Team:Osaka/HumanPractice
From 2012.igem.org
(→Questionnaire in our survey) |
(→Results) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
|-style="background-color:transplanet;" | |-style="background-color:transplanet;" | ||
- | !13. Do you have a radiation | + | !13. Do you have a radiation dosimeter? |
|- style="background-color:transplanet;" | |- style="background-color:transplanet;" | ||
| | | | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
== Results == | == Results == | ||
- | <p>・Most of people do not avoid buying genetically modified foods, while they do not like to eat them. It sounds | + | <p>・Most of people do not avoid buying genetically modified foods, while they do not like to eat them. It sounds inconsistent.(Q1) </p> |
<p>・"Synthetic biology" is known by very little people. We, iGEMers, need to spread the knowledge of synthetic biology.(Q2)</p> | <p>・"Synthetic biology" is known by very little people. We, iGEMers, need to spread the knowledge of synthetic biology.(Q2)</p> | ||
- | <p>・"iPS cells" are more famous than ES cells. This is, maybe, due to the news of Prof. Yamanaka in Kyoto University, who established the | + | <p>・"iPS cells" are more famous than ES cells. This is, maybe, due to the news of Prof. Yamanaka in Kyoto University, who established the technique to treat iPS cells.(Q3)</p> |
<p>・People's knowledge about radiation seems partial and inadequate,for example, "the difference between the units, becquerel and Sievert"and "the difference between radioactivity, radiation, and radioactivity substance", etc. are not understood very well. More accurate knowledge of radiation is shall be expanded.(Q10)</p> | <p>・People's knowledge about radiation seems partial and inadequate,for example, "the difference between the units, becquerel and Sievert"and "the difference between radioactivity, radiation, and radioactivity substance", etc. are not understood very well. More accurate knowledge of radiation is shall be expanded.(Q10)</p> | ||
<p>・Nearly half people feel “rather credible” about information on recent radioactive problems. But almost all people seem not to believe information completely. (Q11)</p> | <p>・Nearly half people feel “rather credible” about information on recent radioactive problems. But almost all people seem not to believe information completely. (Q11)</p> |
Latest revision as of 02:53, 27 September 2012
Human Practices
Questionnaire in our survey
We conducted a wide survey targeted at the general public, with respondents ranging from high school students to working citizens, in collaboration with the Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT-Kyoto) and Ehime University (Ehime-Japan). The survey had two objectives. The first was to find how Japanese people feel or think about synthetic biology and its associated issues such as bioethics and safety. The second was to capture the public perception of radiation in Japan. We surveyed people who came not only from biological backgrounds but also from various other fields of study. We also obtained feedback from visitors to our universities' open campus events. In addition, we made an online version of our questionnaire to survey even more people from various walks of life.
The Questionnaire
1. When shopping, do you buy “not genetically modified food? |
---|
|
2. Have you ever heard the word, “Synthetic biology? |
|
3. What do you associate with [genetic engineering and Biotechnology]? |
|
4. What do you think about [genetic engineering]? |
|
5. What do you associate with [flies]? |
|
6. Do you know [ leukemia ]? |
|
7. Which do you guess [ leukemia ]? (※Please circle all that apply) |
|
8. Which do you guess [treatment for leukemia]? |
|
9. What treatment for leukemia do you want? |
leukemia cells’ activities/ Inhibit leukemia cells’ divisions /Others()] |
10. Please check your knowledge about radiation(※Please check all that apply) |
|
11. How do you feel about information on radioactive problem?(※Please circle all that apply) |
|
12. Do you think about “Nuclear power phase-out”? |
|
13. Do you have a radiation dosimeter? |
|
14. Were you changed your opinion about radiation? If yes, please write concretely. |
|
15. Which technology do you fear, gene recombination or radiation technology? |
|
Results
・Most of people do not avoid buying genetically modified foods, while they do not like to eat them. It sounds inconsistent.(Q1)
・"Synthetic biology" is known by very little people. We, iGEMers, need to spread the knowledge of synthetic biology.(Q2)
・"iPS cells" are more famous than ES cells. This is, maybe, due to the news of Prof. Yamanaka in Kyoto University, who established the technique to treat iPS cells.(Q3)
・People's knowledge about radiation seems partial and inadequate,for example, "the difference between the units, becquerel and Sievert"and "the difference between radioactivity, radiation, and radioactivity substance", etc. are not understood very well. More accurate knowledge of radiation is shall be expanded.(Q10)
・Nearly half people feel “rather credible” about information on recent radioactive problems. But almost all people seem not to believe information completely. (Q11)
・Many people think Japan should give up nuclear power. The number of them is 3.25 times as large as opponents.(Q12)
・Radiation dosimeter is not spread in the Kansai-region. And many people think it is not necessary. Maybe, we believe, dosimeter are more needed in the Touhoku-region.(Q13)
・More than half people say that they did not changed their opinion about radiation after the accident. People who answered “Yes”, also says “I got to make efforts to find out correct information” and “I became to pay attentions to the news of nuclear power plants than before” and so on.(Q14)
・Many people seem to afraid both gene recombination and radiation technology, but radiation technology is feared more than gene recombination. In order to use bio-dosimeter practically, we would have to ease people's anxiety about gene recombination very carefully. (Q15)