Team:Tokyo Tech/Project

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Communication dependent inverter)
(Abstract)
Line 9: Line 9:
<div id="tokyotech" style=" font:Arial ;left ; font-size: 15px; color: #000000; padding: 30px;">  
<div id="tokyotech" style=" font:Arial ;left ; font-size: 15px; color: #000000; padding: 30px;">  
-
=Abstract=
+
=Ⅰ-0 Abstract=
We designed a cell-cell communication system that makes two types of engineered <I>E.coli</I> play “Romeo and Juliet”. We represented the four scenes with concentration of signal molecules 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL. 3OC6HSL is synthesized by LuxI enzyme in cell Romeo, and 3OC12HSL is synthesized by LasI enzyme in Juliet cell. To reproduce the four scenes, we designed three subsystems: '''positive feedback system''', '''band detect system''', and '''communication-inverter dependent suicide system'''.  
We designed a cell-cell communication system that makes two types of engineered <I>E.coli</I> play “Romeo and Juliet”. We represented the four scenes with concentration of signal molecules 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL. 3OC6HSL is synthesized by LuxI enzyme in cell Romeo, and 3OC12HSL is synthesized by LasI enzyme in Juliet cell. To reproduce the four scenes, we designed three subsystems: '''positive feedback system''', '''band detect system''', and '''communication-inverter dependent suicide system'''.  

Revision as of 13:33, 25 September 2012

bar

Tokyotechlogo2012.png

cell-cell communication

Contents

Ⅰ-0 Abstract

We designed a cell-cell communication system that makes two types of engineered E.coli play “Romeo and Juliet”. We represented the four scenes with concentration of signal molecules 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL. 3OC6HSL is synthesized by LuxI enzyme in cell Romeo, and 3OC12HSL is synthesized by LasI enzyme in Juliet cell. To reproduce the four scenes, we designed three subsystems: positive feedback system, band detect system, and communication-inverter dependent suicide system.

First, we achieved complete positive feedback system for “Scene1 Fall in love” by construction and characterization of two important parts: Plux-LasI and Plas-LuxI. We confirmed that 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell synthesized enough concentration of 3OC12HSL to induce the Las reporter. In the presence of 3OC6HSL, the fluorescence intensity of Las reporter became 42 times stronger than that of Las reporter in the absence of 3OC6HSL (fig1). We also confirmed that 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell synthesized enough concentration of 3OC6HSL to induce the Lux reporter. In the presence of 3OC12HSL, the fluorescence intensity of Las reporter became 116 times stronger than that of Las reporter in the absence of 3OC12HSL. (fig2). Then, to accomplish the complete positive feedback system, we confirmed that the production of a signal activates the production of the other signal, when both type of cell coexist. GFP was expressed in both Las reporter and Lux reporter only when the supernatant of co-culture in which both 3OC12HSL dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell and 3OC6HSL dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell were contained was used as inducer (fig3).

Second, to accomplish the 3OC6HSL-dependent band detect system for “Scene2 Juliet’s deathlike sleep”, we characterized Lux/Tet hybrid promoter which is important part for our band detect system. Plux/tet-GFP expressed fluorescence only in the presence of both 3OC6HSL and aTc. In this situation, the fluorescence intensity became 521 times than that in the absence of both inducers (fig4).

Third, to represent “Scene3 Romeo’s suicide” and “Scene4 Juliet’s suicide”, we constructed two communication inverters: Plux-LacI and Plas-LacI. Plux-LacI expresses LacI repressor in the presence of 3OC6HSL. On the other hand, Plas-LacI expresses LacI repressor in the presence of 3OC12HSL.

fig1,
fig2,
fig3,
fig4,










Story

We make our cute E.coli play “Romeo and Juliet” which is one of Shakespeare’s most famous plays. In this project, we define the signal that E.coli produce as the romantic feeling of Romeo and Juliet. In this project, we will recreate the love story of "Romeo&Juliette", by using "Cell-cell communication"

TokyotechStory.png

The story that we reproduce is divided into four scenes.

(Scene 1) Romeo and Juliet encountered and they fell in love with each other.

(Scene 2) However, providence lane person, this period of pure love might never broom since they were born in two feuding families. In order to keep their relationship, Juliet planned to pretend die by drinking the drug that will put her into a death like coma so that when she woke up there will be no obstacle between their great loves.

