Team:ETH Zurich/HumanPractice

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
=== NRP 59 ===
=== NRP 59 ===
 +
[[Image:ETH_wordle.png|right|thumb|200px|creative representation of the article]]
To approach human practices in a different way, we decided to inform about a topic that science, politic and society recently focused on in Switzerland: <br \>
To approach human practices in a different way, we decided to inform about a topic that science, politic and society recently focused on in Switzerland: <br \>
-
[[Image:ETH_wordle.png|left|thumb|200px|creative representation of the article]]
+
 
-
In August 2012, the results of a five year long national research project (NRP) on genetically modified plants (GMP) were published and likewise raised the attention of public, politic, press and scientific community. <br \>
+
In August 2012, the results of a five year long national research project (NRP) on genetically modified plants (GMP) were published and likewise raised the attention of public, politic, press and scientific community. The title of the NRP was 'benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified plants'. <br \>
We want to take the unique opportunity that emerged with the end of the NRP this year to tell about the ‘Swiss story’ of genetically modified plants in the framework of the iGEM competition. To do so, we have interviewed two key players of plant biotechnology in Switzerland and reviewed the results and the press review on the recent publication of the results of NRP. <br \><br \>
We want to take the unique opportunity that emerged with the end of the NRP this year to tell about the ‘Swiss story’ of genetically modified plants in the framework of the iGEM competition. To do so, we have interviewed two key players of plant biotechnology in Switzerland and reviewed the results and the press review on the recent publication of the results of NRP. <br \><br \>
-
The discussion on genetically modified plants relates directly to our project: at some point, our genetically modified organisms that form the basis of ''E.coli''pse should be brought to their purpose: protecting human skin from dangerous UV radiation. The discussion on GMP will be followed by the discussion about genetically modified organisms that are produced by the rapid progress in synthetic biology as well as each year by iGEM teams all over the world. <br \><br \>
+
=== How does this relate to iGEM and our project? ===
 +
The discussion on genetically modified plants relates as follows to our project: at some point, our genetically modified organisms that form the basis of ''E.coli''pse should be brought to their purpose: protecting human skin from dangerous UV radiation. We believe that the discussion about genetically modified organisms that are produced by the rapid progress in synthetic biology as well as each year by iGEM teams all over the world will be similar to the one about genetically modified plants. With our article, we give an overview how Switzerland deals with GMPs.<br \><br \>
 +
 
In a few years, maybe another iGEM team reviews another national research program that deals with the 'benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified '''organisms''' '?<br \>
In a few years, maybe another iGEM team reviews another national research program that deals with the 'benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified '''organisms''' '?<br \>
<br \>
<br \>

Latest revision as of 22:08, 26 October 2012

Eth ecolipseeth logo.png
Eth igem logo.png


Contents

Human Practices

NRP 59

creative representation of the article

To approach human practices in a different way, we decided to inform about a topic that science, politic and society recently focused on in Switzerland:

In August 2012, the results of a five year long national research project (NRP) on genetically modified plants (GMP) were published and likewise raised the attention of public, politic, press and scientific community. The title of the NRP was 'benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified plants'.
We want to take the unique opportunity that emerged with the end of the NRP this year to tell about the ‘Swiss story’ of genetically modified plants in the framework of the iGEM competition. To do so, we have interviewed two key players of plant biotechnology in Switzerland and reviewed the results and the press review on the recent publication of the results of NRP.

How does this relate to iGEM and our project?

The discussion on genetically modified plants relates as follows to our project: at some point, our genetically modified organisms that form the basis of E.colipse should be brought to their purpose: protecting human skin from dangerous UV radiation. We believe that the discussion about genetically modified organisms that are produced by the rapid progress in synthetic biology as well as each year by iGEM teams all over the world will be similar to the one about genetically modified plants. With our article, we give an overview how Switzerland deals with GMPs.

In a few years, maybe another iGEM team reviews another national research program that deals with the 'benefits and risks of the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms '?

ETH sun smile.png

Find the work we did here.



