Team:Chalmers-Gothenburg/Results

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 21:58, 24 September 2012 by Engeler (Talk | contribs)

Sponsors


Microsynth


GATC Biotech


Chalmers


Mölnlycke Health Care

Contents

Results Summary

Survival of yeast in urine

Figure 1: Growth curve for cells in urine and YPD medium. The OD remains the same in the urine i.e. the cells are not growing.

An initial test was performed in order to test the survival of yeast cells in urine, which is an important property of our biosensor if it should function as a pregnancy test kit. Pre-cultures of the lab yeast strain CEN.PK 113-11C were prepared in 5 ml YPD and grown O/N at 30 °C. The day after, the cells were centrifuged, resuspended in 40 ml YPD and 40 ml filter sterilized urine respectively and grown in shake flasks at 30°C. OD600 measurements were taken at two different points of time during the day. The growth curve can be seen in Figure 1. The cells in urine did not grow; the OD remained the same during the whole day, while the cells in YPD were proliferating.

Figure 2: Spot test analysis of cells grown in YPD and urine for 4h. The cells survive in the urine and grow normal after being plated on a YPD plate.

In order to test if the cells remained alive in the urin, 300 µl of each culture (after 4h) were taken and OD600 was adjusted to 0.5. The samples were diluted 3x, 9x, 27x and 81x and 10 µl aliquots of each dilution were spotted on an YPD plate (Figure 2). The cells from both the YPD and the urine media could grow, this means that the cells survived 4 h in urine and grew normal after being spotted on a YPD plate. Summarizing, yeast cells are unable to proliferate in the urine medium but do survive under these conditions.

Deletion of CWP2 gene

Gene Deletion

One task of our iGEM project was the deletion of the CWP2 gene, which is encoding a cell wall mannoprotein. By removing it, we aimed for higher cell wall permeability and thus enhanced chances of our ligand hCG to pass the cell wall and to bind to the membrane-bound receptor. The gene deletion was performed according to the bipartite method. The results from the first PCR reactions, in which we amplified the overlapping fragments, can be seen in Figure 3.

Figure 3: A) A schematic illustration of the first four PCR reactions. The 5' and 3' end of the kanMX (kanamycin resistance) cassette, flanked to loxP sites and available in vector pUG6h, were amplified by PCR (PCR reaction 1 and 2). In addition, 500 bp of the up- and downstream sequence of the CWP2 gene were amplified from genomic DNA using primers with 5' extensions that are complementary to the loxP sites as indicated with lines above. B) The results of the four PCR reactions on gel. The expected sizes of the kanMX and CWP2 fragments are about 1000 bp and 500 bp respectively which correspond to the sizes observed on gel.

The next step was to fuse together the overlapping fragments. The results of the fusion PCR are shown in the Figure 4. By transforming yeast with these fragments, homologous recombination should occur which will lead to the exchange of the CWP2 gene with the kanMX cassette.

Figure 4: A) A schematic illustration of the fusion PCR, the second step in the bipartite method. The CWP2 upstream fragment was fused with the 5’ end of the kanMX cassette and the CWP2 downstream fragment was fused with the 3’ end of the kanMX cassette. B) The results of the fusion PCR on gel. Two samples (A and B) of each PCR reaction are shown. The expected size of both fusion fragments is about 1500 bp which corresponds to the sizes observed on gel (indicated with an arrow).

Colony PCR

Yeast strain IMFD-73 was transformed with 150 ng of each fragment and grown on G418 plates. Colonies could be observed, which were purified, and colony PCR was then performed in order to test whether the kanMX cassette was integrated randomly in the genome or had replaced the CWP2 gene as desired. PCR was run with a forward primer outside of the inserted region and reverse primers within the CWP2 gene or kanMX cassette respectively. As a control, a wild-type strain and a Δcwp2 strain from a deletion library were also tested. The results of the PCR reactions indicated that the deletion was correct (see Figure 5).

Figure 5: A) Schematic illustration of the colony PCR. A forward primer was designed to bind upstream in the genomic DNA of the 500 bp region that had been used in the construction of the bipartite fragment. Two reverse primers were designed to hybridize within the CWP2 gene and in the kanMX cassette respectively. The primers are indicated with arrows. B) The results of the PCR reactions on gel. In every reaction, the cwp2-fw primer but different reverse primers were used. 1: The Δcwp2 deletion strain (bipartite) with the kanMX-rev primer. 2: The Δcwp2 deletion strain (from deletion library) with the kanMX-rev primer. 3: The Δcwp2 deletion strain (bipartite) with the cwp2-rev primer. 4: The Δcwp2 deletion strain (from deletion library) with the cwp2-rev primer. 5. A wild type yeast strain with the cwp2-rev primer. Since the CWP2 gene is missing and the kanMX cassette is inserted instead, bands are expected when PCR is run with the kanMX-rev primer (1, 2, expected size 1800 bp) but no bands should be observed when PCR is performed with the cwp2-rev primer (3, 4). On the contrary, a clear band of about 800 bp should be observed when running PCR with the wild type strain and the cwp2-rev primer. This corresponds to the result on gel which indicates that the CWP2 deletion was successful.

Lyticase assay

A lyticase assay was performed primarily in order to check the activity of lyticase. Another goal was to compare the rapidity of the cell wall degradation between the IMFD-73 and the [IMFD-73 Δcwp2::kanMX] strain. Lyticase was added to the cells and the cell wall degradation (i.e. protoplast formation) could be displayed by adding SDS and then measuring OD at 600 nm (SDS leads to lysis of protoplasts, while cells with intact cell wall remain unaffected). SDS was added and OD values were taken at different time points. The two graphs (Figure 6 and 7) below show the decrease of the amount of intact cells in % over a time period of 1h with two different amounts of lyticase. The percentages of intact cells were calculated as OD600(t=x)/OD600(t=0)*100. One can observe that a slightly smaller amount of cells of the deletion strain were intact between 30 and 60 minutes (except for one outlier at 50 min) which means that the cell wall degraded quicker in the [IMFD-73 Δcwp2::kanMX] strain. This lead to the conclusion that the cell wall is somewhat weakened in the strains with the deleted cell wall mannoprotein gene CWP2.

Figure 4: Assessment of cell wall degradation by lyticase (50 µl enzyme solution). Prior to the each OD measurement, SDS was added. The percentage of intact cells was calculated as OD600(t=x)/OD600(t=0)*100.
Figure 5: Assessment of cell wall degradation by lyticase (20 µl enzyme solution). Prior to the each OD measurement, SDS was added. The percentage of intact cells was calculated as OD600(t=x)/OD600(t=0)*100.

Expression of human LH/CG receptor

Introduction of indigo synthesizing genes