Team:NYU Gallatin/Project/Socializing
From 2012.igem.org
NYU Gallatin 2012 iGEM Team
Main menu
- HomeHome of Aseatobacter.Home
- TeamThe brains of the operation.Team
- ProjectLearn more about our project.Project
- PartsOur work with the parts registry.Parts
- ModelingHow we put it all together.Modeling
- NotebookLab notebooks, news, and photos.Notebook
- SafetyOur commitment to safety.Safety
- AttributionsGive credit where credit is due.Attributions
- ProfileOfficial iGEM 2012 profile.Profile
The Project
Our Human Practices
What We Did
The biological portion of our project altered the cellulose produced by acetobacter xylinum for use as a fabrication material in consumer products. Accordingly, the human practices portion of our project focused on the consumer market for genetically modified (GM) products and sought to identify the primary demographic and psychographic predictors of approval for those products. We used both quantitative and qualitative measures to research this question.
The quantitative measure was in the form of a ten item survey administered to a national sample via the world wide web. The survey asked respondents whether they were aware that GM food and cotton were already sold in stores, whether they approved of GM food, clothes, fuels, and medicine, how safe they perceived GM products to be, and basic demographic information including their age, gender, and highest level of education completed. A 37 percent response rate yielded 168 usable responses, and results are reported with 95 percent confidence and a confidence interval of 7.5 percent. We found that product type, gender, and awareness of existing GM products were all predictors of approval for GM products. We also found that women were significantly less likely to approve of GM products (p
As a qualitative measure of opinion concerning GM products, we created an artificial store selling GM products at a widely attended street festival in Brooklyn, NY and interviewed visitors concerning their perceptions of actual and hypothetical GM products on display at the store. We interviewed women in particular and found that the perception of GM products as unsafe or untrustworthy is a likely cause of disapproval for GM products.
The Survey
Our human practices portion consists of a study concerning relationships among awareness, education, and approval of different genetically modified products. e.g. Do people care whether cotton is genetically engineered as much as food? The survey results were collected online as well as our shoppe at Atlantic Antic from volunteers off the street.
Methodology
- 10 item web survey regarding genetically modified (GM) products:
- Awareness that GM food and cotton are sold (2 items).
- Approval for GM food, clothes, fuel and medicine (4 items).
- Perceived safety of GM products (1 item).
- Age, gender and education (3 items).
- Respondents were recruited by a survey research firm using email and online advertising, and through social networks.
- Most respondents received $0.50 to a charity or the chance to win $100 in an online sweepstakes.
- Survey administered the week of 9/21/12.
Sample Overview
- National sample, including more than 50 U.S. metro areas.
- 37 percent response rate, 168 usable responses.
Summary
- Product type, gender, awareness all affect approval for GM products.
- Increasing GM awareness primarily influences undecideds.
- Age and education showed no significant effect.
- Results are 95 percent confidence +/- 7.5 percent.
- Further research needed to examine the mechanism affecting approval. We believe perceived risk versus reward and emotions of disgust and fear are likely drivers.