"

From 2012.igem.org

	Home	Team	Official Team Profile	Project	Registered Parts	Modeling	Notebook	Safety	Attributions

Use this page to answer the questions on the safety page.

Contents 1 Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues? 2 Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues? 3 Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? 4 Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues?

During our work at the laboratory in the rooms of the microbial practises we work with these two organisms: Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker Yeast), stem: CEN-PK-2 and Escherichia coli, stem DH5 alpha. Both stems are common safety stems for laboratory work. Nevertheless all living material and material derived from living organism is treated as potentially infectious material. No cell containing material is released into the environment without sterilisation in an autoclave. Before leaving the laboratory, hands and eventually contaminated parts of the body are washed carefully and are disinfected with sterilium.

We work with two hazardous chemicals. One is ethidiumbromide, the other one is ergosterol. We use ethidiumbromide as a depleted solution for staining gels. The manufacturing and disposition of the ethidiumbromide solution is only done by experienced university staff members. When working with the ethidiumbromide bath, gloves (nitrile) have to be used. Such work is only done in special areas which are marked as contaminated. Ergosterol is only treated with gloves below the extractor hood.

Work in the lab is only permitted for students wearing a lab coat, long trousers and closed shoes. For certain kinds of work with increased safety danger safety glasses and appropiate protection gloves have to be used. To eat and drink is of course strictly forbidden.

All of the biobricks we are going to produce are non hazardous as non of them produces toxic gene products. The parts are ether promotor or terminator sequences native to the baker yeast organism, native gens occurring in yeast and one gen from the archae bacterium Sulfolobus acileratius, which produces a gen product already present in yeast. The biobricks belonging to the Steviolglycoside pathwy only produce substances which naturally occur in Stevia, which is an edible plant.

The risk to the public and to the environment is also low. The access to biological and chemical material is restricted to a known group of people. The used Organisms as well as the modified ones are not expected to propagate outside of laboratory conditions.

Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?

As already stated all all of the genetic material is known from edible organisms or only posses gen products known from edible organisms. There is no expectable safety problem with these gen materials.

Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

The project was presented to the safety delegate of the laboratory we work with. Entering the lab is only allowed for students who were instructed by a qualified S1 safety instructor within a year. Methods and equipment which contain extraordinary risks are not used.

Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

For participations in future competitions we are planning to do "Lab dry-runs" were on the one hand the usage of technical equipment can be practised, on the other hand particular danger factors and common mistakes of important instruments and methods can be discussed. We especially intent to reduce the maloperation of instruments and methods for both reduction of material damage and dangerous situations for the students.