Team:MIT/Motivation
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
</br>A traditional NOT gate is ~1000 bp, whereas our strand displacement NOT gate is ~100 bp. | </br>A traditional NOT gate is ~1000 bp, whereas our strand displacement NOT gate is ~100 bp. | ||
<li><b>Simple combinatorial design space</b> | <li><b>Simple combinatorial design space</b> | ||
- | </br>With 4 | + | </br>With 4 nucleotides, we can create a nearly infinite number of orthogonal sequences leading to orthogonal parts. |
<li><b>Ease of composition</b> | <li><b>Ease of composition</b> | ||
</br>The input motif matches the output motif allowing for modular cascading reactions. | </br>The input motif matches the output motif allowing for modular cascading reactions. |
Revision as of 02:41, 27 October 2012
Background and Motivation
In the near future, biological circuits will be much more modular and sophisticated than they are now, with a ten-fold smaller nucleotide footprint.
The Enabling Technology: Toehold-Mediated Strand Displacement
Background
Qian and Winfree (Science 2011) utilized DNA computation to create AND and OR logic gates in vitro. They constructed a sophisticated binary square root circuit using these gates:Motivation for Bringing Strand Displacement to Mammalian Synthetic Biology
- More sophisticated circuits with smaller nucleotide footprint A traditional NOT gate is ~1000 bp, whereas our strand displacement NOT gate is ~100 bp.
- Simple combinatorial design space With 4 nucleotides, we can create a nearly infinite number of orthogonal sequences leading to orthogonal parts.
- Ease of composition The input motif matches the output motif allowing for modular cascading reactions.
- Tunability We can set arbitrary digital signal thresholds by varying the concentration of circuit species. We can also achieve signal amplification by including a fuel molecule.