Team:USP-UNESP-Brazil/Associative Memory/Background
From 2012.igem.org
Network
Hopfield Associative Memory Networks
The idea of this project is based on the associative memory network introduced by J.J. Hopfield in the 80’s [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopfield_network]. The structure of a Hopfield network is simple, all neurons are interconnected, what brings some interesting memory properties and provide a model for understanding human memory.
We have chosen to built a Hopfield network because of its simplicity and robustness. The same methodology can be used to the construction of networks with different architectures, such as the called “perceptrons” [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron]. In contrast to a Hopfield network, a perceptron is commonly used as a classifier and its structure is feed-forward.
Biological Mechanism
In a biological neural network, the cells occupy a specific location and the information is addressed through a direct physical contact - the neuron axonal projections. In our case, a population of bacteria represents a single neuron and the information is addressed by a quorum sensing molecule (QSM). With different QSM, it is possible to address the information in a specific manner. A comparison between a biological neural network and our design is presented in Fig 1.
To measure if one population is active, we have planned the construction of a device that keeps each population of bacteria in a fixed position and enable the communication between different populations via QSM, figure 2. The device can be constructed using a plate of 96 wells with membranes attached to the bottom. The membranes allow the diffusion of the quorum sensing substances but prevent the flux of bacterial populations.
Genetic Construction
Despite the solution we found to the specificity of the communication, another problem appears when we try to genetically build the bacterial populations: there are not enough quorum sensing molecules to create 9 bacterial populations. So, as a proof of concept and for simplicity, we designed two populations of bacteria that intercommunicate in a repressive manner. Because of this limitation we have chosen the patterns "X" and "O" in our 9 wells device, figure 3. In this case each position of the letter “X” inhibits all positions of “O” and activates the positions of its own pattern (and vice-versa). Because of this simmetry of the positions, only two different population of bacteria are need, one for the the positions that form the "X" and other to the "O".
We decided to use two of the four quorum sensing systems available in the registry of parts [http://partsregistry.org/Main_Page], the Cin and Rhl.
To convert the signals in activation or inhibition, we created a system of transduction of the quorum sensing signal to transcription of an activator or an inhibitor of the transcription of GFP, this will be our system activation reporter. Simultaneous inhibitions and activations of a bacterial population will be converted to a molecular competition of activators and inhibitors by the promoter that controls the production of GFP. It is this molecular competition that promotes the decision between the memories of the communication systems, associating a given input with a more similar memory. As an example, if an input activates more positions of the “X” pattern than the “O”, the competition in the pattern “X” positions will be more favorable to its activation due to the greater number of activators produced by the activated positions, while in the positions of the “O” pattern the opposite occurs, because of its small number of positions activated initially by the given input.
The promoter multi-regulated by an activator and an inhibitor is called Prm. Its inhibitor is the transcriptional factor cl434 and its activator is the cl factor. The genetic design of the positions of the patterns “X” and “O” can be seen in Figure 6.
The construction using the signal transduction containing cl434 and cl allows creating different systems of associative memory, limited only by the quantity of quorum sensingsystems available. Figure 6 shows how this generic system would work and elucidates how this system could be applied to different functions involving a genetic control.