(Scene 3) However, this new was not conveyed to Romeo in time. Romeo misunderstood Juliet’s death and committed suicide.

(Scene 4) When Juliet woke up, what waiting for her was not a beautiful future but Romeo’s death that is waiting for her. Juliet felt so sad and she followed Romeo by stabbing herself with a dirk.

Design of genetic circuit

video1 Behavior of our circuit for “Romeo and Juliet”


fig5,gene circuit overview



Pon: promoter which is turned on.

Plux: promoter activated by LuxR/3OC6HSL complex.

Plas: promoter activated by LasR/3OC12HSL complex.

Plac: promoter repressed by LacI.

Plux/tet: hybrid promoter activated by LuxR/3OC6HSL complex and repressed by TetR








We designed a cell-cell communication system that makes two types of engineered E.coli play “Romeo and Juliet”. We represented the story with concentration of signal molecules 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL. 3OC6HSL is synthesized by LuxI in Romeo cell, and 3OC12HSL is synthesized by LasI in Juliet cell. To reproduce the four scenes, we designed three subsystems.

First, to represent “Scene1 Fall in love”, we designed a positive feedback system in which the production of a signal activates the production of the other signal.

Second, we applied a 3OC6HSL-dependent band detect system to represent “Scene2 Juliet’s deathlike sleep” by a stop of 3OC12HSL production. When the concentration of 3OC6HSL reaches higher level by the positive feedback, the concentration of TetR is enough level to repress the expression of LasI, and the production of 3OC12HSL is stopped.

Third, to realize “Scene3 Romeo’s suicide” in response to Juliet’s deathlike sleep, we designed 3OC12HSL dependent LacI inverter. When Juliet cell is in deathlike sleep, supply of 3OC12HSL is stopped. In the absence of 3OC12HSL, the lysis gene is expressed and Romeo cell dies.

Finally, to realize “Scene4 Juliet’s suicide” in response to Romeo’s suicide, we also designed 3OC6HSL dependent LacI inverter. After the death of Romeo cell, supply of 3OC6HSL is stopped, and the expression of LacI is stopped. As a result, the lysis gene is expressed and Juliet cell dies.

Scene 1 Fall in love: positive feedback system
fig6,Scene1 positive feedback system

The love between Romeo and Juliet is realized by positive feedback of cell-cell communication signals (fig6). In our positive feedback system, two types of E.coli communicate and regulate each other’s production of signal. An increase of one signal causes the increase of the other signal production, resulting in the increase of the signal itself. For the positive feedback system, two quorum sensing modules, LuxI/LuxR and LasI/LasR, which enable two-way communication, were used. Juliet cell expresses LuxR, which is a 3OC6HSL-dependent transcriptional regulator, constitutively. While Romeo cell expresses LasR, which is a 3OC12HSL-dependent transcriptional regulator constitutively. In cell Juliet, LuxR bound with signal 3OC6HSL, and LuxR/3OC6HSL complex activates the expression of LasI. In the mean time, 3OC12HSL produced in Juliet cell is bound by LasR. LasR/3OC12HSL complex activates the expression of LuxI. LuxI and LasI are signal synthesizing enzymes, so the concentration of signal molecules becomes higher when the transcription of LuxI and LasI is activated. The higher concentration of signal molecules, the more complexes exist in each cell, and the activation of signal senders gets stronger. As a result, the increase of the signal synthesis is accelerated.

Scene 2 Play dead: band detect network
fig7,band detect system

The “Juliet’s deathlike sleep” that is represented by the stop of 3OC12HSL production is realized by 3OC6HSL-dependent band detect system (fig7). The band detect system is composed of TetR whose expression is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex and LasI whose expression is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex and TetR. When the concentration of 3OC6HSL reaches the moderate level, LuxR-3OC6HSL complex moderately activates the expression of TetR and LasI. In this situation, the concentration of TetR is not enough to repress the expression of LasI. Thus, Juliet cell produces 3OC12HSL. As the concentration of 3OC6HSL reaches higher level by the positive feedback, the concentration of TetR reaches to enough level to repress LasI expression. As a result, 3OC12HSL production by Juliet cell is stopped.


