GTA TGC TAT ACG AAG TTA TAA ATA ATA
 +
AAA AAG CCG GAT TAA TAA TCT GGC TTT TTA TAT TCT CT
 +
sacI site followed by the reverse complement of a loxP site and bidirectional
 +
terminator
 +
 +
Primers ordered.
 +
 +
===Sept. 28===
 +
New lox was synthesized via Phusion PCR (no template, entire insert is produced by
 +
overlap extension PCR).
 +
 +
===Sept. 29===
 +
PCR product is run on gel and verified, restriction digests of insert and plasmid are
 +
set-up.
 +
 +
==October==
 +
 +
===October 1===
 +
Restriction digests were run on gel and then ligated and transformed into DH5alpha
 +
using standard procedures.
 +
 +
===October 2, 2012===
 +
Colony PCR was performed to check for correct lox inserts using lox forward and
 +
GFP reverse. Two of 8 colonies tested were correct. Yay!
{{TeamBYUProvoFooter}}
{{TeamBYUProvoFooter}}

Latest revision as of 03:00, 4 October 2012

Team BYU Provo

Contents

Overall Idea

Google Doc of Plasmid Design

pPLAT

  1. PCR Gene of Interest
  2. Clean up PCR / Purify Plasmid
  3. Restriction Digest (create sticky ends)
  4. Low melt gel to purify product from fragments. Slice gel products
  5. Ligation melt - melt sliced gel products, combine plasmid gel slice with PCR gel slice, add ligase buffer + BSA
  6. Transform new plasmid
  7. Colony PCR to check if previous steps worked
  8. Purify plasmid from colonies that worked

REPEAT to insert additional genes

Protocols

February

2/28/2012

1.PCR product!

PCR

10 ul Hf (5x) buffer

1.5 ul dNTP

1 ul plasmid (181 or 125)

1 ul forward primer

1 ul reverse primer

35 ul H2O

.5 ul Phusion polymerase

50 ul total

March

3/8/2012

1.Cre PCR? It hasn’t worked on the gel yet


        a.Dr. Grose said to reevaluate the cre primer and see what must be going wrong with it. 

2.Restriction digest with Lox

       a.Eric did the PCR DNA purification for the Lox so we need to start with the restriction digest today
       b.We did a restriction enzyme with both the PCR and the plasmid (PIG12) when we did the restriction digest with the plasmid there was a question if enough EcoRI made it into the aliquot. It was almost gone, so if there are any problems it could be linked to the lack of EcoRI in the plasmid digest.

      c.What is the process for restriction digest: 


PCR Product:

41.4 ul PCR

5 ul buffer 4

.5 ul BSA

(mix all of those well before adding the enzymes)

1.5 ul IG11 pLat Forward

1.5 ul IG12 pLat Reverse

50ul total

37 degrees about 2 hours

Plasmid: (Digest plasmid only)

20 ul plasmid

21.5 ul ddH20

5 ul buffer 4

.5 ul BSA

(mix well before adding the enzymes)

1.5 Sac I

1.5 EcoRI-HF (high fidelity)

50 ul total


3/10/2012

Then we ran both restriction digests on the gel:

PCR Product for lox- 7th spot

Plasmid – 8th spot


Results:


3/13/2012

1.We need to locate the bacteria with the cre gene in it- this way we can purify the plasmid and start the PCR process over again since it has not worked thus far

Lox Ligation:

We set up 2 reactions: vector+insert and a vector-only control.

6.5 μL ddH2O

1.5 μL 10X ligase buffer

3 μL vector

1 μL T4 DNA ligase

For vector+insert: 3 μL Lox insert

For vector-only: 3 μL ddH2O

3/15/2012

1. Cre- Dr. Grose located the template from Dr. Griffitts lab (PJG577). It is freshly plated so we will incubate it over night (37 degrees) and it should be ready to purify tomorrow to get the Cre PCR going again.

2. Lox- We used our lox ligation and transformed it. Here is the transformation protocol we used:


Lox transformation

thaw competent cells on ice for ~20 min

add 2ul of ligation to ~25ul of competent cells - vortex or flick

put back on ice for 5-10 minutes

Heat shock at 42 degrees for 60 seconds and place immediately back on ice for 2-5 minutes

add .5 ml (500ul) of lb and incubate at 37 degrees (incubate 30 min if ampicillin and 60 min if anything else)

Plate 100ul of cells and incubate 37 degrees overnight

3/16/2012

Colony PCR:

Now that our Lox-transformed bacteria had been plated and grown, we chose 8 colonies from the plates. We test them to ensure that they have the transformed plasmid. We do this by boiling them to make template DNA, and then PCR-ing the multiple cloning site in order to see whether the gene we inserted made it in. The MCS is normally ~130 BP long, so after it is transformed, it ought to be 130BP+however many BP LOX is.

1. Added 1 colony to a PCR tube with 50 μL water.

2. Repeated 8 times. Carefully labelled the plate and the tube with numbers 1-8.

3. Set up the following TAQ PCR

19 μL H2O

2.5 μL Standard 10X reaction buffer

0.5 μL 10 mM dNTP's

0.5 μL each primer

0.5 μL TAQ DNA polymerase

Then added 2 μL of the boiled Lox-transformed samples.

3/20/2012

LOX: Today we ran a gel from the LOX colonies which were transformed. It ought to be 130BP+however many BP LOX is which will indicate that the insert is present. If the insert is not present then the results of the purified/opened up DNA will only show 130bp which is the size of only the multiple cloning site. The first column after the ladder is the colony that seems to have taken up the lox insert because it is 130BP+.

