"

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 11:48, 23 August 2012 (view source) Gcn10tdu (Talk | contribs) (→Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:) ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:55, 23 August 2012 (view source) Gcn10tdu (Talk | contribs) (→researcher safety) Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=researcher safety=		=researcher safety=
-		+	The university has safety standards which have to be met, which included having  basic safety training before starting wet lab work, as well as reading and signing COSH forms. Within this training we learnt what to do in emergencies, where we could access the safety booklet which is always within the lab, as well as being shown where to dispose of the different chemicals and used equipment. It is also vital that researchers within the university where PPE, including lab coat, gloves and covered shoes.
	=public safety=		=public safety=

---

Revision as of 11:55, 23 August 2012

Use this page to answer the questions on the safety page.

Contents 1 Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: 2 researcher safety 3 public safety 4 environmental safety 4.1 Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes, 4.2 Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? 4.3 Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:

When designing the experiments the NRPUEA team would undertake we had to consider not only the safety of the researchers and others within the lab, but also the public and the environment.We had to consider carefully the organisms and chemicals we would be using within lab, how we would handle these safely and then dispose of them after to minimize effect on environment and public.

researcher safety

The university has safety standards which have to be met, which included having basic safety training before starting wet lab work, as well as reading and signing COSH forms. Within this training we learnt what to do in emergencies, where we could access the safety booklet which is always within the lab, as well as being shown where to dispose of the different chemicals and used equipment. It is also vital that researchers within the university where PPE, including lab coat, gloves and covered shoes.

public safety

environmental safety

Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? If yes,

did you document these issues in the Registry? how did you manage to handle the safety issue? How could other teams learn from your experience?

Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project? If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?

Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?