"
Team:TU Darmstadt/Modeling
From 2012.igem.org
(→Modeling) |
(→Homologie Modeling) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
== Modeling == | == Modeling == | ||
==Homologie Modeling== | ==Homologie Modeling== | ||
| + | While our proteins are functionally described in literature and during the IGEM competition, no structures are available in the protein data bank. For further work and visualizations structure is indispensible. We used Yasara Structure [1] to calculate 3-dimensional structures of our Proteins we used within the IGEM. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Workflow=== | ||
| + | Description how our Yasara scripts calculates homology model[7]: | ||
| + | [[File:Aln+pnB.png|Alignment with an homologie model|right|500px]] | ||
| + | # Sequence is PSI-BLASTed against Uniprot [2] | ||
| + | # Calculation of a a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) from related sequences | ||
| + | # Using the PSSM to search the PDB for potential modeling templates | ||
| + | # The Templates are ranked based on the alignment score and the structural quality[3] | ||
| + | # Deriving additional information’s for template and Target (prediction of secondary structure, structure-based alignment correction by using SSALN scoring matrices [4]. | ||
| + | # A graph of the side-chain rotamer network is built, dead-end elimination is used to find an initial rotamer solution in the context of a simple repulsive energy function [5] | ||
| + | # The loop-network is optimized using a high amount of different orientations | ||
| + | # Side-chain rotamers are fine-tuned considering electrostatic and knowledge-based packing interactions as well as solvation effects. | ||
| + | # An unrestrained high-resolution refinement with explicit solvent molecules is run, using the latest knowledge-based force fields[6]. | ||
| + | ===Application=== | ||
| + | All these steps are performed to every template used for the modeling approach. For our project we set the maximum amount of templates to 20. Every derived structure is evaluated using an average per-residue quality Z-scores. At least a hybrid model is built containing the best regions of all predictions. This procedure make prediction’s accurate and thus more realistic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===References=== | ||
| + | [1] E. Krieger, G. Koraimann, and G. Vriend, “Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field.,” Proteins, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 393–402, 2002. | ||
| + | [2] S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman, “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.,” Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, Sep. 1997. | ||
| + | [3] R. W. Hooft, G. Vriend, C. Sander, and E. E. Abola, “Errors in protein structures.,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6580. Nature Publishing Group, p. 272, 1996. | ||
| + | [4] D. T. Jones, “Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 1999. | ||
| + | [5] A. A. Canutescu, A. A. Shelenkov, and R. L. Dunbrack, “A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction.,” Protein Science, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2001–2014, 2003. | ||
| + | [6] E. Krieger, K. Joo, J. Lee, J. Lee, S. Raman, J. Thompson, M. Tyka, D. Baker, and K. Karplus, “Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8.,” Proteins, vol. 77 Suppl 9, no. June, pp. 114–122, 2009. | ||
| + | [7] http://www.yasara.org/homologymodeling.htm | ||
| + | |||
==Information Theory== | ==Information Theory== | ||
==Docking Simulations== | ==Docking Simulations== | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 9 September 2012
| Home | | Team | | Official Team Profile | | Project | | Parts Submitted to the Registry | | Modeling | | Notebook | | Safety | | Attributions |
|---|
If you choose to include a Modeling page, please write about your modeling adventures here. This is not necessary but it may be a nice list to include.
<math>H(X)=-\sum\limits_{x}p(x)\cdot \log_{2} p(x)</math>
Contents |
Modeling
Homologie Modeling
While our proteins are functionally described in literature and during the IGEM competition, no structures are available in the protein data bank. For further work and visualizations structure is indispensible. We used Yasara Structure [1] to calculate 3-dimensional structures of our Proteins we used within the IGEM.
Workflow
Description how our Yasara scripts calculates homology model[7]:
- Sequence is PSI-BLASTed against Uniprot [2]
- Calculation of a a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) from related sequences
- Using the PSSM to search the PDB for potential modeling templates
- The Templates are ranked based on the alignment score and the structural quality[3]
- Deriving additional information’s for template and Target (prediction of secondary structure, structure-based alignment correction by using SSALN scoring matrices [4].
- A graph of the side-chain rotamer network is built, dead-end elimination is used to find an initial rotamer solution in the context of a simple repulsive energy function [5]
- The loop-network is optimized using a high amount of different orientations
- Side-chain rotamers are fine-tuned considering electrostatic and knowledge-based packing interactions as well as solvation effects.
- An unrestrained high-resolution refinement with explicit solvent molecules is run, using the latest knowledge-based force fields[6].
Application
All these steps are performed to every template used for the modeling approach. For our project we set the maximum amount of templates to 20. Every derived structure is evaluated using an average per-residue quality Z-scores. At least a hybrid model is built containing the best regions of all predictions. This procedure make prediction’s accurate and thus more realistic.
References
[1] E. Krieger, G. Koraimann, and G. Vriend, “Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field.,” Proteins, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 393–402, 2002. [2] S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman, “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.,” Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, Sep. 1997. [3] R. W. Hooft, G. Vriend, C. Sander, and E. E. Abola, “Errors in protein structures.,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6580. Nature Publishing Group, p. 272, 1996. [4] D. T. Jones, “Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 1999. [5] A. A. Canutescu, A. A. Shelenkov, and R. L. Dunbrack, “A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction.,” Protein Science, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2001–2014, 2003. [6] E. Krieger, K. Joo, J. Lee, J. Lee, S. Raman, J. Thompson, M. Tyka, D. Baker, and K. Karplus, “Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8.,” Proteins, vol. 77 Suppl 9, no. June, pp. 114–122, 2009. [7] http://www.yasara.org/homologymodeling.htm
Information Theory
Docking Simulations
Gaussian network model
Molecular Dynamics
Svens sandbox...
