Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Radiation

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(13 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Introduction" id="project">Hell Cell:</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Introduction" id="project">Hell Cell:</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Introduction">Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Introduction">Introduction</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Plasmid">Test Plasmid</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Cold">Cold</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Cold">Cold</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Desiccation">Desiccation</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Desiccation">Desiccation</a></li>
<li id="active"><a href="#" id="current">Radiation</a></li>
<li id="active"><a href="#" id="current">Radiation</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/pH">pH</a></li>
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/pH">pH</a></li>
-
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/Plasmid">Test Plasmid</a></li>
+
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/Parts">BioBricks</a></li>
-
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/HellCell/BioBricks">BioBricks</a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pe9voM2l_nrVJk0hwzJ6z6tCCMn9ckykVNX5nLZ8qGg/edit">Lab Notebook</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="/Team:Stanford-Brown/Protocols">Protocols</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Line 16: Line 18:
{{:Team:Stanford-Brown/Templates/Content}}
{{:Team:Stanford-Brown/Templates/Content}}
-
=='''Radiation''' ==
+
== '''Radiation''' <br> <br> <font size = 2.5> <u> At a glance</u> <br> Extremophile: ''Deinococcus radiodurans'' <br> Proteins of interest: Recombinase A, DNA-binding proteins from starved cells 1 and 2, Superoxide Dismutases Cu/Zn and Mn, Manganese Transporter MntH <br> Consensus: Inconclusive </font> ==
-
<html>
+
 
-
<i>Deinococcus radiodurans </i>
+
''Deinococcus radiodurans'' is an extremely radiation-resistant bacterium: while about 10 Gy (absorbed radiation dose, Gray) can kill most vertebrates, ''D. radiodurans'' can withstand up to 12,000 Gy. Current research has found that ''D. radiodurans’'' unique genetic makeup allows it to better handle radiation exposure. The two main effects of radiation exposure to bacterial cells are DNA damage and the creation of toxic superoxide species (Daly 2009). Two DNA damage prevention and repair proteins in ''D. radiodurans'' have been shown to outperform analogs in less radiation-tolerant bacteria. The recombinational repair protein Recombinase A (or recA) from ''D. radiodurans'' is much more effective at protecting DNA from damage than that from ''E. coli'' (Slade and Miroslav 2011). By binding to DNA, the proteins Dps-1 and Dps-2 (DNA-binding proteins from starved cells) protect it from the reactive superoxide species formed by ionizing radiation (Slade and Miroslav 2011). To remove superoxides, superoxide dismutases are expressed in high levels in ''D. radiodurans'' (Slade and Miroslav 2011). These enzymes break the reactive species down into harmless oxygen and hydrogen peroxides. There are two different types of these dismutases in ''D. radiodurans'', one that uses copper and zinc as cofactors and another that uses manganese (Gao, Zhang, Song, Chen, and Zhong 2009). Manganese is also a cofactor for many other radiation stress mechanisms in the cell, and so manganese transporters bring manganese into the cell during radiation stress. These transporters are particularly well-known in ''D. radiodurans'', and expressing these proteins in ''E. coli'' has shown promise (Haiyan and Baoming 2010).
-
<br>
+
 
-
This organism imports high levels of manganese, which has been shown to confer radiation resistance for unknown reasons. We are trying to isolate this manganese transporter, as well as its DNA repair mechanisms and superoxide scavengers.  
+
So the Hell Cell squad assimilated all of this information to isolate the genes for recA, Dps-1, Dps-2, Sod Cu/Zn, Sod Mn, MntH from ''Deinococcus radiodurans'' and put them each into the Test Plasmid for expression in ''E. coli''.
-
</html>
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''Assay'''
 +
 
 +
Liquid cultures of NEB5α ''E. coli'' transformed with MntH, recA, sod Cu/Zn, Dps 1 (Sod Mn and Dps 2 constructs could not be completely assembled in time), and negative control were grown up over night at 37°C. The following day, the cells were washed and resuspended in 0.9% NaCl solution. Cell concentration was then adjusted to 10^7/mL in 5mL of a glass Petri dish. Each sample was then exposed to 1.2 J/(m^2*sec) of UV-C radiation from a UV lamp for a cumulative of 0 seconds, 2 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 20 seconds, and 30 seconds. After each exposure, a dilution spot assay was conducted to determine the final number of surviving cells.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Radiation.png|800px|center]]
 +
 
 +
Figure 1: Displays survival of negative control, MntH construct, recA construct, Sod Cu/Zn construct, and Dps construct transformed E. coli after specific dosages of UV-C radiation.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Conclusions'''
 +
 
 +
The results of assaying radiation resistance constructs seem to indicate that there may be one genetic part that is successful. In Figure 1, it can be clearly seen that ''E. coli'' transformed with the Dps construct tended to survive at higher percentages for any given UV-C dosage. 10% survivability was witnessed in all constructs other than dps at levels lower than 5 J/m^2; however, these results seem to indicate that dps may have 10% survivability at levels as high as 10 J/m^2. In this assay, only one replicate of each sample was able to be assayed; however, further replicates of this assay have displayed inconsistencies in the relationship between survivability and UV-C dosage. Thus, although this assay may indicate that the dps construct conveys radiation resistance, further and more accurate assays need to be conducted in order to reach a definitive conclusion.
 +
 
