Team:Carnegie Mellon/Bio-Submitted

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 126: Line 126:
<h1 class="section1"> Submitted Parts </h1>
<h1 class="section1"> Submitted Parts </h1>
<p>
<p>
-
We have submitted three T7Lac promoter parts to the registry. The followings show the sequences of these constructs.
+
We have submitted three T7Lac promoter parts to the registry. The followings show the sequences of these constructs.</br>
BBa_K613007: TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAA <br>
BBa_K613007: TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAA <br>

Revision as of 21:14, 1 October 2012

Image:CMU_image6.jpeg




Submitted Parts

We have submitted three T7Lac promoter parts to the registry. The followings show the sequences of these constructs.
BBa_K613007: TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAA
Mutant I: TAATGCGACTCACTATAGGACAATTGTGGGCGGACAACAATTCCAA
Mutant II: TAATACGACTCACTACAGGGCGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTCCAA
Mutant III: CAATCCGACTCACTAAAGAGAGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTCCAA

Predicted strength of the hybrid T7Lac promoters

Expected promoter strength of the mutants (relative to BBa_K613007):
Mutant I: <100%
Mutant II: ~100%
Mutant III: ~50%

Expected LacI leaky expression of different mutants:
Mutant I: More than average
Mutant II: Average
Mutant III: Average

RBS used in construct is: CATATG AAGAAGGAGA TATACC

Measured strength of the hybrid T7Lac promoters

Using the model we developed in MATLAB, we calculated the following properties with respect to the wild-type promoter.
Promoter Mutant I Mutant II Mutant III
Transcription Strength 97% 72% 127%
Translational Efficiency 6% 6% 94%
RNA degradation constant (assumed) 100% 100% 100%
Protein degradation constant (fit) 4% 6% 60%
Cheemeng:Need to comment on the results here.

Image:TartanFooter.jpeg