Team:Slovenia/SafetyMechanismsEscapeTag

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 398: Line 398:
<br/>
<br/>
<p>We considered several variants to ensure destruction of escaped cells such as:</p>
<p>We considered several variants to ensure destruction of escaped cells such as:</p>
-
<ol type="A">
+
<ol type="a">
<li>quorum sensing which would provide the survival signal only for cell clusters within microcapsules,</li>
<li>quorum sensing which would provide the survival signal only for cell clusters within microcapsules,</li>
<li>conjugation of microcapsule material with a ligand for a receptor that provides a survival signal,</li>
<li>conjugation of microcapsule material with a ligand for a receptor that provides a survival signal,</li>

Revision as of 15:50, 25 September 2012


Escape tag

In the unlikely case that our therapeutic cells escape from the capsules and to prevent their dissemination through the body we designed a safety mechanism that would enhance the recognition and destruction of the escaped therapeutic cells by the innate immune system.

We introduced an escape tag that labels the cells with a surface protein that alerts natural killer cells of the host organism to recognize and destroy cells.

HEK293 cells expressing MICA protein were efficiently killed by human NK cells.


We considered several variants to ensure destruction of escaped cells such as:

  1. quorum sensing which would provide the survival signal only for cell clusters within microcapsules,
  2. conjugation of microcapsule material with a ligand for a receptor that provides a survival signal,
  3. activation of apoptosis for escaped cells when they encounter the extracellular matrix and
  4. tagging cells for the recognition and destruction by the cells of the immune system.

After considering many factors we selected the immuno-tagging variant because of its elegant simplicity and since it seems less sensitive to the spontaneous loss of the constructs and leaky apoptosis than other options.