 +
Sources:
 +
 
 +
Daly, M.J. (2009) A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. ''Nature Rev. Microbiol, 7'': 237-245.
 +
 
 +
Slade, D. and Miroslav, R. (2011). Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. ''Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 75''(1):  133-191.
 +
 
 +
Gao, N., Ma, B., Zhang, Y., Song, Q., Chen, L., Zhong H. (2009). Gene expression analysis of four radiation-resistant bacteria. ''Genomics Insights, 2'', 11-22.
 +
 
 +
Haiyan, S., Baoming, T. (2010). Radioresistance analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans gene DR1709 in Escherichia coli. African ''Journal of Microbiol. Research, 4''(13): 1412-1418.

Latest revision as of 02:16, 4 October 2012


Radiation

At a glance
Extremophile: Deinococcus radiodurans
Proteins of interest: Recombinase A, DNA-binding proteins from starved cells 1 and 2, Superoxide Dismutases Cu/Zn and Mn, Manganese Transporter MntH
Consensus: Inconclusive

Deinococcus radiodurans is an extremely radiation-resistant bacterium: while about 10 Gy (absorbed radiation dose, Gray) can kill most vertebrates, D. radiodurans can withstand up to 12,000 Gy. Current research has found that D. radiodurans’ unique genetic makeup allows it to better handle radiation exposure. The two main effects of radiation exposure to bacterial cells are DNA damage and the creation of toxic superoxide species (Daly 2009). Two DNA damage prevention and repair proteins in D. radiodurans have been shown to outperform analogs in less radiation-tolerant bacteria. The recombinational repair protein Recombinase A (or recA) from D. radiodurans is much more effective at protecting DNA from damage than that from E. coli (Slade and Miroslav 2011). By binding to DNA, the proteins Dps-1 and Dps-2 (DNA-binding proteins from starved cells) protect it from the reactive superoxide species formed by ionizing radiation (Slade and Miroslav 2011). To remove superoxides, superoxide dismutases are expressed in high levels in D. radiodurans (Slade and Miroslav 2011). These enzymes break the reactive species down into harmless oxygen and hydrogen peroxides. There are two different types of these dismutases in D. radiodurans, one that uses copper and zinc as cofactors and another that uses manganese (Gao, Zhang, Song, Chen, and Zhong 2009). Manganese is also a cofactor for many other radiation stress mechanisms in the cell, and so manganese transporters bring manganese into the cell during radiation stress. These transporters are particularly well-known in D. radiodurans, and expressing these proteins in E. coli has shown promise (Haiyan and Baoming 2010).

So the Hell Cell squad assimilated all of this information to isolate the genes for recA, Dps-1, Dps-2, Sod Cu/Zn, Sod Mn, MntH from Deinococcus radiodurans and put them each into the Test Plasmid for expression in E. coli.


Assay

Liquid cultures of NEB5α E. coli transformed with MntH, recA, sod Cu/Zn, Dps 1 (Sod Mn and Dps 2 constructs could not be completely assembled in time), and negative control were grown up over night at 37°C. The following day, the cells were washed and resuspended in 0.9% NaCl solution. Cell concentration was then adjusted to 10^7/mL in 5mL of a glass Petri dish. Each sample was then exposed to 1.2 J/(m^2*sec) of UV-C radiation from a UV lamp for a cumulative of 0 seconds, 2 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 20 seconds, and 30 seconds. After each exposure, a dilution spot assay was conducted to determine the final number of surviving cells.

Radiation.png

Figure 1: Displays survival of negative control, MntH construct, recA construct, Sod Cu/Zn construct, and Dps construct transformed E. coli after specific dosages of UV-C radiation.


Conclusions

The results of assaying radiation resistance constructs seem to indicate that there may be one genetic part that is successful. In Figure 1, it can be clearly seen that E. coli transformed with the Dps construct tended to survive at higher percentages for any given UV-C dosage. 10% survivability was witnessed in all constructs other than dps at levels lower than 5 J/m^2; however, these results seem to indicate that dps may have 10% survivability at levels as high as 10 J/m^2. In this assay, only one replicate of each sample was able to be assayed; however, further replicates of this assay have displayed inconsistencies in the relationship between survivability and UV-C dosage. Thus, although this assay may indicate that the dps construct conveys radiation resistance, further and more accurate assays need to be conducted in order to reach a definitive conclusion.

Sources:

Daly, M.J. (2009) A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature Rev. Microbiol, 7: 237-245.

Slade, D. and Miroslav, R. (2011). Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 75(1): 133-191.

Gao, N., Ma, B., Zhang, Y., Song, Q., Chen, L., Zhong H. (2009). Gene expression analysis of four radiation-resistant bacteria. Genomics Insights, 2, 11-22.

Haiyan, S., Baoming, T. (2010). Radioresistance analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans gene DR1709 in Escherichia coli. African Journal of Microbiol. Research, 4(13): 1412-1418.