Team/CINVESTAV-IPN-UNAM MX/oxigenresponse.htm

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 307: Line 307:
           <p>This system remains inactive under high oxygen tension, when oxygen
           <p>This system remains inactive under high oxygen tension, when oxygen
concentration decreases, it is possible the GFP transcription. (See Rhodofactory section for
concentration decreases, it is possible the GFP transcription. (See Rhodofactory section for
-
a complete explanation).<br>
+
a complete explanation).<br><br>
We made two BioBricks (BBa_K776019 y BBa_K776021) to test the Oxygen
We made two BioBricks (BBa_K776019 y BBa_K776021) to test the Oxygen
Line 355: Line 355:
<br>
<br>
-
  In <em>R. palustris</em>, we had GFP expression in dependent promoter (BBa_K776019), maybe
+
  In <em>R. palustris</em>, we had GFP expression in PrrA dependent promoter (BBa_K776019), maybe
-
  because orthologous proteins activated it, and the complete system (BBa_K776021) also
+
  because orthologous proteins activated it. The complete system (BBa_K776021) also
-
  was functional in the expected condition.<br>
+
  was functional but in a lower level, assumably due to the interference of other proteins that regulate photosynthetic genes.<br>
-
<br>
+
<br>  
-
The GFP expression that we did not expected under environmental conditions, probably it
+
The GFP expression that we did not expected was in aerobic condition in the complete system, probably
-
is due to the complexity in the regulatory network where this system is involved, and
+
is due to the complexity of the regulatory network where this system is involved.
-
there are interfering proteins.
+
</p>
</p>
<p id="text2">Conclusion</p>
<p id="text2">Conclusion</p>
<p> Our two BioBricks (K776019 and BBa_K776021) are functional in two photosynthetic
<p> Our two BioBricks (K776019 and BBa_K776021) are functional in two photosynthetic
-
  bacteria <em>R. palustris</em> and <em>R. sphaeroides</em>. This is a functional system for controlling genetic
+
  bacteria <em>R. palustris</em> and <em>R. sphaeroides</em>, both in anaerobic/light expected condition. This is a functional system for controlling genetic
  expression with Oxygen tension.</p>
  expression with Oxygen tension.</p>

Latest revision as of 03:36, 27 October 2012

Rho

Oxygen Control System!

PrrA/PrrB two component system

This system remains inactive under high oxygen tension, when oxygen concentration decreases, it is possible the GFP transcription. (See Rhodofactory section for a complete explanation).

We made two BioBricks (BBa_K776019 y BBa_K776021) to test the Oxygen Control System, each one has GFP as a reporter gene and the functionality was related to the fluorescence detection.

Figure 1. This BioBrick will show if our dependent promoter is functional, using the constitutive (or natural) system from R. sphaeroides or the orthologue system from R. palustris.

Figure 2. This BioBrick will show if our complete system is functional because probably we need a synthetic system to promote GFP expression by binding its target sequence (dependent promoter) in R. palustris.

Both systems were cloned in pRK415 because this is a vector for Purple Non-Sulfur Photosynthetic Bacteria, the plasmids were introduced in R. sphaeroides and R. palustris, by biparental and triparental conjugation.

The measurement approach we used was:

  • Fluorescence Microscopy: To have a qualitative detection of GFP in these bacteria.
  • Flow Cytometry: To have a quantitative detection of GFP expression, we calculated the percentage of bacterial population expressing GFP (GFP+) in 1000 bacteria.

  • We used 3 environmental growing conditions:

  • Aerobic/Darkness
  • Anaerobic/Light
  • Anaeroibic/darkness
  • For all data results, we considered a negative control: Rhodobacter sphaeroides or Rhodopseudomonas palustris, conjugated bacteria with pRK415 vector without BioBrick.

    Figure 3. Percentage of bacterial population expressing GFP.

    Figure 4. Representative images obtained by fluorescence microscopy, where our systems were functional in the expected conditions.

    Discussion

    In R. sphaeroides, as we can see in figure 3 and 4, there was low GFP expression, probably because growing conditions were microaerophilic instead of extrictly anaerobic. In anaerobic conditions PrrB autophosphorylates and passes a phosphate group to PrrA, this activated PrrA binds its promoter sequence to start GFP expression. Furthermore, when we introduced the complete system (BBa_K776021), actually we are overexpressing the regulatory proteins and the signaling could not be fully controlled.

    In R. palustris, we had GFP expression in PrrA dependent promoter (BBa_K776019), maybe because orthologous proteins activated it. The complete system (BBa_K776021) also was functional but in a lower level, assumably due to the interference of other proteins that regulate photosynthetic genes.

    The GFP expression that we did not expected was in aerobic condition in the complete system, probably is due to the complexity of the regulatory network where this system is involved.

    Conclusion

    Our two BioBricks (K776019 and BBa_K776021) are functional in two photosynthetic bacteria R. palustris and R. sphaeroides, both in anaerobic/light expected condition. This is a functional system for controlling genetic expression with Oxygen tension.

     

    Rhodofactory 2012

    icytdf
    osli
    bio
    fermentAS
    cinestav
    genscript
    unam
    gto
    quimica
    valaner
    ipn