300x450px

CRE: Since we grew the cre we streaked out from Dr. Griffitts lab last week we purified - we were able to use that as a template today to run our PCR which we will need to run on a gel Thursday 3/22/2012.

3/22/2012

Cre was run out on the following lanes: look in audrey's notebook

300x450px


3/27/2012

CRE: The gel above shows that our Cre PCR did not work - we need to discuss with Dr. Grose why our PCR is still disfunctional. We are not sure where the template came from that Dr. Grose gave us.

LOX: Since or colony PCR had very low efficiency (1:8 colonies actually worked) we decided to run the colony PCR again with the same transformation to see if we could get any better results. We are going to run the LOX PCR today.

Colony PCR:

Now that our Lox-transformed bacteria had been plated and grown, we chose 8 colonies from the plates. We test them to ensure that they have the transformed plasmid. We do this by boiling them to make template DNA, and then PCR-ing the multiple cloning site in order to see whether the gene we inserted made it in. The MCS is normally ~130 BP long, so after it is transformed, it ought to be 130BP+however many BP LOX is.

1. Added 1 colony to a PCR tube with 50 μL water.

2. Repeated 8 times. Carefully labelled the plate and the tube with numbers 1-8.

3. Set up the following TAQ PCR

19 μL H2O

2.5 μL Standard 10X reaction buffer

0.5 μL 10 mM dNTP's

0.5 μL IG57 primer

0.5 μL pLAT reverse primer

0.5 μL TAQ DNA polymerase

Then added 2 μL of the boiled Lox-transformed samples.


3/29/2012

Lox gel: today we ran a gel with the new 8 colonies we were testing for the transformed plasmid. It doesn't look like any of the colonies worked. *Ours are the first 8 wells after the ladder on the bottom row. The efficency is still very low, something probably went bad with the restriction digest. We took the FIRST colony that worked from the FIRST gel we ran that worked and are now isolating the plasmid in the overnight at 37 degrees and we need to purify it tomorrow. (they are labeled BLANK and BLANK 1-1. The Blank 1-1 should be foggy and has the plasmid in it). They have the date 3.22.12 labelled on them.

Cre: We talked to Dr. Grose today about the Cre gene and she is going to get the exact sequence from Dr. Griffitts lab so we can triple check exactly what is not functioning. That is something we need to take care of ASAP.

300x450px

3/29/2012

Pelleted the bacteria with the lox and froze it in the Colon Cancer box.

April

4/28/2012

(HE and EJ)

Lox: today we did Plasmid miniprep kit. LABELLED PURIFIED LOX PLASMID. (it is in the e.coli box in the freezer)

Plasmid Prep:


  1. Harvest cells: Pellet 1-5 ml of an overnight recombinant E. Coli culture by centrifugation. (12,000xg for 1 min)
  2. Resuspend cells: completely resuspend the bacterial pellet with 200μL of the lysis solution. Immediately mix the contents by gentle inversion (6-8 times) DO NOT VORTEX! Do not allow lysis reaction to exceed 5 minutes.
  3. Neutralize: Add 350μL of the neutralization/binding solution. Gently invert the tube 4-6 times. Centrifuge 12,000xg max speed for 10min.
  4. Prepare column: Insert column into microcertrifuge tube. add 500ul of the column preparation solution to each miniprep column and centrifuge at 12,000xg for 30sec to 1min. discard the flow-through fluid.
  5. Load cleared lysate: transfer the cleared lysate from step 3 to the column prepared in step 4 and centrifuge for 30 sec to 1 min
  6. Optional wash (use only with EndA+ strains): Add 500ul of the optional wash solution to the column. Centrifuge for 30sec-1min. Discard flow through fluid.
  7. Wash column: Add 750ul of the diluted wash solution to the column. centrifuge for 30sec-1min. Discard flow through liquid and centrifuge again 1-2 min without any additional wash solution to remove excess ethanol.
  8. Elute DNA: transfer column to a fresh collection tube. Add 100ul of Elution Solution. Centrifuge 1min. The DNA is now present in the eluate and is ready for immediate storage at -20°C


Cre: we are still currently trying to attain the actual sequence for the PJG577 Cre gene from Dr. Griffitts lab to check our primers.

4/30/2012

(EJ and HE)

Lox: We need to determine what the construct of lox is so that we can have it sequenced by adding:

2ul plasmid

1ul primer

Cre: Dr. Griffitts lab is still looking for the cre sequence. They have not been able to find the sequence for the PJG577 and so they are going to continue to look for that and email it to us when they find it. Until then we are unable to make any progress with Cre

May

5/1/2012

EJ

Dr. Grose spoke with the Griffitts lab and discovered that the Cre sequence they use is different from the sequence we found on NCBI. That is why our primers didn't work.

This is the sequence for Cre from the Griffitts lab in pJG125.

Dr. Grose ordered new primers for this Cre sequence. They are BI155 and BI156. Dr. Grose also re-streaked the bacteria that contain the plasmid with Cre so we will have new template when the primers arrive. We can begin cloning this new Cre sequence as soon as we get the primers.

We need to figure out whether our lox plasmid has pBAD in it or not. Apparently some groups in the class used pLAT with pBAD and the other half used pLAT without pBAD. I don't really know how to figure out which one we used...

I (Eric) spoke with Julie and she thinks that we all used pIG12 which has the pBAD promoter in it.


Prepared the Lox plasmid to be sequenced:

In a PCR tube labeled Lox Plasmid Forward

2μL lox transformed plasmid

1μL BI12 (forward primer for pIG12)

In a second PCR tube labeled Lox Plasmid Reverse

2μL lox transformed plasmid

1μL BI157 (reverse primer for pIG12, to be renamed)


Gave the tubes to Dr. Grose who gave them to Jordan. Cross your fingers and hope everything worked!!!


