Team:Edinburgh/Modelling/Kappa/Structure

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m
m
Line 44: Line 44:
The code can be found at <span class="plainlinks"><a href="https://github.com/evgeniya-sotirova/EdiGEM12">EdiGEM’s github repository</a></span> together with a detailed description of all made assumptions and used rates.
The code can be found at <span class="plainlinks"><a href="https://github.com/evgeniya-sotirova/EdiGEM12">EdiGEM’s github repository</a></span> together with a detailed description of all made assumptions and used rates.
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
-
The MtrCAB electron transfer system from Shewanella oneidensis implemented in E. coli proved to be a challenge in terms of modelling.
+
The MtrCAB electron transfer system from <i>Shewanella oneidensis</i> implemented in <i>E. coli</i> proved to be a challenge in terms of modelling.
-
To begin with, this type of electron transfer in E. Coli is relatively new idea. There is little information on periplasmic proteins, such as NapC, so many assumptions had to be made in the modelling.
+
To begin with, this type of electron transfer in <i>E. Coli</i> is relatively new idea. There is little information on periplasmic proteins, such as NapC, so many assumptions had to be made in the modelling.
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
Another issue of this system from the point of view of modelling is the level of detail at which it can be represented. The Kappa language offers the useful don’t care don’t write convention (DCDW), so we can simply ignore cell elements that are not involved in this process. However, even so we are left with a significant process which involves a large part of the cell. This is why we decided to divide the whole process into sub-processes. We model them separately at first and combine them at the end.
Another issue of this system from the point of view of modelling is the level of detail at which it can be represented. The Kappa language offers the useful don’t care don’t write convention (DCDW), so we can simply ignore cell elements that are not involved in this process. However, even so we are left with a significant process which involves a large part of the cell. This is why we decided to divide the whole process into sub-processes. We model them separately at first and combine them at the end.

Revision as of 00:06, 27 September 2012

Structure of the Model



The code can be found at EdiGEM’s github repository together with a detailed description of all made assumptions and used rates.

The MtrCAB electron transfer system from Shewanella oneidensis implemented in E. coli proved to be a challenge in terms of modelling. To begin with, this type of electron transfer in E. Coli is relatively new idea. There is little information on periplasmic proteins, such as NapC, so many assumptions had to be made in the modelling.

Another issue of this system from the point of view of modelling is the level of detail at which it can be represented. The Kappa language offers the useful don’t care don’t write convention (DCDW), so we can simply ignore cell elements that are not involved in this process. However, even so we are left with a significant process which involves a large part of the cell. This is why we decided to divide the whole process into sub-processes. We model them separately at first and combine them at the end.

The sub-processes can roughly be described in the following way:

Sub-process:                                               Corresponding Kappa File:
1. Glucose -> TCA cycle -> Quinol                          1_TCA.ka
2. Quinol -> NapC                                          2_NapC.ka
3. NapC -> MtrA-> MtrB or Fe soluble                       3_MtrABC.ka
4. MtrC -> Flavins -> Fe insoluble                         4_UFe.ka
5. Combines 3. and 4.                                      5.ka
The sub-systems 1, 3 and 4 proved to be vast enough for a modelling project on their own.