Revision as of 20:44, 26 October 2012 by Strazkosann (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


For this year's Team Slovenia iGEM project we wanted to exploit the advantages of synthetic biology for an advanced medical therapy which could overcome some of the difficulties connected to current application of biopharmaceuticals.

Each disease and its corresponding therapy is a story of its own, but we sought to design a synthetic biological platform for drug application that could be tailored to the treatment of different diseases and would include safety components that would guarantee safety regardless of the specific therapeutic application.

Our solution was to engineer mammalian cells, so that they would produce and deliver biological drugs inside the organism, as if the drugs were produced by the host cells themselves. The key to any advanced therapy based on this idea is the ability to exert a high level of control on the state of the cells. We have to incorporate genetic switches into the engineered cells allowing controlled production of one or several desired therapeutics, depending on the stage of the disease. We concluded that the engineered cells should be incorporated into microcapsules, which is a safe and well-tested technology that may be implanted into the affected tissue to ensure an immune-privileged environment for the therapeutic cells. The semi-permeable capsule allows a flux of nutrients and effector molecules through the capsule’s pores but prevents cell escape and dissemination throughout the body. For the unlikely case of cells escaping from capsules, we sought to design a safety tag ensuring destruction of cells outside microcapsules by the patient's immune system. This form of therapy should also have the ability to be terminated at any given time by an outside signal that would trigger microcapsule degradation and therapeutic cell apoptosis in which case no traces of the exogenous material should remain in the tissue.

The main features of our proposed therapeutic device:
  1. Production of therapeutic proteins within the organism (no need for purification).
  2. Cell microencapsulation into alginate or another biocompatible carrier to allow application of the same type of validated engineered cells for all patients, to avoid immune response, increase the reliability and predictability of the therapy and decrease the cost by mass production instead of individualized therapeutic engineering of patient's own cells. Microencapsulation also allows localized release of therapeutic proteins into the affected tissue, which can decrease the systemic side effects.
  3. Regulated production of different therapeutic proteins appropriate for different stages of disease. Switching between the different states of therapeutic cells should be possible by a short pulse of an inducer that can be applied to patients orally. This signal should trigger the flip of the bistable switch, which should remain stable in the new state even in the absence of the inducer.
  4. For an advanced therapy we would need several switches in a single cell, which has not yet been demonstrated.
  5. Introduction of an escape tag for the elimination of cells that may escape from microcapsules through augmented targeting by natural killer cells.
  6. At the end of therapy the alginate microcapsule shell should be degraded by a secretory alginate lyase followed by induced apoptosis of the therapeutic cells.

Figure 1. Microencapsulated engineered cells for the production and delivery of biological therapeutics.

An important advantage of the microencapsulated cell approach is that the therapeutic protein can reach therapeutic concentrations locally in the affected tissue, while maintaining a low systemic concentration, thus avoiding systemic side effects, such as systemic immunosuppression. Production of protein therapeutics by implanted microencapsulated cells also eliminates the need for repeated invasive administrations of therapeutics, which are typically applied by injections. Repeated application of therapeutics into the liver, brain or other complex tissues, where local delivery could be beneficial, is quite difficult. The usual obvious solution would be gene therapy, which has, despite its early promises, not delivered many successful clinical applications because of the problems of viral delivery and variable effectiveness caused by the random site of integration. We therefore aimed to develop an implantable cellular device for the local, regulated and safe delivery of therapeutic proteins. Long term survival of encapsulated cells beyond months may however be problematic with current technology and their efficiency of therapeutic production may decrease, although efficient therapy of diabetes and hemophilia using microencapsulated cells has been demonstrated in animals for more than 6months. Nevertheless we concluded that we should focus at least initially on the therapy of acute conditions.

The synthetic biological components that needed to be developed

Universal orthogonal bistable toggle switch for mammalian cells

Figure 2. Regulation of the several different states of therapeutic cells based on several orthogonal toggle switches.
The existing genetic switches used in mammalian cells are mainly based on the available prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, whose number is currently limited and whose properties may differ, hindering balanced switching. Our idea was to investigate the development of orthogonal genetic switches based on designed DNA-binding domains, such as TAL effectors that could support simultaneous introduction of several toggle switches into mammalian cells. Although designed transcription factors have been created based on modular DNA binding proteins, such as zinc fingers and TAL effectors, to our best knowledge there have been no reports of genetic switches based on these types of elements. These devices would be extremely valuable since we could produce numerous orthogonal switches allowing development of complex control functions and therapeutic devices.

Safety mechanisms for therapy with microencapsulated cells

For the safe therapeutic implementation of microencapsulated engineered cells in the organism we envisioned that we should be able to cease the therapy without having to physically remove the capsules. We therefore designed safety mechanisms that allow a complete removal of all exogenous material after the therapy has been completed.

Figure 3. Safety mechanisms that we planned to introduce for the application of microencapsulated engineered mammalian cells in therapy.

Microcapsule degradation - Most of the microcapsules used in literature and therapy are composed of polymerized alginate that is biocompatible but cannot be degraded in mammalian tissues. Alginate lyase harvested from a marine microorganism effectively degrades alginate, so secretion of this enzyme from cells should degrade the capsules and allow their resorption by phagocytic cells.

Termination - We should be able to inactivate the implanted cells at the end of the therapy or at any other stage if the therapy has to be terminated, regardless of the cause. We introduced a safety mechanism that would enable controlled induction of apoptosis of the implanted cells that is leak-free until the selected moment. Therefore we could inactivate therapeutic cells and enable their resorption without causing inflammation.

Escape tag – This ensures that any cell that may have escaped from a microcapsule is eliminated by the immune system of the host organism. The escaped cells would most likely be recognized as foreign in any case but in order to provide maximal safety measures we decided to introduce an additional tag that would alert the natural killer cells of the host immune response.

Next: The switch >>