5/4/2012

The best day so far. HE and EJ

Cre: boiled the cre template (PJG125) from Dr. Griffitts lab so we are ready to start cloning the second the new cre primers arrive. We put it in the freezer in the Colon Cancer box labelled "Cre template."

Lox: We got the lox plasmid sequence back from the sequencing lab. We checked for similarities between the sequence and the lox term lox sequence and found a good match (E=0). So we are confident that lox got cloned in!!!!!!!!! Hurray!!!!!!!!!!!!

5/7/2012

The day after the best day so far. HE EJ KN

PCR amplify Cre gene

10 ul Hf (5x) buffer

1.5 ul 10mM dNTP

1 ul plasmid (pJG125 which was boiled last time by Hilary)

1 ul B155 (forward primer)

1 ul B156 (reverse primer)

35 ul ddH2OH2O

.5 ul Phusion polymerase

50 ul total

We wrote C2 on the top of the PCR tub and Cre PCR on the side.

This protocol will amplify the Cre gene from Griffitts lab from the plasmid pJG125. We made new primers based on the Cre sequence given to us from Griffitts labs.

This is the sequence for Cre from the Griffitts lab in pJG125

Once we PCR amplify this gene, we can clone it into the Lox plasmid that we have created.

5/8/2012

EJ and HE

Analysis of PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis:

We ran a gel on agarose gel to assess the quality of our Cre product.

  1. Joe made a standard 1% gel (not low-melt) of 1XTAE and 0.75g of agarose. Put it into the microwave for about 90s until the agarose completely dissolved.
  2. Added 12μL of 1mg/mL ethidium bromide and swirled to mix. Wore gloves.
  3. Allowed the flask to cool so that the glass felt warm, not burning hot. Poured the liquid onto the gel bed and let it cool. Inserted the appropriate sample comb.
  4. Added loading dye to Cre PCR product. Added 6μL of 10X loading dye to the PCR tube.
  5. Moved the gel into the proper orientation in the gel box, covered the gel with 1X TAE buffer and loaded 5μL Cre PCR product into well 11.
  6. Turned on power suply to 100V. Ran for 40-60min. Results are below:

Our Cre didn't work because we froze the phusion polymerase. We had to start with the PCR of Cre again from 5/7/2012.


5/11/2012

HE and EJ

Reran the Cre PCR and then run it out on a gel.

The cre gel didn't work, the last two wells were cre control and cre-3 which are labelled CC and C3. It looks like the cre-3 (3 because it's try #3) got stuck in the well somehow, so we are going to run the gel again at the beginning of the day on Monday, and decide what to do from there if it doesn't work.

The picture is on the E.Colinoscopy USB titled "audrey and Brooke" and the gel details are in Audrey's notebook.


5/15/2012

HE and EJ

Ran the gel with CC and C3 again and:

It did NOT work! :( :( :( .

So we are going to start over again with the Cre (Try #4). I boiled template today by adding 50μL water to a PCR tube and picking up a colony of pJG125 with a pipette tip and depositing it in the PCR tube. Then I boiled the colony in the PCR machine to get out the DNA. Now we will run PCR on the Cre gene again.

PCR amplify Cre gene

35 ul ddH2OH2O

10 ul Hf (5x) buffer

1.5 ul 10mM dNTP

1 ul plasmid (pJG125 which was boiled last time by Hilary)

1 ul B155 (forward primer)

1 ul B156 (reverse primer)

.5 ul Phusion polymerase

50 ul total

This time we added the water first, which we did not do last time. Maybe that was the problem. The last few times we added the water just before the phusion polymerase, so that may be why it wasn't working.

We labelled the tube with template "C4" and the control "CC". We put them in the PCR machine overnight on Phusion PCR cycle. Hopefully it works this time!!!!

We labelled the template "CT4" and put it in the colon cancer box in the freezer

Future

Now that we know the PCR worked, we did a PCR product purification to clean up our Cre gene.

The Cre gene is now ready for restriction digest. We will also perform restriction digest on our Lox plasmid so that we can clone the Cre gene into the Lox plasmid.

5/16/2012

HE

300x450px

We ran our cre on a normal gel and the last two wells in the picture above are the results of cre. As you can see above now our plans are to purify our cre plasmid and then do a restriction digest on both cre and lox to put them together.

5/18/2012

HE

We purified the cre PCR and it is in the colon cancer box labelled "PURIFIED DNA CRE 5/18/2012"

(the directions to purify the PCR are missing from th QIAGEN PCR purification kit and so they are located here: http://www.qiagen.com/literature/default.aspx?Term=PCR+purification&Language=EN&LiteratureType=1&ProductCategory=230 under "QIAquick spin handbook"

On Monday we need to work on doing the restriction digest and low melt gels for both cre and lox to prepare to clone both of them together. Making progress! Feels good!


5/21/2012

HE

Figured out what enzymes are necessary for the Restriction digest and low-melt gel (HindIII HF and PstI)

5/22/2012

HE

Did restriction digest on the purified cre DNA as well as the purified lox DNA. labelled the tubes Vector lox RD and PCR Prd. Cre RD. Used the previously mentioned enzymes (HindIII and PstI) After incubating them for 1.5 hours at 37C and letting making the low-melt gel, I inserted in this order to the wells

14μL ladder 55μL Purified Cre PCR product 55μL purified lox plasmid (vector)

after running the low-melt gel for 60 minutes I looked at it under the UV light and there was NO Cre PCR band ONLY lox. So I have no idea what happened to the DNA. Dr. Grose said it must have happened during the purification process.