Visit at Swiss Society for Biomedical Engineering 2012 in Lausanne

The Swiss iGEM teams (ETH, 4 people: left, EPFL 5 people: right) at the SBBE meeting in Lausanne

On August 27th, we had the opportunity to meet the EPF Lausanne iGEM team at the [http://128.178.104.170/twiki/bin/view/MaerklLab/MeetingSSBE2012 Annual Meeting] of the Swiss Society for Biomedical Engineering ([http://www.ssbe.ch/Meetings/meeting/13 SSBE]) 2012 in Lausanne. Two of our team members did a presentation on our project to the biomedical engineers and we shared experiences with the EPFL team. We were mentioned in an article by the EPFL iGEM team (in french). Since both of our teams work on light activated systems, we had valueable discussions. We offered help with our Photoinduction model.




References

  • Brown, B. a, Headland, L. R., & Jenkins, G. I. (2009). UV-B action spectrum for UVR8-mediated HY5 transcript accumulation in Arabidopsis. Photochemistry and photobiology, 85(5), 1147–55.
  • Christie, J. M., Salomon, M., Nozue, K., Wada, M., & Briggs, W. R. (1999): LOV (light, oxygen, or voltage) domains of the blue-light photoreceptor phototropin (nph1): binding sites for the chromophore flavin mononucleotide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(15), 8779–83.
  • Christie, J. M., Arvai, A. S., Baxter, K. J., Heilmann, M., Pratt, A. J., O’Hara, A., Kelly, S. M., et al. (2012). Plant UVR8 photoreceptor senses UV-B by tryptophan-mediated disruption of cross-dimer salt bridges. Science (New York, N.Y.), 335(6075), 1492–6.
  • Cloix, C., & Jenkins, G. I. (2008). Interaction of the Arabidopsis UV-B-specific signaling component UVR8 with chromatin. Molecular plant, 1(1), 118–28.
  • Cox, R. S., Surette, M. G., & Elowitz, M. B. (2007). Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters. Molecular systems biology, 3(145), 145. doi:10.1038/msb4100187
  • Drepper, T., Eggert, T., Circolone, F., Heck, A., Krauss, U., Guterl, J.-K., Wendorff, M., et al. (2007). Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence without oxygen. Nature biotechnology, 25(4), 443–5
  • Drepper, T., Krauss, U., & Berstenhorst, S. M. zu. (2011). Lights on and action! Controlling microbial gene expression by light. Applied microbiology, 23–40.
  • EuropeanCommission (2006). SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON CONSUMER PRODUCTS SCCP Opinion on Biological effects of ultraviolet radiation relevant to health with particular reference to sunbeds for cosmetic purposes.
  • Elvidge, C. D., Keith, D. M., Tuttle, B. T., & Baugh, K. E. (2010). Spectral identification of lighting type and character. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 10(4), 3961–88.
  • GarciaOjalvo, J., Elowitz, M. B., & Strogatz, S. H. (2004). Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(30), 10955–60.
  • Gao Q, Garcia-Pichel F. (2011). Microbial ultraviolet sunscreens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 9(11):791-802.
  • Goosen N, Moolenaar GF. (2008) Repair of UV damage in bacteria. DNA Repair (Amst).7(3):353-79.
  • Heijde, M., & Ulm, R. (2012). UV-B photoreceptor-mediated signalling in plants. Trends in plant science, 17(4), 230–7.
  • Hirose, Y., Narikawa, R., Katayama, M., & Ikeuchi, M. (2010). Cyanobacteriochrome CcaS regulates phycoerythrin accumulation in Nostoc punctiforme, a group II chromatic adapter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(19), 8854–9.
  • Hirose, Y., Shimada, T., Narikawa, R., Katayama, M., & Ikeuchi, M. (2008). Cyanobacteriochrome CcaS is the green light receptor that induces the expression of phycobilisome linker protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28), 9528–33.
  • Kast, Asif-Ullah & Hilvert (1996) Tetrahedron Lett. 37, 2691 - 2694., Kast, Asif-Ullah, Jiang & Hilvert (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5043 - 5048
  • Kiefer, J., Ebel, N., Schlücker, E., & Leipertz, A. (2010). Characterization of Escherichia coli suspensions using UV/Vis/NIR absorption spectroscopy. Analytical Methods, 9660. doi:10.1039/b9ay00185a
