Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week2
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
{{KIT-Kyoto.Header}} | {{KIT-Kyoto.Header}} | ||
+ | {{KIT-Kyoto}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
<ul class="navi"> | <ul class="navi"> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
- | <div class="category"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/ | + | <div class="category"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/db/Side_partskit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></div> |
+ | <ul class="menu"> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week1p"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1b/Side_week1kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week2p"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/94/Side_week2kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week3p"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e0/Side_week3kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week4p"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/31/Side_week4kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week5p"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e7/Side_week5kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <div class="category"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/eb/Side_tnfaip3kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></div> | ||
<ul class="menu"> | <ul class="menu"> | ||
<li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week1"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1b/Side_week1kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week1"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1b/Side_week1kit.jpg" width="150" height="30"></a></li> | ||
Line 93: | Line 104: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
+ | |||
<td width="800px" valign="top"><div id="MIGI"> | <td width="800px" valign="top"><div id="MIGI"> | ||
- | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | + | <h2>August 8th</h2> |
- | <br> | + | <br> |
- | < | + | <br> |
+ | We isolated 5 colonies from the LB plate, and cultured.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>August 9th</h2> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Purification of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNAs from five independent sample -1,-2,-3,-4 and -5 were purified by the alkaline-lysis method.<br> | ||
+ | We added 0.2uL of 10ng/uL RNase A to them and incubate them for 1 hour.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 2. Characterization of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was digested wit EcoRⅠ as follows.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> Each diluted DNA sample </Td><Td> 1μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10×H buffer </Td><Td> 0.5μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> EcoRⅠ </Td><Td> 0.2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> dH<sub>2</sub>O </Td><Td> 3.3μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> total </Td><Td> 5μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | After incubation of these samples for 1hour, we added 1uL of 6×Dye to each of them and electrophoresed in 0.7% agarose gel in following order.<br> | ||
+ | Left, 10fold dilution, 2uL marker, 20fold dilution, 30fold dilution, 1uL marker, 40fold dilution, 0.5uL marker right.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <strong>Result</strong><br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/9b/0809.png" width="500" height="300"> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | The concerntration of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was estimated as 200ng/uL.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | 3. PCR amplification of the insert DNA<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The four 5'primers were designed for PCR as follows.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ・GW3r<br> | ||
+ | 5’-ATCGAGGCCTGTCTAGAGAAGC<br> | ||
+ | ・TNFA-1<br> | ||
+ | 5’-GGCTTTGCTATGATACTCGGAACTG<br> | ||
+ | ・TNFA-2<br> | ||
+ | 5’-GTAAAATGTGAAACGCCCAACTGC<br> | ||
+ | ・TNFA-3<br> | ||
+ | 5’-GGACTCCAGAAAACAAGGGCTTT<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The 3’ primer was designed as follows.<br> | ||
+ | ・SVr<br> | ||
+ | 5’-GGCATTCCACCACTGCTCCC<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PCR reactions with the following combinations of primers were carried out.<br> | ||
+ | sample1→GW3r―SVr<br> | ||
+ | sample2→TNFA-1―SVr<br> | ||
+ | sample3→TNFA-2―SVr<br> | ||
+ | sample4→TNFA-3―SVr<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PCR was carried out in the following reactions. | ||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> </Td><Td> Each sample </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 50ng/μL LR TNFA-1 </Td><Td> 1μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10×rTaq buffer </Td><Td> 2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 2mM dNTPs </Td><Td> 2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 25mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> </Td><Td> 0.8μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10P 5'primer </Td><Td> 0.6μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10P 3'primer </Td><Td> 0.6μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> rTaq </Td><Td> 0.4μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> dH<sub>2</sub>O </Td><Td> 12.6μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> total </Td><Td> 20μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reaction conditions of PCR | ||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> temperature </Td><Td> time </Td><Td> cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 95°C </Td><Td> 2min </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 95°C </Td><Td> 15sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 55°C </Td><Td> 30sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 68°C </Td><Td> 2min30sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 68°C </Td><Td> 2min30sec </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 14°C </Td><Td> ∞ </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>August 10th</h2> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Electrophoresis of PCR products was carried out.<br> | ||
