Team:Edinburgh/Project/Non-antibiotic-Markers/DhlA

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{:Team:Edinburgh/header}} {{Team:Edinburgh/css/navigation-structure.css}} {{Team:Edinburgh/css/navigation-style.css}} <html> <style type="text/css"> - wiki edit: #content{ ...")
m
Line 64: Line 64:
<li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/Non-antibiotic-Markers/Sucrose-Hydrolase">Sucrose Hydrolase</p></li>
<li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/Non-antibiotic-Markers/Sucrose-Hydrolase">Sucrose Hydrolase</p></li>
<li><p class="indented">DhlA</p></li>
<li><p class="indented">DhlA</p></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Project/Non-antibiotic-Markers/Plac-RFP-SacB">Plac-RFP-SacB</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>

Revision as of 15:21, 24 September 2012

Non-antibiotic selectable and counter-selectable markers:

DhlA

Background

DhlA is haloalkane dehalogenase from Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10 (Keuning, Janssen, & Witholt, 1985). It converts 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) into the more toxic 2-chloroethanol and is successfully used as a counterselectable marker in plants (Naested, Fennema, Hao, Andersen, Janssen, & Mundy, 1999). This is why, we decided to assess its suitability as a counters selectable marker in bacteria.

Cloning

PCR amplification of BS-dhlA with these primers resulted in no product.


Forward primer: atga gaattc gcggccgc t tctaga gaggc tctat gataa atgc
Reverse primer: gact ctgcag cggccgc t actagt a tta t tattc tgtct cggca aagtg


Figure 14: DNA gel of PCR amplification of BS-dhlA with DhlA designed primer resulted in no bands.
Close the primers.

Characterization

Plates

To test how suitable DhlA is as counterselectable marker, BS-control and BS-dhlA strains were grown in the presence and absence of DCA. Both strains showed similar growth in presence and absence of DCA.

Figure 15.Comparison of growth of BS-contol and BS-dhlA at 0 ul and 20 ul DCA. Both strains showed similar growth in presence and absence of DCA.

Liquid cultures

Liquid cultures with different DCA concentrations of both BS-control and BS-dhlA were prepared. No distinct difference between the growths of the two strains was evident.

Figure 16. Comparison of growth of BS-contol and BS-dhlA in liquid cultures with varying DCA concentrations. Both strains showed similar growth.

Conclusion:

We extensively characterized the dehalogenase gene in plates and liquid cultures.

We determined that it is not suitable as a counterselectable marker.

Further plans:

To biobrick it.