Scene 3 Romeo suicide: inverter
fig8,communication dependent inverter

“Romeo’s suicide” in response to Juliet’s deathlike sleep is realized by 3OC12HSL-dependent LacI inverter system (fig8). In the presence of 3OC12HSL, LacI whose expression is regulated by LasR/3OC12HSL complex represses the expression of the lysis gene. Thus, Romeo cell keeps alive when Juliet cell produces 3OC12HSL. However, when Juliet cell is in death like coma, supply of 3OC12HSL is stopped and then the expression of LacI is also stopped. In the absence of LacI, the lysis gene is expressed and Romeo cell dies.





Scene 4 Juliet suicide: inverter
fig9,communication dependent inverter

“Juliet’s suicide” in response to Romemo’s suicide is realied by 3OC6HSL-dependent LacI inverter system (fig9). Juliet cell can keep alive in the presence of 3OC6HSL, because LacI whose expression is regulated by LuxR/3OC6HSL complex represses the lysis gene. After the death of Romeo cell, supply of 3OC6HSL is stopped, and the expression of LacI is stopped. As a result, lysis gene is expressed and Juliet cell dies.




Assays for Positive feedback system

fig10

The positive feedback in the Romeo and Juliet cell-cell communication system is composed of two types of the engineered cells, 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell (Plux-LasI cell) and 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell (Plas-LuxI cell). In this positive feedback system, 3OC6HSL produced by Plas-LuxI cell activates the production of 3OC12HSL by Plux-LasI cell, and vice versa. For the implementation of the positive feedback system, several new Biobrick parts are required (Fig10). [Constraction]





Construction of the 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL production module

fig11

For construction of the 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL production module, we first constructed a new part Plux-LasI. Plux-LasI cell is an engineered E.coli that contains a 3OC6HSL dependent LasI generator and a constitutive LuxR generator. As the 3OC6HSL dependent LasI generator, we constructed a new Biobrick part Plux-LasI (BBa_K934022) by combining Plux promoter (BBa_R0062) and LasI (BBa_K081016 ). As a constitutive LuxR generator, we used Ptet-LuxR (BBa_S03119). By introducing Plux-LasI and Ptet-LuxR into E.coli strain JM 2.300, we constructed Plux-LasI cell. Then we performed a reporter assay by using Plux-LasI cell to characterize the function of Plux-LasI. As the negative control of 3OC12HSL production, 3OC12HSL non-producer cell (⊿P-LasI cell) that contains promoterless-LasI(BBa_K081016) instead of Plux-LasI and Ptet-LuxR was prepared (Fig11).

The⊿P-LasI cell does not produce 3OC12HSL even though 3OC6HSL existed. The supernatants of the cultures of these modules were used as the inducer in the reporter assay. We prepared four inducer conditions as follow.

A) “Plux-LasI cell” without 3OC6HSL induction

B) “Plux-LasI cell” with 3OC6HSL induction

C) “⊿P-LasI cell” without 3OC6HSL induction

D) “⊿P-LasI cell” with 3OC6HSL induction

fig12

Using the supernatant of the four culture conditions, we performed the reporter assay. In the reporter assay, we used a Las reporter strain that contains Ptrc-LasR and Plas-GFP (BBa_K649001). Also, a reporter cell that expresses GFP constitutively and a reporter cell that does not express GFP were used as the positive control and the negative control, respectively.



fig13

Figure (13) shows that fluorescence intensities by the reporter cells dependent on different inducers. Only when inducer B was used, the fluorescence intensity of the Las reporter cell increased while other three inducers did not affect. Comparing the results of the inducer A and B, it can be said that with the induction of 3OC6HSL, the fluorescence intensity of the LasI reporter cell increased by 42-folds. This result indicates that Plux-LasI cell produced 3OC12HSL in response to 3OC6HSL induction by the function of Plux-LasI. From this experiment, we confirmed that a new part Plux-LasI synthesized enough concentration of 3OC12HSL to induce the Las reporter cell. This Plux-LasI is the improved device of LasI. We succeed in constructing new LasI device that can be regulated by 3OC6HSL induction....[Protocol]


