Team:Groningen/Notebook/Wetwork 7July2012

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m
Line 9: Line 9:
3.) B.subtilis transformation yesterday was a success for pSac-CM. Both methods show transformants. For BBa_I742123: both methods show no transformant. This is not expected. Ask team Edinburgh?
3.) B.subtilis transformation yesterday was a success for pSac-CM. Both methods show transformants. For BBa_I742123: both methods show no transformant. This is not expected. Ask team Edinburgh?
 +
 +
 +
Renske
 +
 +
Purified cDNA as [[Team:Groningen/Notebook/Wetwork_5July2012|previously]]. Concentrations far too low (22.1 ng/uL). RNA degraded? Wrong handling? --> Ask Arjan to repeat work on Monday.

Revision as of 14:12, 14 July 2012





Emeraldo

1.) pSac-CM isolated yield 200ng/ul

2.) Gel run of gradient PCR. All primers can amplify their fragments in all temperatures: 150alsTF+Rev amplifies 150bp fragment, 250alsTF+Rev amplifies 250bp fragment, 300alsTF+Rev amplifies 300bp fragment, and 500alsTF+Rev amplifies 500bp fragment. Optimal annealing temperature: 58 degree celcius until 60 degree celcius, for all primer sets.

3.) B.subtilis transformation yesterday was a success for pSac-CM. Both methods show transformants. For BBa_I742123: both methods show no transformant. This is not expected. Ask team Edinburgh?


Renske

Purified cDNA as previously. Concentrations far too low (22.1 ng/uL). RNA degraded? Wrong handling? --> Ask Arjan to repeat work on Monday.