Team:University College London/LabBook/Week7
From 2012.igem.org
Contents |
Monday 23.7.12
Aim - Transformation of TetR BBa_C0040 BioBrick
(LOGO) Transformation Protocol 1
Step 1 – Thawing Cells: Use W3100 cell line created in Week 2 (Expt 2.1)
Step 3 – Addition of BioBrick: To a 2ml eppendorf, add 1ul of the following BioBricks. Note: we have changed the protocol for our positive control. Previously it contained no BioBrick, but it has been recommended to us that we transform our positive control such that there is one for each BioBrick – this will tell us if the BioBrick has in any way affected cell viability. This will be used from this point onwards. Include an extra tube as a negative control, with no BioBrick added
Samples | Function | Module | |
---|---|---|---|
BioBrick | BBa_C0040 | Tetracycline Repressor | Buoyancy |
Control | Positive (Contains BioBrick BBa_C0040) | ||
Negative (No Biobrick) |
Step 9 - Plating samples on Agar Plates: The table below indicates the chosen inoculation volume (two for each BioBrick) and the correct gel antibiotic concentration for all samples.
Samples | Volume Inoculated | Antibiotic in Gel (ug/ml) | |
---|---|---|---|
BioBrick | BBa_C0040 | 10ul | Ampicillin(50ug/ml) |
90ul | |||
Control | Positive (Contains BioBrick BBa_C0040) | 36ul | No Antibiotic |
Negative (No BioBrick) | 36ul | 2x Ampicillin(50ug/ml) |
Tuesday 24.7.12
Aim - Results of Transformation
Result: The table below indicates that there was growth for this transformation.
Samples | Volume Inoculated | Colony Formation | |
---|---|---|---|
BioBrick | BBa_C0040 | 10ul | Yes |
90ul | Yes | ||
Control | Positive (Contains BioBrick BBa_C0040) | 36ul | Yes |
Negative (No BioBrick) | 36ul | No |
Monday 23.7.12
Aim - Repeat Restriction Digest for BioBricks in Expt 4.1 and 5.1, where the gel previously was inconclusive: This is intended to diagnose whether the correct plasmid had been transformed into our bacteria, by measuring the size of the digested products against a DNA ladder. In previous gel attempts, K540000 has produced a band of the correct size, but we are repeating it because of the presence of other unexpected bands, which we expect are contaminants from the reaction. A previous restriction digest of BBa_I13522 has failed to produce a band of the correct size, so we are repeating the digest before considering another transformation. For the same reason, we are repeating the digest of BBaK398108, which produced bands of incorrect size, which is suggestive of contamination.
(LOGO) Restriction Digest
Step 2: Set up as follows
Samples | Recipe | Enzymes | |
---|---|---|---|
BioBricks | BBa_ K540000 (Expt 4.1) | Digested | Xbar 1 & Spe1 |
BBa_ I13522 (Expt 4.1) | Digested | Xbar 1 & Spe1 | |
BBa_ K398108 (Expt 5.1) | Digested | Xbar 1 & Spe1 | |
BBa_ KI32003 (Expt 5.1) | Digested | Xbar 1 & Spe1 |
(LOGO) Gel Electrophoresis
Results: The image below shows a 1% Agarose Gel of an Analytical Restriction Enzyme Digest for Expt 7.2. Visible in Lane 1 is a product of the correct size for the BBa_K540000 insert (3123bp), as indicated by A. Also shown is a correct sized product for the backbone PSB1C3 (2070bp), as indicated by B. Lane 2 shows a product corresponding to the size of the BBa_I13522 insert (937bp) as indicated by C. Also present is a product corresponding to the size of the PSB1A3 backbone (2155bp) as indicated by D. Lane 3 has a product corresponding to the expected size of insert BBa_K398108 (844bp) as indicated by E, and a product of the expected size for the plasmid backbone PSB1C3 (2070bp) as indicated by F. Lane 4 shows no products, where we would expect a product of size 1849bp (indicated by G) and a product of 2155 (indicated by H).
(Insert Picture 1)
Conclusion: Plasmids Bba_k540000 (3123), Bba_I13522 (937) and Bba_K391108 (844) have produced bands of the correct size. The band at 2000 is the plasmid backbone. The failure of Bba_K123003 to produce a band is not of great concern, as we do not expect we will require this BioBrick. However, we may repeat it at a later date.
Tuesday 24.7.12
Aim - Colony Picking from unsuccessful colonies for Expt 7.1 and 6.3
(LOGO) Picking Colonies
Step 2 – Inoculating Colonies into a Selective Broth: The table below indicates the volume of broth and the concentration of antibiotic required for each BioBrick.
Samples | Number of Falcons | Broth | Antibiotic | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Biobrick | BBa_C0040 | 3 | Lysogeny Broth (5ml) | Ampicillin(50ug/ml) |
BBa_I750016 | 4 | |||
BBa_B0034 | 5 | |||
BBa_B0015 | 3 | |||
BBa_J23119 | 2 |
Wednesday 23.7.12
Aim - Results from Colony Picking
Results:
Samples | Number of Falcons | Growth | |
---|---|---|---|
BioBrick | BBa_C0040 | 3 | None |
BBa_I750016 | 4 | None | |
BBa_B0034 | 5 | Growth in one | |
BBa_B0015 | 3 | Growth | |
BBa_J23119 | 2 | Growth |
Conclusion: We are beginning to consider other possibilities for the failure of Colony Picking in Expt 7.1 and Expt 6.3. Foremost, we believe it may be due to the addition of Ampicillin to the Agar before it has cooled sufficiently, leading to degradation of the antibiotic. This would reduce the selective pressure, and allow growth of colonies that are not Ampicillin-resistant. Subsequent inoculation into Amipicillin positive LB brother leads to failed growth. Those BioBricks that have worked will undergo Miniprep, Restriction Enzyme Digests and Nanodrop.
Method Miniprep: (LOGO) Miniprep Protocol 1 (Qiagen)
Step 1: Set up an eppendorf as follows
Step ?: Used 2mls Step ?: Step ? had to be missed because we realised too late we had too little PE? buffer remaining.
Restriction Digest: (LOGO) Restriction Digest Protocol 1
Step 2 - Setting up Digests and Controls: The protocol describes the recipe for (i) Digested Plasmid and (ii) Uncut Control. The table below indicates that an uncut and an Xcar1/Spe1 digested sample be set up for each BioBrick. et up Eppendorfs as follows
Week 7