We have another tube of Cre PCR that was ran on the gel and worked, so we need to purify that PCR product, do a restriction digest, and run it on a low-melt gel again. I put the low-melt gel product from lox in the freezer (yellow container) and it is labelled "lox 5/22"

5/29/2012

EJ and KN

Because Cre did not work, we needed to do the PCR again. Hopefully this will be the final time.

First I boiled template, which came from the pJG125 plasmid in the refrigerator.

PCR amplify Cre gene

35 ul ddH2OH2O

10 ul Hf (5x) buffer

1.5 ul 10mM dNTP

1 ul plasmid (pJG125 which was boiled last time by Hilary)

1 ul B155 (forward primer)

1 ul B156 (reverse primer)

.5 ul Phusion polymerase

50 ul total

I labeled the cotrol CC5 and I labeled the real PCRs C5 with a 1 on the side, C5 with a 2 on the side, and C6. I had to make 3 different tubes because the first 2 tubes, I forgot to mix the PCR mix before adding the phusion polymerase. So hopefully all 3 PCR tubes work, but C6 should work for sure.

Then I ran the PCRs on a phusion polymerase cycle. After it was finished, I put the PCR tubes in the E. colinoscopy box in the freezer.


5/30/2012

HE

Ran the PCR product out on a regular gel: It was as follows from well 1-well 5 LADDER CC5 C5-1 C5-2 C6-3 There was a band in all 4 of the PCR product wells, including the control. I talked to Jordan about why this would be, because we had a band in our control last time as well, and he said it could be contaminated reagents. (some DNA was added to the reagents and that is what we see) He said that that is a possibility but highly unlikely. We are going to go forward with these results and if we don't have any product in our low-melt again then we will go ahead and run the PCR again with all new/different reagents to illuminate contamination potentials.

300x450px

June

6/4/2012

EJ and HE

PCR Cleanup

In this step, we used C5-2 and C6. Eric did C5-2 and Hilary did C6. Hopefully one of these will work.

  1. Added 250μL of Buffer PB the PCR product.
  2. Placed a QIAquick spin column in a provided 2 ml collection tube.
  3. To bind DNA, applied the sample to the QIAquick column and centrifuged for 30–60 s.
  4. Discarded flow-through. Placed the QIAquick column back into the same tube.
  5. To wash, added 0.75 ml Buffer PE to the QIAquick column and centrifuged for 30–60 s.
  6. Discarded flow-through and placed the QIAquick column back in the same tube. Centrifuged the column for an additional 1 min.

IMPORTANT: Residual ethanol from Buffer PE will not be completely removed unless the flow-through is discarded before this additional centrifugation.

  1. Placed QIAquick column in a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube.
  2. To elute DNA, added 50 μl Buffer EB (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 8.5) to the center of the QIAquick membrane. Let stand for 3 min and centrifuged the column for 1 min.

IMPORTANT: Ensure that the elution buffer is dispensed directly onto the QIAquick membrane for complete elution of bound DNA. The average eluate volume is 48 μl from 50 μl elution buffer volume, and 28 μl from 30 μl elution buffer. Elution efficiency is dependent on pH. The maximum elution efficiency is achieved between pH 7.0 and 8.5.

Restriction Digest of Insert

We did this procedure with C5-2 and C6.

14μL ddH2O

5μL 10X NEB buffer

0.5μL 100X BSA

30μL DNA sample

1-2μL of each restriction enzyme

After adding these to PCR tubes labeled C5-2 and C6, we put the tubes in the incubator for 1.5 hr.

Low Melt Gel - we ran them on the low-melt gel and they showed up, however it is important to note that the C5-2 seemed to be a little smaller/didn't run as far down as the C6. We have no explanation for this except weird. I am putting them in the colon cancer box. They are labelled C5 and C6 with today's date (6/4/2012) on the side.


6/5/2012

HE and EJ

Ligation

With insert--PCR tubes "CL5" and "CL6" (underlined and superlined)

  • 6.5 μL ddH2O
  • 1.5 μL 10X ligase buffer (includes ATP)
  • 1μL T4 DNA ligase
  • 3μL vector
  • 3μL insert

Control (w/o insert) -- PCR tube labeled "CLC"

  • 6.5 μL ddH2O
  • 1.5 μL 10X ligase buffer (includes ATP)
  • 1μL T4 DNA ligase
  • 3μL vector
  • 3μL insert

The water, ligase buffer and ligase were combined as a master mix and transfered into PCR tubes for the ligation. Then the vector was added to both tubes and the insert was added to only one of the tubes. The control tube was labeled "CLC" and the tube with insert was labeled "CL". The tubes were incubated at room temperature for 80 minutes from 11:30-12:50.

The low melt gel tubes were labeled with "LM" for low-melt.


Transformation

Protocol:

  1. Thawed DH5α cells on ice. Melted the ligations at 65°C.
  2. Added 2μL of ligation mix to about 25μL of competant cells. Flicked the tubes briefly and put them back on ice for 5-10 min. Labelled the tubs "ET C52" "ET C63" and "ET CC".
  3. Heat shocked at 42°C for 60 sec. Immediately put the tubes back on ice for 2-5 min.
  4. Added 500μL of plain LB to the rxns and incubated at 37°C for 35 min from 1:15-1:50.
  5. Plated all 500μL of cells and incubated at 37°C overnight.


The 500μL plates that will be in the 37C overnight are labelled crelox transformation control, crelox transformation C5-2, and crelox transformation C6-3 they all have the date on them 6/5/2012 and need to be taken out tomorrow.


