Team:British Columbia/Medal

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 50: Line 50:
<font face=arial narrow size=4><b>Eligibility for Special Prizes</b></br></br></font><font face=arial narrow>
<font face=arial narrow size=4><b>Eligibility for Special Prizes</b></br></br></font><font face=arial narrow>
<b>Best Human Practice Advance:</b></br>
<b>Best Human Practice Advance:</b></br>
-
We wrote <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Patent">A Guide to Patents for iGEM - Ownership, Sharing and Innovation</a> based on our conversations with patent lawyers.</br></br>
+
 
 +
We designed and administered an <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Patent">intellectual property survey</a> to gather high impact data from more than 380 members of the iGEM community. The information was useful to other iGEMers, such as Team INSA Lyon who cited the majority of our data for their human practice. Our team also engaged people outside of the iGEM community, such as a patent agent, patent lawyer, University of British Columbia University-Industry Liaison Office and technical experts.  The end result, with use of feedback from experts and other iGEM teams, was an <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Human_Practices/IP_FAQ">intellectual property guide</a> geared specifically towards the iGEM competition.
 +
 
 +
Human Practices #2 (Desulfurization):
 +
To gain industrial insight, we went to the Chevron refinery in Burnaby, British Columbia, and talked to an industry professional about the processes pertinent to our project.  It demonstrates strides that we have taken towards making our project relevant to real world problems by assessing how our project is applicable to the industrial scen
<b>Best Model:</b></br>
<b>Best Model:</b></br>
</br></br>
</br></br>

Revision as of 03:31, 2 October 2012

British Columbia - 2012.igem.org

Bronze Medal Requirements

Register the team, have a great summer, and plan to have fun at the Regional Jamboree.
Successfully complete and submit this iGEM 2012 Judging form.
Create and share a Description of the team's project using the iGEM wiki and the team's parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts.
Plan to present a Poster and Talk at the iGEM Jamboree.
Enter information detailing at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device in the Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Including:
1. Primary nucleic acid sequence
2. Description of function
3. Authorship
4. Safety notes, if relevant
5. Acknowedgment of sources and references
Submit DNA for at least one new BioBrick Part or Device to the Registry.

Silver Medal Requirements

Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected; characterize the operation of your new part/device.
Enter this information and other documentation on the part's 'Main Page' section of the Registry
Part Number(s): , , , , , , ,

Gold Medal Requirements

Help another iGEM team by characterizing their DszA biobrick part.
Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project: A Guide to Patents for iGEM - Ownership, Sharing and Innovation.
Eligibility for Special Prizes

Best Human Practice Advance:
We designed and administered an intellectual property survey to gather high impact data from more than 380 members of the iGEM community. The information was useful to other iGEMers, such as Team INSA Lyon who cited the majority of our data for their human practice. Our team also engaged people outside of the iGEM community, such as a patent agent, patent lawyer, University of British Columbia University-Industry Liaison Office and technical experts. The end result, with use of feedback from experts and other iGEM teams, was an intellectual property guide geared specifically towards the iGEM competition. Human Practices #2 (Desulfurization): To gain industrial insight, we went to the Chevron refinery in Burnaby, British Columbia, and talked to an industry professional about the processes pertinent to our project. It demonstrates strides that we have taken towards making our project relevant to real world problems by assessing how our project is applicable to the industrial scen Best Model:


Best Foundational Advance:


Team Accomplishments






Inter-Team Collaborations

Calgary
TU Munich:
We participated in TU Munich's survey on the improvement of part descriptions.

This team completed TU Munich's survey on Standardization of BioBrick part descriptions

INSA Lyon:
INSA Lyon cited our Intellectual Property survey results and provided feedback on our patent guide.