+ | After adding 2uL of 6×Dye to each 10uL of sample, we electrophoresed them in 0.7% agarose gel in following order.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Left marker5uL sample1 sample2 sample3 sample4 Wright<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong>Result</strong><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/8/84/0810.png" width="500" height="300"> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The sizes of the PCR products were unexpected ones. We therefore concluded the construction of pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was not successful.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>August 13th</h2> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cut check of the plasmid DNA(the candidate pENTR-TNFAIP3) after BP reaction.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The candidate pENTR-TNFAIP3 was digested with HindⅢ that will cut out the insert DNA.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> the candidate pENTR-TNFAIP3 prepared on 8/6 </Td><Td> 1μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10×M buffer </Td><Td> 0.5μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> Hind Ⅲ </Td><Td> 0.2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> dH<sub>2</sub>O </Td><Td> 3.3μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> total </Td><Td> 5μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br>After reaction, samples were electrophoresed in following order.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Left: 1kb marker5uL cut sample <br> | ||
+ | Right: uncut sample<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <strong>Results</strong> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/2a/0813.png" width="500" height="300"> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | Insert size was different from the expected one. We therefore concluded that the construction of entry DNA was not successful.<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>August 14th</h2> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on the results, we decided to carry out the PCR reaction for TNFAIP3 DNA again.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Composition of the reaction | ||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> </Td><Td> sample1 </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10ng/μL TNFAIP3 </Td><Td> 6μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10×KOD plus buffer </Td><Td> 10μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 2mM dNTPs </Td><Td> 10μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 25mM MgSO<sub>4</sub> </Td><Td> 3.2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10P 5'primer </Td><Td> 3μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 10P 3'primer </Td><Td> 3μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> KOD plus </Td><Td> 2μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> dH<sub>2</sub>O </Td><Td> 62.8μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> total </Td><Td> 100μL </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reaction conditions | ||
+ | <Table Border Cellspacing="0"> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> temperature </Td><Td> time </Td><Td> cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 95°C </Td><Td> 2min </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 95°C </Td><Td> 15sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 60°C </Td><Td> 30sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 68°C </Td><Td> 2min30sec </Td><Td> 25cycle </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 68°C </Td><Td> 2min30sec </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | <Tr><Td> 14°C </Td><Td> ∞ </Td><Td> </Td></Tr> | ||
+ | </Table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | PCR product was applied to the 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong>Results</strong><br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/c4/0814.png" width="500" height="300"> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div align="right"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:KIT-Kyoto/Notebook-week3">>>>>>>>>>WEEK3</a></div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 04:13, 26 September 2012
August 8thWe isolated 5 colonies from the LB plate, and cultured. August 9th1. Purification of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA The candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNAs from five independent sample -1,-2,-3,-4 and -5 were purified by the alkaline-lysis method. We added 0.2uL of 10ng/uL RNase A to them and incubate them for 1 hour. 2. Characterization of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA The candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was digested wit EcoRⅠ as follows.
After incubation of these samples for 1hour, we added 1uL of 6×Dye to each of them and electrophoresed in 0.7% agarose gel in following order. Left, 10fold dilution, 2uL marker, 20fold dilution, 30fold dilution, 1uL marker, 40fold dilution, 0.5uL marker right. Result The concerntration of the candidate pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was estimated as 200ng/uL. 3. PCR amplification of the insert DNA The four 5'primers were designed for PCR as follows. ・GW3r 5’-ATCGAGGCCTGTCTAGAGAAGC ・TNFA-1 5’-GGCTTTGCTATGATACTCGGAACTG ・TNFA-2 5’-GTAAAATGTGAAACGCCCAACTGC ・TNFA-3 5’-GGACTCCAGAAAACAAGGGCTTT The 3’ primer was designed as follows. ・SVr 5’-GGCATTCCACCACTGCTCCC PCR reactions with the following combinations of primers were carried out. sample1→GW3r―SVr sample2→TNFA-1―SVr sample3→TNFA-2―SVr sample4→TNFA-3―SVr PCR was carried out in the following reactions.
Reaction conditions of PCR
August 10thElectrophoresis of PCR products was carried out. After adding 2uL of 6×Dye to each 10uL of sample, we electrophoresed them in 0.7% agarose gel in following order. Left marker5uL sample1 sample2 sample3 sample4 Wright Result The sizes of the PCR products were unexpected ones. We therefore concluded the construction of pUAS-flag-TNFAIP3 DNA was not successful. August 13thCut check of the plasmid DNA(the candidate pENTR-TNFAIP3) after BP reaction. The candidate pENTR-TNFAIP3 was digested with HindⅢ that will cut out the insert DNA.
After reaction, samples were electrophoresed in following order. Left: 1kb marker5uL cut sample Right: uncut sample Results Insert size was different from the expected one. We therefore concluded that the construction of entry DNA was not successful. August 14thBased on the results, we decided to carry out the PCR reaction for TNFAIP3 DNA again. Composition of the reaction
Reaction conditions
PCR product was applied to the 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis. Results |