6/5/2012

EJ

Colony PCR

Put colonies in 8-tube PCR tubes along with 50μL ddH2O. I labelled the colonies 1-8 on the plates and made sure to put them into the corresponding labelled PCR tube. Boiled the template and froze it. It is ready for PCR next time.


6/11/2012

EJ

Set up the Taq PCR reaction:

Made a master mix (enough for 16 rxns)

  • 304μL ddH2O
  • 40μL Standard 10X rxn buffer
  • 8μL 10 mM dNTP's
  • 8μL IG57 primer
  • 8μL BI12 pPLAT reverse primer

Mixed well before adding

  • 8μL Taq polymerase

Then I transferred 23μL of the master mix to each PCR tube. Then added

  • 2μL of boiled colony sample

Put the two 8 PCR tube sets into the PCR machine on a Taq PCR cycle. It should be finished by 4:00pm today. Then I will need to run a gel to ensure that the Cre gene made it into the insert.


6/12/2012

HE

300x450px

As you can see we do have product from our colony PCR but after looking at the sizes it is clear that these PCR's only contain lox and cre has still not been cloned in. We will try again! Starting back with the Cre PCR and not making a control because our primers are clearly contaminated since our control consistently has product in it.

Argggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg!

Next step: PCR Cre


6/18/2012

PCR amplify Cre gene

35 ul ddH2OH2O

10 ul Hf (5x) buffer

1.5 ul 10mM dNTP

1 ul plasmid (pJG125 which was boiled last time by Hilary)

1 ul B155 (forward primer)

1 ul B156 (reverse primer)

.5 ul Phusion polymerase

50 ul total

I labelled the tube Cre PCR. Put it in the Cre PCR machine at 1:20.

300x450px

Overnight Poured Ara/Amp broth into a test tube and then added the Lox plasmid transformed bacteria from slice 1 of plate 1. Set it in the 37°C incubator overnight.


6/19/2012

PCR Cleanup

  1. Added 250μL of Buffer PB the PCR product.
  2. Placed a QIAquick spin column in a provided 2 ml collection tube.
  3. To bind DNA, applied the sample to the QIAquick column and centrifuged for 30–60 s.
  4. Discarded flow-through. Placed the QIAquick column back into the same tube.
  5. To wash, added 0.75 ml Buffer PE to the QIAquick column and centrifuged for 30–60 s.
  6. Discarded flow-through and placed the QIAquick column back in the same tube. Centrifuged the column for an additional 1 min.

IMPORTANT: Residual ethanol from Buffer PE will not be completely removed unless the flow-through is discarded before this additional centrifugation.

  1. Placed QIAquick column in a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube.
  2. To elute DNA, added 50 μl Buffer EB (10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 8.5) to the center of the QIAquick membrane. Let stand for 3 min and centrifuged the column for 1 min.

IMPORTANT: Ensure that the elution buffer is dispensed directly onto the QIAquick membrane for complete elution of bound DNA. The average eluate volume is 48 μl from 50 μl elution buffer volume, and 28 μl from 30 μl elution buffer. Elution efficiency is dependent on pH. The maximum elution efficiency is achieved between pH 7.0 and 8.5.

Restriction Digest of Insert and Plasmid

14μL ddH2O

5μL 10X NEB buffer

0.5μL 100X BSA

30μL DNA sample

1-2μL HindIII

1-2μL PstI

After adding these to PCR tubes labeled "Cre Ins" and "Lox", we put the tubes in the 37°C incubator for 1.5 hr starting at 12:10.

I should note that we are having doubts as to whether our Lox plasmid was done correctly. In our protocol we wrote that for the restriction digest of Lox we used EcoRI, but that would have been incorrect. We should have used HindIII. We are going to resequence our Lox plasmid and hopefully get better results. If there was a mix-up with restriction enzymes that could be why we have been having so much problems getting Cre into the plasmid. If EcoRI had been used, the HindIII site would have been removed.

We sent off our lox plasmid to the sequencing center again. We want to make sure that lox is actually in the plasmid and that it is between the correct restriction sites. Added 1.5μL plasmid to two PCR tubes and then 1μL of BI12 to one tube and 1μL of IG57 to the other tube.

Low Melt Gel

Mixed 0.8g low melting temperature agarose with 75ml TAE buffer in a flask. Microwaved for three 20 second periods and swished to mix in between periods. Waited for the mixture to cool down so that it wasn't scalding hot. Added 1 drop ethidium bromide and mix. Poured gel and used the large comb.

Cut out the band for our insert and the band for our plasmid. Made sure to not get too much extra gel in order to keep the DNA concentration high in the gel cut out.

Results: Cre came out to be about 1-1.5 kb (very large) and the part of the lox plasmid which was cut out was about 600base pairs which is a pretty large chunk, so I'm not sure why that would be. We need to discuss these results with Dr. Grose and press forward with the ligation tomorrow. The tubes are marked well 2 lox and well 4 cre and are in the cre-lox box in the freezer.

we also didn't get any results for the overnight and so we need to take those out tomorrow.

6/20/12

Take out the overnight!

6/21/12

well... we tried to start the ligation, but soon realized that it wasn't a low-melt gel that was used and so we are not able to melt the gel to ligate them. So we started the cre PCR again and also purified the Lox plasmids so we can have more to work with when we get back to the low-melt step again.

We need to purify the cre PCR as soon as it's done! The Cre template is in the cre-lox box as well as the two gel slices which are not low melt, we need to ask Dr. Grose if there is a way to extract the DNA from the non-lowmelt gels.