Construction of the 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL production module

fig14

For construction of the 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL production module, we first constructed a new part Plas-LuxI. Plas-LuxI is an engineered E.coli that contains a 3OC12HSL dependent LuxI generator and a constitutive LasR generator. As the 3OC12HSL dependent LuxI generator, we constructed a new Biobrick part Plas-LuxI (BBa_K934012) by combining Plas promoter (BBa_K649000) and LuxI (BBa_C0061). As a constitutive LasR generator, we used Ptrc-LasR. By introducing Plas-LuxI and Ptrc-LasR into E.coli strain JM 2.300, we constructed the Plas-LuxI cell. Then we performed a reporter assay by using Plas-LuxI cell to characterize the function of Plas-LuxI. As the negative control of 3OC6HSL production, ⊿P-LuxI cell that contains promoterless-LuxI (BBa_K081008) instead of Plas-LuxI and Ptrc-LasR was prepared.

The ⊿P-LuxI cell does not produce 3OC6HSL even though 3OC12HSL existed. The supernatants of the cultures of these modules were used as the inducer in the reporter assay. We prepared four inducer conditions as follow.

E) “Plas-LuxI cell” without 3OC12HSL induction

F) “Plas-LuxI cell” with 3OC12HSL induction

G) “⊿P-LuxI cell” without 3OC12HSL induction

H) “⊿P-LuxI cell” with 3OC12HSL induction

fig15

Using the supernatant of the four culture conditions, we performed the reporter assay. In the reporter assay, we used a Lux reporter strain that contains Ptet-LuxR and Plux-GFP (BBa_K395100). Also, a reporter cell that expresses GFP constitutively and a reporter cell that does not express GFP were used as the positive control and the negative control, respectively.

fig16

Figure (16) shows that fluorescence intensities by the reporter cells dependent on different inducers. Only when inducer F was used, the fluorescence intensity of the Lux reporter cell increased while other three inducers did not affect. Comparing the results of the inducer E and F, it can be said that with the induction of 3OC6HSL, the fluorescence intensity of the Lux reporter cell increased by 116-folds. This result indicates that Plas-LuxI cell produced 3OC6HSL in response to 3OC12HSL induction by the function of Plas-LuxI. From this experiment, we confirmed that a new part Plas-LuxI synthesized enough concentration of 3OC6HSL to induce the Lux reporter cell. This Plas-LuxI is the improved device of LuxI. We succeed in constructing new LuxI device that can be regulated by 3OC12HSL induction....[Protocol]





Construction of the positive feedback system

fig17
fig18

To accomplish complete positive feedback system, we mixed and co-cultured Plux-LasI cell and Plas-LuxI cell. As a control co-culture, ⊿P-LasI cell and⊿P-LuxI cell were mixed. As a trigger of the positive feedback system, we added 3OC6HSL ( nM) or 3OC12HSL ( nM) to co-culture. With no-induction control, we thus prepared six conditions (fig17). To confirm that both 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL are produced in the positive feedback, HSLs content in the supernatant of the co-culture were evaluated by Las reporter strain and Lux reporter strain.

In these co-cultures, following behavior would be expected. In the condition I, 3OC6HSL induces 3OC12HSL production of Plux-LasI cell. Then, 3OC12HSL synthesized by Plux-LasI cell induces Plas-LuxI cell. The concentration of 3OC6HSL increases compared to the initial amount. Increased amount of 3OC6HSL induces higher production of 3OC12HSL. As a result, the production of both signals is increased in the condition I (ideal positive feedback behavior). In this situation, the concentration of 3OC6HSL is higher than the initial concentration of 3OC6HSL. Similarly in the condition II, total amount of 3OC12HSL also increases compared to the initial amount. In the condition III, either signal is not produced because of any inducer. In condition IV and V, little amount of 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL are remained without degradation, respectively.

Fig18 shows that the fluorescence intensity of the Lux reporter in the condition I was XX-fold higher than that in the condition IV. 3OC12HSL production of Plux-LasI cell activates 3OC6HSL production. Similarly, the fulorescence intensity of the Las reporeter in the condition II was XX-fold higher than that in the condition V. From these results, it is suggested that the production of 3OC6HSL and 3OC12HSL increased by positive feedback by combination of Plas-LuxI cell and Plux-LasI cell....[Protocol]

Conclusion of positive feedback system

fig10

In this study, we designed and implemented a positive feedback system that is composed of the 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell and the 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell. First, we constructed the working 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL production module and characterized Plux-LasI (BBa_K934022), the improved device of LasI that can be regulated by 3OC6HSL induction. Also, we constructed the 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL production module. Then we confirmed that these work. In the process of the implementation, we constructed two new Biobrick parts Plux-LasI and Plas-LuxI and characterized their functions.