  • Kinkhabwala, A., & Guet, C. C. (2008). Uncovering cis regulatory codes using synthetic promoter shuffling. PloS one, 3(4), e2030.
  • Krebs in Deutschland 2005/2006. Häufigkeiten und Trends. 7. Auflage, 2010, Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg) und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V. (Hrsg). Berlin.
  • Lamparter, T., Michael, N., Mittmann, F., & Esteban, B. (2002). Phytochrome from Agrobacterium tumefaciens has unusual spectral properties and reveals an N-terminal chromophore attachment site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(18), 11628–33.
  • Levskaya, A. et al (2005). Engineering Escherichia coli to see light. Nature, 438(7067), 442.
  • Mancinelli, A. (1986). Comparison of spectral properties of phytochromes from different preparations. Plant physiology, 82(4), 956–61.
  • Nakasone, Y., Ono, T., Ishii, A., Masuda, S., & Terazima, M. (2007). Transient dimerization and conformational change of a BLUF protein: YcgF. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(22), 7028–35.
  • Orth, P., & Schnappinger, D. (2000). Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nature structural biology, 215–219.
  • Parkin, D.M., et al., Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2005. 55(2): p. 74-108.
  • Rajagopal, S., Key, J. M., Purcell, E. B., Boerema, D. J., & Moffat, K. (2004). Purification and initial characterization of a putative blue light-regulated phosphodiesterase from Escherichia coli. Photochemistry and photobiology, 80(3), 542–7.
  • Rizzini, L., Favory, J.-J., Cloix, C., Faggionato, D., O’Hara, A., Kaiserli, E., Baumeister, R., et al. (2011). Perception of UV-B by the Arabidopsis UVR8 protein. Science (New York, N.Y.), 332(6025), 103–6.
  • Roux, B., & Walsh, C. T. (1992). p-aminobenzoate synthesis in Escherichia coli: kinetic and mechanistic characterization of the amidotransferase PabA. Biochemistry, 31(30), 6904–10.
  • Strickland, D. (2008). Light-activated DNA binding in a designed allosteric protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(31), 10709–10714.
  • Sinha RP, Häder DP. UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. (2002). 1(4):225-36
  • Sambandan DR, Ratner D. (2011). Sunscreens: an overview and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Apr;64(4):748-58.
  • Tabor, J. J., Levskaya, A., & Voigt, C. A. (2011). Multichromatic Control of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Biology, 405(2), 315–324.
  • Thibodeaux, G., & Cowmeadow, R. (2009). A tetracycline repressor-based mammalian two-hybrid system to detect protein–protein interactions in vivo. Analytical biochemistry, 386(1), 129–131.
  • Tschowri, N., & Busse, S. (2009). The BLUF-EAL protein YcgF acts as a direct anti-repressor in a blue-light response of Escherichia coli. Genes & development, 522–534.
  • Tschowri, N., Lindenberg, S., & Hengge, R. (2012). Molecular function and potential evolution of the biofilm-modulating blue light-signalling pathway of Escherichia coli. Molecular microbiology.
  • Tyagi, A. (2009). Photodynamics of a flavin based blue-light regulated phosphodiesterase protein and its photoreceptor BLUF domain.
  • Vainio, H. & Bianchini, F. (2001). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Volume 5: Sunscreens. Oxford University Press, USA
  • Quinlivan, Eoin P & Roje, Sanja & Basset, Gilles & Shachar-Hill, Yair & Gregory, Jesse F & Hanson, Andrew D. (2003). The folate precursor p-aminobenzoate is reversibly converted to its glucose ester in the plant cytosol. The Journal of biological chemistry, 278.
  • van Thor, J. J., Borucki, B., Crielaard, W., Otto, H., Lamparter, T., Hughes, J., Hellingwerf, K. J., et al. (2001). Light-induced proton release and proton uptake reactions in the cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph1. Biochemistry, 40(38), 11460–71.
  • Wegkamp A, van Oorschot W, de Vos WM, Smid EJ. (2007 )Characterization of the role of para-aminobenzoic acid biosynthesis in folate production by Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. Apr;73(8):2673-81.
Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/HumanPractice"