6/27/2012

EJ

Dr. Grose got back the sequencing results for Lox again. We looked to see where it cloned in, and it was not between the cut sites we expected it to be. How in the world it got somewhere else we have no idea. It's really strange. Take home message is that we need to re-clone lox into our plasmid. Since we already have Cre PCR'd and ready to go we may as well clone that into a new plasmid, and then get lox into the plasmid. Let's do it!

Restriction Digest of Plasmid

14μL ddH2O

5μL 10X NEB buffer

0.5μL 100X BSA

30μL pIG12

1.6μL HindIII HF

1.6μL PstI HF

After I added everything together, I put them in the 37°C water bath from 3:45 to 8:20. I labelled the tube PIG12 RD and I put it in the freezer.


6/28/2012

EJ and HE

Hillary re-PCR'd Cre and purified it.

Poured a low-melt gel in to run out the PIG12 RD. Ran the low-melt from 12:30-1:20.

300x450px

Put the gel slice in the freezer in the Cre Lox box. It is labelled "PIG12 Low-melt". I put both of Audrey's gel slices in the Cholera box in the freezer.

Started Lox. Boiled bacteria from pJG181, and streaked a plate for future use. I put the plate in the 37°C incubator, so I will need to take it out tomorrow.

Checked the gel with the Cre PCR on it around 12:05. Print two pictures, one for Justin. Key: Ladder, 2 lanes with Justin's stuff, Cre.

300x450px

Dr. Grose looked at this gel and said that Cre looked fine. So we will continue to the RD with Cre

pCONLOXTERMLOX PCR

This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct.

  • 35μL ddH2O
  • 10μL 5X Phusion buffer
  • 1.5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 1μL Primer BI133 (SacI cut site)
  • 1μL Primer IG84 (HindIII cut site)
  • 0.5μL Phusion Polymerase

I labelled the tube "Lox PCR". It is in the PCR machine.

Cre Restriction Digest

I added the following to the purified Cre. I omitted the water and DNA sample, because that is what Dr. Grose said to do. I had a little trouble getting the BSA buffer out of the pipet tip because it was such a small amount, so if there is a problem, that might be the source.

  • 5μL 10X NEB buffer
  • 0.5μL 100X BSA
  • 1.6μL HindIII HF
  • 1.6μL PstI HF

Incubated mixture into the 37°C bath for 2.5hrs from 2:00-4:30. I then put it in the Cre Lox box in the freezer. It is labelled "Purified Cre DNA".

Poured a low melt gel to run out the Cre on as soon as the RD is finished. Put it in the refrigerator for use tomorrow.

July

7/2/2012

We ran the lox PCR out on a gel and then did the PCR cleanup, unfortunately neither of them worked out! So we are running the PCR again:

pCONLOXTERMLOX PCR

This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct.

  • 35μL ddH2O
  • 10μL 5X Phusion buffer
  • 1.5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 1μL Primer BI133 (SacI cut site)
  • 1μL Primer IG84 (HindIII cut site)
  • 0.5μL Phusion Polymerase

I labelled the tube "Lox PCR". It is in the PCR machine.

Ran the low melt gel. The Cre looks to be about the right size (just over 1kB). Here is a picture:

300x450px

Cre Ligation into pIG12

Melt the gel slices at 65°C

  • 6.5μL ddH2O
  • 1.5μL 10X ligase buffer
  • 1μL T4 DNA ligase
  • 3μL vector (pIG12)
  • 3μL insert (Cre)

Incubated at room temperature for 45 min from 4:40-5:25.

Transformation

  1. Thawed DH5α cells on ice. Melted the ligations at 65°C.
  2. Added 2μL of ligation mix to about 25μL of competant cells. Flicked the tubes briefly and put them back on ice for 5-10 min. Labelled the tube "ET Cre"
  3. Heat shocked at 42°C for 60 sec. Immediately put the tube back on ice for 2-5 min.
  4. Added 500μL of plain LB to the rxn and incubated at 37°C for 45 min.
  5. Plated all 500μL of cells and incubated at 37°C overnight.

The 500μL plates that will be in the 37°C overnight are labelled Cre transformation CONTROL and Cre transformation. Both have the date on them (7/2/2012) and need to be taken out tomorrow.


7/3/2012

EJ

Colony PCR

I chose 8 colonies from the Cre Transformation plate to make template for TAQ colony PCR, and streaked them out on a plate for future use. Put the plate in the 30°C incubator for two days, until Thursday. Set up the TAQ PCR rxn with Jordan. Made a master mix:

  • 190μL ddH2O
  • 25μL standard 10x rxn buffer
  • 5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 5μL BI12 pLAT reverse primer
  • 5μL IG57 primer

Mixed these reagents well and then added

  • 5μL TAQ DNA polymerase

Then we added 2μL of boiled template to each well, making sure to keep the numbering the same (the template from one went into the tube labelled 1, 2 into 2, etc). Ran the TAQ PCR overnight.


7/5/2012

Ran my TAQ PCR out on a gel. My lanes were the ones in the middle of the gel. I loaded ladder, wells 1-8, and then the control. Here is a picture:

300x450px

As you can see, there is absolutely no DNA in our lanes. Wo is me!!!

We figured that a plasmid had to make it into the bacteria because colonies grew on the plate which had ampicillin in it. So there may have been a problem with the template that I used. We re-ran the TAQ PCR. We made the following master mix:

  • 190μL ddH2O
  • 25μL standard 10x rxn buffer
  • 5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 5μL BI12 pLAT reverse primer
  • 5μL IG57 primer

Mixed these reagents well and then added

  • 5μL TAQ DNA polymerase

Then we added 2μL of boiled template to each well, making sure to keep the numbering the same (the template from one went into the tube labelled 1, 2 into 2, etc). Ran the TAQ PCR overnight.

