Team:Peking/Project/Phototaxis/Demonstration

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 21: Line 21:
  <div class="floatC">
  <div class="floatC">
   <img src="/wiki/images/a/ad/Peking2012_Project_taxis2.JPG" alt="Figure 2" style="width:400px" />
   <img src="/wiki/images/a/ad/Peking2012_Project_taxis2.JPG" alt="Figure 2" style="width:400px" />
-
   <p class="description">Figure 2. (a) Wild type MG1655; (b) &Delta;CheZ strain with J23113(medium strength promoter).</p>
+
   <p class="description">Figure 2. (a) Wild type MG1655; (b) &Delta;CheZ strain with J23113 (promoter of medium strength).</p>
  </div>
  </div>
</div>
</div>
</html>{{Template:Peking2012_Color_Epilogue}}
</html>{{Template:Peking2012_Color_Epilogue}}

Revision as of 16:15, 22 September 2012

Behavioral Analysis of Strains: DH5α, ΔcheZ

and Wild Type MG1655

E.coli performs two types of movements: smooth swimming and tumbling, which is decided by rotation. Counter-clockwise rotation leads the bacteria to swim in a straight line, while clock-wise rotation causes the bacteria to tumble in place. As CheZ is essential to determine flagella rotation, we analyzed the motility of DH5 α strain lacking flagella, ΔCheZ strain K12 AMB1655 from Jian-Dong Huang, and wild type MG1655 on semi-solid medium.

During bacterial growth on the semi-solid medium, the energy source where colonies were visible was consumed first, and the possibility of smooth swimming was increased. We expected that wild type MG1655 would diffuse into the surroundings, and ΔCheZ and DH5α would stay in place. The bacterial colonies were grown to mid-exponential phase (OD0.4-0.6) before they were visible on the semi-solid medium. After 20 hours at 30℃, DH5α stayed immobile and formed smooth colonies (Figure 1.a), while the ΔCheZ strain also stayed in place, but formed uneven edges due to tumbling(Figure 1.b). Also wild type MG1655 spread to its surroundings and formed larger colonies in the form of a ring (Figure 1.c). The results show that CheZ indeed influences bacteria motility and thus we can regulate the expression level of CheZ in order to control bacterial behavior.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a)(b)(c) DH5 α, ΔcheZ and wild type MG1655 on semi-solid medium, respectively. The medium contains 5g tryptone, 2.5g yeast extract, 5g NaCl per liter, and 0.25% agar, buffered by HEPES (pH 8.0, final concentration 20mM), and 0.5% (w/v) glycerol was added as the carbon source. 20ml of the above medium was poured into Petri-dish (9cm internal diameter), and harden at 30℃ for 1h. 2μL cell culture(OD0.4-0.6) was spotted at the center of the plate and dried for 15min. Incubated at 30℃ for 20h.

Recovery of Motility

As CheZ influences bacteria behavior, we suspected that bacteria would have different diffusion radius associated with expression level of CheZ. We constructed cheZ under the control of promoters with different strength: BBa_J23112, BBa_J23113, and BBa_J23114, following which these constrcuts were transformed into ΔCheZ strain, respectively. It shows that ΔCheZ strain diffuses and forms larger colonies in the form of a ring similar with wild type MG1655 (FIG 2b). The results indicate that CheZ can be regulated and the expression level of CheZ and bacterial motility have positive correlation.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Wild type MG1655; (b) ΔCheZ strain with J23113 (promoter of medium strength).

  • Totop Totop