To accomplish the positive feedback system (Fig.X), we prepared two types of genetically engineered E.coli, 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell and 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell. First, we confirmed that 3OC6HSL-dependent 3OC12HSL producer cell synthesized enough concentration of 3OC12HSL to induce the Las reporter (Fig.XX) and 3OC12HSL-dependent 3OC6HSL producer cell synthesized enough concentration of 3OC6HSL to induce the Lux reporter (Fig.XXX). Then, we confirmed that the production of a signal activates the production of the other signal, when both type of cell coexist (Fig. XXXX)


Band detect system

Lux-Tet hybrid promoter assay

fig19
fig20
fig21
fig22

The band detect system for cell-cell communication system is composed of Plux/tet–LasI, Plux-TetR, and Pon-LuxR. In Plux/tet-LasI, the expression of target gene, in this case, LasI is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex and TetR. In Plux-TetR, the expression of TetR is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex. Since Pon-LuxR constitutively express LuxR, the regulations of Plux/tet hybrid promoter and Plux promoter are determined by the concentration of 3OC6HSL. (fig19)

When the concentration of 3OC6HSL is initial level, LuxR-3OC6HSLcomplex activates the expression of TetR and LasI.(fig20)




As the concentration of 3OC6HSL increases to moderate level gradually by the positive feedback system, the expression of TetR and LasI also increases. In this situation, the concentration of TetR is still not enough to repress the expression of LasI and 3OC12HSL is produced.(fig21)


When the concentration of 3OC6HSL is high level, the concentration of TetR reaches to the enough level to repress LasI expression.(fig22)

As the result, the production of 3OC12HSL is stopped and the 3OC6HSL supply from Romeo cell is stopped. Then the LuxR-3OC6HSL complex cannot form and the expression of LasI is stopped. For the implementation of the band detect system, Lux/Tet hybrid promoter is required. [Material & Method]

result

fig23,Lux/Tet hybrid promoter assay

For construction of the band detect system, we developed a new part Lux/Tet hybrid promoter (BBa_K934024). The Lux/Tet hybrid promoter, which is composed of a LuxR operator and two TetR operators, activates the expression of the downstream gene only when LuxR-3OC6HSL complex exists and TetR does not exist. To characterize the function of the Lux/Tet hybrid promoter, we constructed a part Plux/tet-GFP (BBa_K934024) by inserting the promoter in front of a GFP coding sequence. By using the reporter cell that contains Plux/tet-GFP and constitutive LuxR and TetR generator (PlacIq-LuxR-TetR), we measured the fluorescence intensity of the reporter cell dependent on the four different combinations of two inducers, 3OC6HSL and aTc (anhydrous tetracycline). In the absence of the both inducers, the culture with Plux-tet hybrid promoter-gfp showed the background–fluorescence intensity generated by promoterless-rbs-gfp on pSB3K3. The presence of either 3OC6HSL or aTc alone had little effect on increasing the fluorescence intensity. In the presence of both inducers, the culture showed about 700-fold higher fluorescence intensity than that in the absence of both inducers. This result confirmed that the assembly of the luxR operator and the two TetR operators integrated the inputs of 3OCH6HSL and aTc into the output of GFP transcription. We also characterized a Plux/tet hybrid promoter BBa_K17600. , which was developed by USTC 2009. As shown in fig23, fluorescence intensity was increased when only 3OC6HSL was added to the reporter cell. This result indicates that BBa_K17600 is a defective as a Plux/tet hybrid promoter, which is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex and TetR. [Material & Method]

Discussion

In this study, we improved Plux/tet hybrid promoter parts by developing a new Plux/tet hybrid promoter that is regulated by LuxR-3OC6HSL and TetR. Even though a former team had developed a Plux/tet hybrid promoter (BBa_K17600), it activated the expression without aTc induction. This result indicates that BBa_K17600 cannot be called Plux/tet hybrid promoter because it was not regulated by TetR. On the other hand, our Plux/tet hybrid promoter activates the expression only when both 3OC6HSL and aTc were induced. Therefore our work in this section can be considered as the improvement of Plux/tet hybrid promoter parts in the Biobrick Registry.