Update: This colony PCR showed that the insert did not make it into any of the plasmids. Start over.


7/10/2012

Boiled template for Cre. This was done with bacteria pJG125.

Dr. Grose ran the following PCR with Cre.

  • 35μL ddH2O
  • 10μL 5X Phusion buffer
  • 1.5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 1μL Primer BI133 (SacI cut site)
  • 1μL Primer IG84 (HindIII cut site)
  • 0.5μL Phusion Polymerase

Ran the PCR out on a gel. These were the results. Cre is in the top lanes. From right to left it goes: ladder, Cre, Cre control.

300x450px

Eric ran the PCR cleanup along with Justin and Joseph.

Dr. Grose ran the following Restriction Digest:

  • 50μL DNA (pIG12 or Cre cleanup)
  • 5μL 10X NEB buffer
  • 0.5μL 100X BSA
  • 1-2μL PSTI HF
  • 1-2μL HINDIII HF

Left in the water bath at 37°C from 1:00-3:30. Poured a low melt gel. Then Hillary ran the low melt with Cre, PJG125, and Joseph/Justin's PCR stuff. Cut out the gel and put into tubes labelled "pJG125 LM" and "Cre LM".


7/16/2012

It appears that the Cre transformation worked!

We ran the following TAQ PCR on the Cre colonies. We made the following master mix:

  • 190μL ddH2O
  • 25μL standard 10x rxn buffer
  • 5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 5μL BI12 pLAT reverse primer
  • 5μL IG57 primer

Mixed these reagents well and then added

  • 5μL TAQ DNA polymerase

Then we added 2μL of boiled template to each well, making sure to keep the numbering the same (the template from one went into the tube labelled 1, 2 into 2, etc). Ran the TAQ PCR overnight.


This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct, according to Dr. Grose. If they are correct, I don't know what we were doing wrong before, because these were the same primers we used. This is the IG84 sequence from the primer tube: CCG AAG CTT TTT ACG GCT AGC TCA GTC CTA GGT ATA GTG CTA GCC ATA ACT TCG TAT AGC.

  • 35μL ddH2O
  • 10μL 5X Phusion buffer
  • 1.5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 1μL Primer BI133 (SacI cut site)
  • 1μL Primer IG84 (HindIII cut site)
  • 0.5μL Phusion Polymerase

I labelled the tube "Lox PCR". It is in the PCR machine.


7/26/2012

This is the PCR setup to amplify pCONLoxTermLox from pIG181. These primers should be correct.

  • 35μL ddH2O
  • 10μL 5X Phusion buffer
  • 1.5μL 10mM dNTP's
  • 1μL Primer BI133 (SacI cut site)
  • 1μL Primer IG84 (HindIII cut site)
  • 0.5μL Phusion Polymerase

I labelled the tube "L" and the control "LC". They are in the PCR machine. Next step is to do a gel.

August

August 26, 2012

Cloning Cre-Lox.: Background: The Cre-lox system must first be cloned into an inducible promoter (PBAD) and checked for function before it is used in our final construct where it will be placed under the Sox/thermosensor promoter and shine-delgarno. First, Cre will be cloned into plasmid PBAD/pLAT and then GFP downstream from PCON-LOX-GENT-TERM-LOX (a constitutive promoter followed by a lox site, gentamycin resistance cassette, a terminator, and another lox site). When cre is not transcribed, the cells will be gentamycin resistant and also GFP negative. When Cre is transcribed, the cells will be gentamycin sensitive but GFP positive since the DNA between the LOX sites will be removed.

The Cre gene was PCR amplified using primers BI 155 and BI 156 and cloned into the PBAD/pLAT plasmid that last year’s iGEM team made (pIG13 )so that it would be inducible by the pBAD promoter.

BI155: ggcctgcagaggaggttaattaATGTCCAATTTACTGACCGTAC """This is the forward Cre primer. For use with BI156.this primer contains the PstI site, followed by a SD and then the first 24 bp of Cre (including the ATG). To be used with BI156 to amplify cre from the Joel Griffitts plasmid pJG125.

BI156: ggcaagcttCTA GTC GCC ATC TTC CAG CAG Cre Reverse with HIndIII site and STOP

A phusion PCR was setup as follows:

20 uL HF buffer 3 uL dNTP’s 3 uL each primer 1 uL template DNA (pJG125 from the Joel Griffitts lab – source of Cre) 69 uL of ddH20 1 uL Phusion polymerase

August 27, 2012

Cre PCR was run on gel and verified as ~800 bp. It was then digested along with pIG13 with as follows:

5 uL buffer 4 0.5 uL BSA 42 uL insert or plasmid 1.5 uL each restriction enzyme (PstI/HindIII)

August 28, 2012 Digested Cre insert and pIG13 were run on gel and the correct bands were seen (800 bp and 3500 bp respectively) and cut out of the gel, then ligated as follows:

1.5 DNA ligase buffer 6 uL H20 1.5 uL DNa ligase 3 uL of insert and 3 uL of plasmid

Ligations were allowed to set on the desk for 1 hour, then were transformed into DH5alpha by the heat shock protocol and plated on LB-AMP.

August 29,2012

Colony PCR of putative clones: used primers BI155 and BI156 along with boiled colonies from the transformation plate to check for inserts. We got 100% cloning efficiency (see gel). We started 5 mL overnights in LB-AMP for plasmid purification (colonies #2 and #3).

September

Sept. 3, 2012

We did plasmid preps using the Sigma miniprep kit according to manufacturers protocols. We also set-up Phusion PCR for the Pcon-Lox-Gent-Term-LoxP- cassette using primers BI133 and BI84 and the template from Joel Griffitt’s lab (pJG181).

