Team:Amsterdam/practices/conclusion

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{Team:Amsterdam/stylesheet}} {{Team:Amsterdam/scripts}} {{Team:Amsterdam/Header}} {{Team:Amsterdam/Sidebar1}} <div id="content-area"> <div id="sub-menu" class="content-block"> ...")
Line 7: Line 7:
<div id="sub-menu" class="content-block">
<div id="sub-menu" class="content-block">
<h1>Human Practices: Conclusion</h1>
<h1>Human Practices: Conclusion</h1>
-
<h4>Main conclusion</h4>
 
-
What did this approach to human practice add to the development of our project?
 
-
Important note: the developmental phase of our project is not finished. We will continue this way, by involving social and natural scientist, if we get the chance (to go to Boston..)
+
<h4>What did our Interactive iGEM research approach add to the development of the Cellular Logbook?</h4>
-
1.By applying this approach we forced ourselves to be open minded. We learned to think about different issues from different perspectives.
+
* By applying this approach we learned to think about different issues concerning our project from different perspectives.
-
2.Concerning our project: we developed an idea into a complex molecular mechanism with the help from useful feedback from other scientist. We showed that the proof of concept worked. We started to think about possible applications of our project and went to talk to different stakeholders in these potential fields.
+
* We developed the idea of a memory system in bacteria into a complex molecular design build on feedback from experts in biotechnology.
 +
 
 +
* Inspired by our talk with an innovation manager we further investigated possible applications for the Cellular Logbook.
 +
 
 +
* Discussions with stakeholders in potential fields guided our project toward its most relevant innovations within the field of biosensors.
 +
 
 +
* An interview with a National Safety Officer learned us about the potential harm of PHGPs. This gave us the opportunity to think about a relevant risk assessment early in the developmental process of the Cellular Logbook. (link to 2nd question in safety)
 +
 
 +
* This (link to discovery facebook?) is what we have achieved in terms of public perception of SB, by engaging in a dialogue during Discovery Festival.
 +
 
 +
<h4>Note of attention</h4>
 +
 
 +
* The developmental phase of the Cellular Logbook is of course far from finished. We will continue to reflect on our actions and to engage possible stakeholders in further developing our product. The context of the project is always changing and we will attempt to be responsive and shape our technology in the right way. In other words: we are relishing the opportunity to make new steps in the interactive development of the Cellular Logbook! There is only one way that can make this happen: by making it to Boston!
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
{{Team:Amsterdam/Foot}}
{{Team:Amsterdam/Foot}}

Revision as of 00:50, 27 September 2012

Human Practices: Conclusion

What did our Interactive iGEM research approach add to the development of the Cellular Logbook?

  • By applying this approach we learned to think about different issues concerning our project from different perspectives.
  • We developed the idea of a memory system in bacteria into a complex molecular design build on feedback from experts in biotechnology.
  • Inspired by our talk with an innovation manager we further investigated possible applications for the Cellular Logbook.
  • Discussions with stakeholders in potential fields guided our project toward its most relevant innovations within the field of biosensors.
  • An interview with a National Safety Officer learned us about the potential harm of PHGPs. This gave us the opportunity to think about a relevant risk assessment early in the developmental process of the Cellular Logbook. (link to 2nd question in safety)
  • This (link to discovery facebook?) is what we have achieved in terms of public perception of SB, by engaging in a dialogue during Discovery Festival.

Note of attention

  • The developmental phase of the Cellular Logbook is of course far from finished. We will continue to reflect on our actions and to engage possible stakeholders in further developing our product. The context of the project is always changing and we will attempt to be responsive and shape our technology in the right way. In other words: we are relishing the opportunity to make new steps in the interactive development of the Cellular Logbook! There is only one way that can make this happen: by making it to Boston!

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam/practices/conclusion"