Conclusion

For construction of the band detect system, we designed and characterized a Lux/Tet hybrid promoter. We designed the new promoter that is activated by LuxR-3OC6HSL complex and repressed by TetR. We confirmed that the Lux/Tet hybrid promoter activated the expression of GFP only when both 3OC6HSL and aTc were added.

Communication dependent inverter

In order to reproduce the story of “Romeo & Juliet”, the communication dependent inverter system which lysis is repressed under the high concentration of signals and is expressed under the low concentration of signals is required. We decide to use part (BBa-K358019BBa_K358019) to represent the suicide of Romeo and Juliet. Therefore, we construct 3OC12HSL dependent inverter Plas/lacI and 3OC6HSL dependent inverter Plux/lacI.

3OC12HSL dependent

construction

We constructed a 3OC12HSL-dependent inverter (BBa_K934016) by ligating PlasI (BBa_K649000) to the upstream of rbs-LacI-ter (BBa_I732820).

3OC6HSL dependent

construction

We constructed a 3OC6HSL-dependent inverter (BBa_K934026) by ligating Plux (BBa_R0062) to the upstream of rbs-LacI-ter (BBa_I732820).

Modeling

To build our cell-cell communication system, we have constructed and characterized several important parts and modules by experiments. However, it is unconfirmed whether E.coli can play all the drama completely. To confirm the feasibility of our cell-cell communication system, we conducted the following simulation.

Model development

To simulate the cell-cell communication system, we developed an ordinary differential equation model. The equations used in the model are shown in figure(X). [Model development]

figure(X): The equations used in the model


Result1: Whether our circuit can reproduce “Romeo and Juliet”

To confirm the feasibility of the cell-cell communication system, we simulated the system under typical experimental conditions. Figure(X) shows the result of the simulation about time-dependent change of the concentrations of the two signals.

figure(X): The equations used in the model

We verified the time-dependent behavior of the signal concentration by referring to “Romeo and Juliet” scenes. As described below, the behavior of the signal concentration is consistent with the development of the story.

figure(X): The equations used in the model
figure(X): The equations used in the model

In the gray area of Figure(Xa), the concentration of two signals increases. It looks as if Romeo and Juliet fall in love.

In the green area of Figure(Xa), as the concentration of Romeo signals increases to the some extent, the concentration of Juliet signals starts to decline. It looks like Juliet’s deathlike sleep.

In the blue area of Figure(Xa), lysis gene is expressed in Romeo cell in response to the decline of the concentration of Juliet signals, and the concentration of Romeo signals starts to decline. This represents the suicide of Romeo. In the story, he thought Juliet was dead, and killed himself.

In the pink area of Figure(Xa), lysis gene is expressed in Juliet cell in response to the decline of the concentration of Romeo signals, and the concentration of Juliet signals decreases further. As a result, the concentration of two signals forms a pattern of decline. This represents well that Juliet noticed Romeo’s suicide and followed him afterwards.

Result2: Validation of three subsystems’ function

In [result 1], we demonstrated that the behavior of signal concentration is consistent with the “Romeo and Juliet” story. Next, in this [result 2], we confirmed that the behavior of signal concentration is certainly caused by three subsystems’ function. We confirmed the function of three subsystems (Positive feedback system, Band detect system, and Communication-inverter dependent suicide system). In the Positive feedback system, two kinds of signals increase their concentration mutually. In the Band detect system, the repressor protein (TetR) is expressed in the particular range of the Romeo signal concentration. In the Communication-inverter dependent suicide system, the expression of lysis proteins is repressed in the presence of signals and is promoted in the absence of signals.

figure(X): The equations used in the model
figure(X): The equations used in the model
figure(X): The equations used in the model






(1)Positive feedback system

To confirm the importance of the positive feedback in our cell-cell communication system, we simulated the behavior of the systems with and without positive feedback. In addition to the complete cell-cell communication system, we prepared two systems without positive feedback. First, we prepared the constitutively signal producing system. In that system, LuxI (proteins that generate Romeo signals) and LasI (proteins that generate Juliet signals) are constitutively expressed (Figure(XX)). Second, we prepared the separately cultured cells system (Figure(XXX)). In that system, Romeo cells and Juliet cells are cultured separately.