BI133 Lox reverse CCGgagctcATTGGATCCATAACTTCGTATAATG (SalI ) This is the pConLoxTermLox Reverse primer. It has the SacI restriction cut site, instead of SalI restriction site like IG86. SacI, the restriction site on this primer, is the correct cut site. (used with the vector from Dr. Griffitts lab - pJG181)

BI84 PCon-Lox-gentamycin-terminator-Lox forward (HindIII) ccgAAGCTTtttacggctagctcagtcctaggtatagtgctagcCATAACTTCGTATAGCATACATTATA HindIII pCon lox term lox forward. I checked for restriction sites in pCon lox term lox. There are no HindIII, salI, EcoRI, SpeI or xbaI!

20 uL HF buffer 3 uL dNTP’s 3 uL each primer 1 uL template DNA (pJG181 from the Joel Griffitts lab – source of Cre) 69 uL of ddH20 1 uL Phusion polymerase

Sept. 4, 2012

We ran the phusion PCR and we got a product of the expected size (~1.6 kB)! Next- set up restriction digests of the Cre#2 and Cre#3 plasmids as well as this lox insert as follows: 5 uL buffer 4 0.5 uL BSA 42 uL insert or plasmid 1.5 uL each restriction enzyme (SacI/HindIII)

Sept. 5, 2012

Restriction digests were run on low melt gel, excised and ligated as follows:

1.5 DNA ligase buffer 6 uL H20 1.5 uL DNa ligase 3 uL of insert and 3 uL of plasmid

Sept. 6, 2012

Ligations were transformed into DH5alpha and selected for on LB-AMP

Sept 7, 2012

TAQ colony PCR was performed on the putative lox clones using primers BI183/ BI84. Only two of 8 colonies appeared to have the correct insert. 5 mL overnights were started in LB-AMP

Sept 8, 2012

Plasmid Preps were done to purify the two Cre-lox plasmids.

Sept 10, 2012

Cloning GFP into the Cre-lox plasmids

GFP BI233 GFP superfolder forward GGCAAGCTTAGGAGGTATATATG AGC AAA GGT GAA GAA CTG TTT AC This has a HINDIII site shine delgano, then 25 bp of the beginning of superfolder GFP! BI25 GFP superfolder reverse GCCTCTAGATTACGTAATACCTGCCGCATTC Reverse Primer for our GFP. Has the XbaI restriction site and a 3 bp handle.

20 uL HF buffer 3 uL dNTP’s 3 uL each primer 1 uL template DNA (pIG20 Superfolder from the Prince lab) 69 uL of ddH20

1 uL Phusion polymerase

Sept 11, 2012

Run Superfolder on gel. Is correct size! PCR purify and set up restriction digests of plasmids and PCR product using the enzymes HIndIII/XbaI.

Sept 12, 2012

Restriction Digests were run on gel, were excised and were ligated together using standard reaction conditions.

Sept 13, 2012

Ligations were transformed into DH5alpha selecting on LB-AMP

Sept 14, 2012

Transformants were checked via colony PCR. Two transformants had the correct insert and overnights were started for plasmid prep (call this pIG45)

Sept 15, 2012

Plasmid Preps

Sept 17, 2012

The Cre lox constructs (pIG45) will now be tested for Cre activity by inducing with arabinose. Overnights were made in LB-AMP –arabinose.

Sept 18, 2012

The overnights were tested for fluorescence (via fluorimeter, using LB-AMP- arabinose as the blank). IN addition, the overnight was streaked onto LB-AMP so that tomorrow we can streak onto gentamicin to check for gentamicin resistance.

Results: No fluorescence. Is there something wrong with the superfolder GFP or with the Cre-lox system? A check for gentamicin resistance tomorrow will tell us.

Sept 19, 2012

Patch single colonies onto LB-gentamicin and back to LB-AMP as a control

Sept. 20, 2012

All colonies were Gentamicin resistant. Cre-lox system did not work.

Sept 24-26

Recheck of Cre-lox system using same protocols as Sept 17-20 but we remade our LB-AMP-arabinose. We got the same results (no fluorescence, all Gent resistance).

Sept 26

We think that maybe the lox cassette we acquired doesn’t work since we sequenced our plasmid and the cre gene looks great. We designed a new system that is just Pcon (constitutive promoter-) LoxP- terminator-LoxP to replace the PCon-LoxP- gentamicin resistance gene- LoxP site New LOX BI245 pCOn lox forward ccgAAGCTTtttacggctagctcagtcctaggtatagtgctagc ATAACTTCGTATA GCATACATTATACGAAGTTAT agagaatataaaaagccagatt This is a HindIII site followed by a constitutive promoter followed by the LoxP site. It will be used with the next primer to perform overlap extention PCR

BI246 Lox term reverse GCC GAG CTC ATA ACT TCG TAT AAT GTA TGC TAT ACG AAG TTA TAA ATA ATA AAA AAG CCG GAT TAA TAA TCT GGC TTT TTA TAT TCT CT sacI site followed by the reverse complement of a loxP site and bidirectional terminator

Primers ordered.

Sept. 28

New lox was synthesized via Phusion PCR (no template, entire insert is produced by overlap extension PCR).

Sept. 29

PCR product is run on gel and verified, restriction digests of insert and plasmid are set-up.

October

October 1

Restriction digests were run on gel and then ligated and transformed into DH5alpha using standard procedures.

October 2, 2012

Colony PCR was performed to check for correct lox inserts using lox forward and GFP reverse. Two of 8 colonies tested were correct. Yay!