Team:University College London/Module 6/Results

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Colony Halo size Assay)
(Colony Halo size Assay)
Line 26: Line 26:
 +
Nuclease positive cells
 +
{| class="bigtable"
 +
|-
 +
! Time !! Sample 1(Abs) ! Sample 2 (Abs)
 +
|-
 +
| 0 || 0.001 || 0.001
 +
|-
 +
| 1 || 0.004 || 0.006
 +
|-
 +
| 2 || 0.006 || 0.009
 +
|-
 +
| 3 || 0.009 || 0.016
 +
|-
 +
| 4 || 0.24 || 0.035
 +
|-
 +
| 5 || 0.053 || 0.076
 +
|-
 +
| 6 || 0.084 || 0.116
 +
|-
 +
| 7 || 0.183 || 0.217
 +
|-
 +
| 8 || 0.299 || 0.479
 +
|-
 +
| 9 || 0.684 || 0.918
 +
|-
 +
| 10 || 0.801 || 1.499
 +
|-
 +
| 11 || 0.913 || 1.804
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 1.022 || 2.033
 +
|}
-
 
+
Nuclease negative cells
-
Nuclease positive cells Nuclease negative cells
+
{| class="bigtable"
-
time Sample 1 (Abs) Sample 2/ Abs Sample 1 (Abs) Sample 2 (Abs)
+
|-
-
0 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
+
! Time !! Sample 1(Abs) ! Sample 2 (Abs)
-
1 0.004 0.006 0.001 0.001
+
|-
-
2 0.006 0.009 0.009 0.005
+
| 0 || 0.001 || 0.001
-
3 0.009 0.016 0.026 0.014
+
|-
-
4 0.24 0.035 0.034 0.026
+
| 1 || 0.001 || 0.001
-
5 0.053 0.076 0.068 0.057
+
|-
-
6 0.084 0.116 0.092 0.088
+
| 2 || 0.009 || 0.005
-
7 0.183 0.217 0.179 0.184
+
|-
-
8 0.299 0.479 0.306 0.297
+
| 3 || 0.026 || 0.014
-
9 0.684 0.918 0.666 0.678
+
|-
-
10 0.801 1.499 0.777 0.799
+
| 4 || 0.034 || 0.026
-
11 0.913 1.804 0.924 0.955
+
|-
-
12 1.022 2.033 1.073 1.099
+
| 5 || 0.068 || 0.057
 +
|-
 +
| 6 || 0.092 || 0.088
 +
|-
 +
| 7 || 0.179 || 0.184
 +
|-
 +
| 8 || 0.306 || 0.297
 +
|-
 +
| 9 || 0.666 || 0.678
 +
|-
 +
| 10 || 0.777 || 0.799
 +
|-
 +
| 11 || 0.924 || 0.955
 +
|-
 +
| 12 || 1.073 || 1.099
 +
|}
== Growth Unaffected by Periplasmic Nuclease Expression  ==
== Growth Unaffected by Periplasmic Nuclease Expression  ==

Revision as of 19:35, 26 September 2012

Contents

Module 6: Containment

Description | Design | Construction | Characterisation | Modelling | Results | Conclusions

DNase Agar Assay

The following table shows the results we obtained from the DNase agar test. DNase agar contains DNA, which our periplasmic nuclease digests. This digestion is observed by adding hydrochloric acid to the agar plates, which causes the remaining DNA to precipitate, causing 'cloudiness' to the DNase agar.

As seen in our DNase agar plate, there is a clear halo surrounding our nuclease transformed cells, indicating a DNA-free zone where the nuclease has digested the DNA in the agar. No such halo is present in our untransformed cells. This indicates that our transformation has been successful, and that BBa_K729004 is working as expected, producing periplasmic nuclease that is capable of digesting extracellular genetic material.

DNase Agar Assay
Control BBa_K729019
UniversityCollegeLondon Nuclease Control.jpg UniversityCollegeLondon Nuclease K729004.jpg

Colony Halo size Assay

A separate DNase agar assay was also done, in order to determine if there was any correlation between colony size and nuclease production of our nuclease BioBrick (BBa_K729019). DNase agar was plated out with nuclease transformed W3110, at a concentration to produce single colonies on the plates. Colony sizes were measured, as wer the DNA-free zones surrounding the colonies.

We have determined that a linear correlation exists between colony size and halo diameter, hence suggesting that cells produce nuclease even as they grow.

UniversityCollegeLondon Nuclease Colony Halo Diameter correlation.png


Nuclease positive cells

Time Sample 1(Abs) ! Sample 2 (Abs)
0 0.001 0.001
1 0.004 0.006
2 0.006 0.009
3 0.009 0.016
4 0.24 0.035
5 0.053 0.076
6 0.084 0.116
7 0.183 0.217
8 0.299 0.479
9 0.684 0.918
10 0.801 1.499
11 0.913 1.804
12 1.022 2.033

Nuclease negative cells

Time Sample 1(Abs) ! Sample 2 (Abs)
0 0.001 0.001
1 0.001 0.001
2 0.009 0.005
3 0.026 0.014
4 0.034 0.026
5 0.068 0.057
6 0.092 0.088
7 0.179 0.184
8 0.306 0.297
9 0.666 0.678
10 0.777 0.799
11 0.924 0.955
12 1.073 1.099

Growth Unaffected by Periplasmic Nuclease Expression

A growth curve assay was done on our nuclease transformed cells in order to determine if there was sufficient intracellular production of nuclease to adversely affect the viability of our cells. The cells were grown in shake flasks, and their optical density at 600nm was measured.

Our results indicate that the nuclease BioBrick does not negatively affect the growth of our cells. The growth rates obtained from our nuclease transformed cells are comparable to those of the untransformed W3110 cell line.

UniversityCollegeLondon Nuclease Toxicity Growth Curve Assay.png