Team:University College London/Research/MarineBacteria
From 2012.igem.org
(→Growth comparison) |
(→Growth comparison) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
[[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_1.png]] | [[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_1.png]] | ||
+ | |||
[[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_2.png]] | [[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_2.png]] | ||
+ | |||
[[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_3.png]] | [[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_3.png]] | ||
+ | |||
[[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_4.png]] | [[File:UniversityCollegeLondon_Marine_4.png]] |
Revision as of 02:28, 27 September 2012
Contents |
Marine Chassis
Roseobacter clade bacteria - novel chassis for synthetic biology
In consultation with Paola R. Gomez-Pereira of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, we identified Oceanibulbus indoliflex and Roseobacter dentitrificans as promising chassis for the expression of our system.
The roseobacter clade bacteria, RCB, constitute a significant proportion of coastal and mixed layer ocean bacterioplankton communities, upwards of 15 and 20% respectively, and are found in a diverse range of marine habitats. RCB demonstrate numerous traits, including aerobic anoxygenic phototrophy, aromatic compound degradation and recycling of sulphur within the water column and have been implicated in carbon monoxide consumption. (Wagner-Döbler & Biebl, et al. 2006). Significantly, in the context of plastic Island, they are shown to be major colonisers of submerged surfaces in marine waters (Dang & Lovell et al. 2002).
Colony Morphology
Oceanibulbus indoliflexon marine agar.
Transformation Protocols
Transformation of Oceanibulbus indoliflex by electroporation.
Electrocompetent cells were prepared according to the following protocol:
45mL Marine Broth was inoculated with 2ml of an overnight culture of OI (in 5ml Marine broth) and grown to approx 0.5 Absorbance at OD 578.
10mL volumes were transferred to 50 mL falcons and cells were sedimented for 15mins at 3200 x g in a pre-chilled centrifuge.
Cells were washed 5 times with 10% (v/v) glycerol, and finally resuspended in 400uL 10% (v/v) glycerol.
50uL aliquots were made and stored at -80C.
1uL DNA was added to 50uL competent cells to chilled 1mm electrocuvettes, and treated with a field strength of 2.5kV.
1ml marine broth was added to cells and mixtures were transferred to falcons for incubation overnight at room temperature at 200rpm and finally plated on marine agar supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. Incubated at 30˚C for 2 days.
Growth comparison
Growth comparison of Oceanibulbus indoliflex and Escherichia coli in marine and luria broth. We sought to compare the growth profiles of O. indoliflex and E. coli.
References
1. Brinkhoff, T., Giebel, H.-A., & Simon, M. (2008). Diversity, ecology, and genomics of the Roseobacter clade: a short overview. Archives of microbiology, 189(6), 531–9.
2. Piekarski, T., Buchholz, I., Drepper, T., Schobert, M., Wagner-Doebler, I., Tielen, P., & Jahn, D. (2009). Genetic tools for the investigation of Roseobacter clade bacteria. BMC microbiology, 9, 265.
3. Buchan, A., González, J. M., & Moran, M. A. (2005). Overview of the marine roseobacter lineage. Applied and environmental microbiology, 71(10), 5665–77.
4. Dang, H., & Lovell, C. R. (2002). Seasonal dynamics of particle-associated and free-living marine Proteobacteria in a salt marsh tidal creek as determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Environmental microbiology, 4(5), 287–95.