Team:Tokyo Tech/Safety

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{tokyotechcss}}
 
-
<div class="whitebox">
 
-
{{tokyotechtop}}
 
-
</div>
 
-
{{tokyotechmenubar}}
 
-
<div class="whitebox">
 
-
<div id="tokyotech" style=" font:bold ;left ; font-size: 50px; color: #1E90FF; padding: 10px;">
 
-
Safety</div>
 
-
</div class="whitebox">
 
-
<div class="whitebox">
 
-
<div id="tokyotech" style=" font:bold ;left ; font-size: 15px; color: #000000; padding: 30px;">
 
-
__NOTOC__
 
-
=Safety=
 
-
<p>
 
-
For iGEM 2012 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety
 
-
associated with their projects. Specifically, teams should consider the following questions:
 
-
</P>
 
-
 
-
<p>
 
-
<b>
 
-
Q1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of researcher safety,
 
-
public safety or environmental safety ?
 
-
</b>
 
-
</p>
 
-
 
-
A1. No, our project ideas do not raise any safety issue in terms of researcher safety,
 
-
public safety or environmental safety. All the experiments are carried out in the lab,
 
-
they are safe for the researcher and the environment, and they do not have any hazard
 
-
outside the lab.
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
<p>
 
-
<b>
 
-
Q2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety
 
-
issues? If yes,did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle
 
-
the safety issue? how could other teams learn from your experience?
 
-
</b>
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>
 
-
A2.No, none of our BioBricks parts (or devices) created this year raises any safety issue, which are all BL1 and BL2. </p>
 
-
 
-
 
-
<p>
 
-
<b>
 
-
Q3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
 
-
If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
 
-
</b>
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>
 
-
A3. Yes there is. The biosafety committee of our organization accepted part of our applications.
 
-
The other part of the applications is going to be evaluated.  After all of our applications being accepted,
 
-
  we will start wet experiments.
 
-
</p>
 
-
 
-
 
-
<p>
 
-
<b>
 
-
Q4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for
 
-
future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer
 
-
through biosafety engineering?
 
-
</b>
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>
 
-
A4. We think it'll be a good idea to use review sheets to record information of the parts. These review sheets can be made in collaboration with the local biosafety group.
 
-
</p>
 
-
 
-
=Safety=
 
-
 
-
Use this page to answer the questions on the  [[Safety | safety page]].
 

Revision as of 07:29, 5 September 2012