In Figure(X), the behavior of signal concentration in the complete cell-cell communication system is shown. As a comparison, in Figure(XX), the concentration of Romeo signals and Juliet signals increases slightly at first, but starts to decline before rising sufficiently. In Figure(XXX), the concentration of Romeo signals decreases while Juliet signals increases. That is to say, the cell-cell communication system without positive feedback is unsuitable for reproduction of “Romeo and Juliet” and we confirmed the importance of the positive feedback in our cell-cell communication system.

(difference between parameters of two system? : Yasuo)


(2)Band detect system

Next, we confirmed the function of the Band detect system. Figure(X) and Figure(XX) show the concentration change of the output signals responding to the concentration change of input signals.

In Romeo cells, the production of Romeo signals increases monotonically with the increase of Juliet signals.


On the other hand, in Juliet cells, the production of Juliet signals is in the largest quantities under the particular range of Romeo signal concentration. However, the production of Juliet signals is kept in a low level in the situation of low and high Romeo signals concentration.

In this manner, the validity of Band detect system in Juliet cells was proven by modeling.

Incidentally, the first band detect system in synthetic biology was constructed by Ron Weiss et al. in 2005. In that system, there are two repressors, LacI and LacIμ, that have different repression efficiencies for the LacI promoter. The expression of two repressors is suitably controlled depending on the concentration of signal molecules (3OC6HSL), so the LacI promoter is activated under the particular range of the concentration of signals (3OC6HSL). Compared with that system, our new band detect system has a merit. That is to say, our system is constructed with fewer components. In our system, we employ the Lux-Tet hybrid promoter. The promoter is activated by Lux-3OC6HSL complex and is inhibited by TetR protein. Besides, the expression of TetR is activated only in the situation of high concentration of Lux-3OC6HSL complex. In this way, the hybrid promoter is activated under the middle concentration of signals.


(3)Communication-inverter dependent suicide system – in Romeo cell

To confirm the function of the Communication-inverter dependent suicide system in Romeo cell, we examined the relation between the concentration of Juliet signals and the population of Romeo cells.

On the Line(1) in Figure(X), when the concentration of Juliet signals is high (Figure(Xa)), the expression of LacI (proteins that inhibit lysis gene) is promoted strongly in Romeo cells. Thus, the expression of lysis proteins in Romeo cells is inhibited (Figure(Xb)). As a result, the population of Romeo cells increases (Figure(Xc)). On the other hand, on the Line(2) in Figure(X), when the concentration of Juliet signals is low (Figure(Xa)), the expression of lysis proteins in Romeo cells is promoted (Figure(Xb)). Thus, the population of Romeo cells decreases (Figure(Xc)).



In this way, we verified that there was a negative correlation between the concentration of Juliet signals and the expression of lysis proteins in Romeo cells. Furthermore, we confirmed that the increase and decrease of Romeo cells is dependent on the concentration change of Juliet signals. Therefore, it is well shown that the Communication-inverter dependent suicide system in Romeo cell is correctly functioning.



(4)Communication-inverter dependent suicide system – in Juliet cell

Next, to confirm the function of Communication-inverter dependent suicide system in Juliet cell, we examined the relation between the concentration of Romeo signals and the population of Juliet cells.

On the Line(1) in Figure(X), when the concentration of Romeo signals is high (Figure(Xa)), the expression of LacI(proteins that inhibit lysis gone) is promoted strongly in Juliet cells. Thus, the expression of lysis proteins in Juliet cells is inhibited (Figure(Xb)). As a result, the decrease of the Juliet cell population stops. (Figure(Xc)). On the other hand, on the Line(2) in Figure(X), when the concentration of Romeo signals is low (Figure(Xa)), the expression of lysis proteins in Juliet cells is promoted (Figure(Xb)). Thus, the population of Juliet cells decreases (Figure(Xc)).

In this way, we verified that there was a negative correlation between the concentration of Romeo signals and the expression of lysis proteins in Juliet cells. Furthermore, we confirmed that the increase and decrease of Juliet cells is dependent on the concentration change of Romeo signals. Therefore, it is well shown that the Communication-inverter dependent suicide system in Juliet cell is correctly functioning.

Perspective

Text

References

Text