Team:WashU/Safety

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 20:06, 5 June 2012

1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:

a. Researcher Safety?

The WashU team is working primarily with very common, safe chemicals. The researchers have also been trained in proper handling of chemicals for some hazardous chemicals such as Ethidium Bromide. For each hazardous chemical, we have read and follow safety protocols to protect the researcher. For all chemicals nitrile gloves, lab coats, and safety goggles are used. Additionally, all work with volatile chemicals is carried out in a fume hood.

b. Public Safety?

All researchers in the WashU team have been trained in applicable lab safety and sterile techniques to insure that no one inadvertently release bacteria into the environment to insure public safety. In any case all bacteria are maintained in cell cultures. The products we extracted from the bacteria, safranal and crocin, are safe to work with.

c. Environmental Safety?

All harmful chemicals that we work with are disposed of in compliance with local and federal Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) standards. The EHS disposes of these harmful chemicals in a way that is least deleterious to the environment.

2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?

None of our new BioBrick parts raise any significant safety issues given that they are genes found commonly in the C. sativus and Arabidopsis thaliana. None of the new BioBrick parts should provide any advantages in transformed bacteria as compared with wild type bacteria. Therefore these parts should be very safe to use and manipulate.

3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

a. If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?

The local EHS division is active on the Washington University campus. The entire team completed an EHS training course to encourage lab safety. Our project was approved by the biology department which is held accountable directly to the EHS representative.

4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

Currently all team members are required to complete EHS training as part of the Washington University requirements to work in a lab. Every team in the iGEM competition should complete EHS and basic lab safety training as a part of the requirements to compete. International teams should be required to complete their version of lab safety training. This would encourage safer practices which will set good habits for the future of bioengineering.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 .	Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
-	Researcher Safety?
-	The WashU team is working primarily with very common, safe chemicals. The researchers have also been trained in proper handling of chemicals for some hazardous chemicals such as Ethidium Bromide. For each hazardous chemical, we have read and follow safety protocols to protect the researcher. For all chemicals nitrile gloves, lab coats, and safety goggles are used. Additionally, all work with volatile chemicals is carried out in a fume hood.
+	a. Researcher Safety?
-	Public Safety?
-	All researchers in the WashU team have been trained in applicable lab safety and sterile techniques to insure that no one inadvertently release bacteria into the environment to insure public safety. In any case all bacteria are maintained in cell cultures. The products we extracted from the bacteria, safranal and crocin, are safe to work with.
+The WashU team is working primarily with very common, safe chemicals. The researchers have also been trained in proper handling of chemicals for some hazardous chemicals such as Ethidium Bromide. For each hazardous chemical, we have read and follow safety protocols to protect the researcher. For all chemicals nitrile gloves, lab coats, and safety goggles are used. Additionally, all work with volatile chemicals is carried out in a fume hood.
-	Environmental Safety?
-	All harmful chemicals that we work with are disposed of in compliance with local and federal Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) standards. The EHS disposes of these harmful chemicals in a way that is least deleterious to the environment.
+	b. Public Safety?
+All researchers in the WashU team have been trained in applicable lab safety and sterile techniques to insure that no one inadvertently release bacteria into the environment to insure public safety. In any case all bacteria are maintained in cell cultures. The products we extracted from the bacteria, safranal and crocin, are safe to work with.
+	c. Environmental Safety?
+All harmful chemicals that we work with are disposed of in compliance with local and federal Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) standards. The EHS disposes of these harmful chemicals in a way that is least deleterious to the environment.
 .	Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?
-	None of our new BioBrick parts raise any significant safety issues given that they are genes found commonly in the C. sativus and Arabidopsis thaliana. None of the new BioBrick parts should provide any advantages in transformed bacteria as compared with wild type bacteria. Therefore these parts should be very safe to use and manipulate.
+None of our new BioBrick parts raise any significant safety issues given that they are genes found commonly in the C. sativus and Arabidopsis thaliana. None of the new BioBrick parts should provide any advantages in transformed bacteria as compared with wild type bacteria. Therefore these parts should be very safe to use and manipulate.
 .	Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
-	If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
-	The local EHS division is active on the Washington University campus. The entire team completed an EHS training course to encourage lab safety. Our project was approved by the biology department which is held accountable directly to the EHS representative.
+	a. If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?
+The local EHS division is active on the Washington University campus. The entire team completed an EHS training course to encourage lab safety. Our project was approved by the biology department which is held accountable directly to the EHS representative.
 .	Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?
-	Currently all team members are required to complete EHS training as part of the Washington University requirements to work in a lab. Every team in the iGEM competition should complete EHS and basic lab safety training as a part of the requirements to compete. International teams should be required to complete their version of lab safety training. This would encourage safer practices which will set good habits for the future of bioengineering.
+	Currently all team members are required to complete EHS training as part of the Washington University requirements to work in a lab. Every team in the iGEM competition should complete EHS and basic lab safety training as a part of the requirements to compete. International teams should be required to complete their version of lab safety training. This would encourage safer practices which will set good habits for the future of bioengineering.