"
Team:ZJU-China/model s2 3.htm
From 2012.igem.org
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
<body class="home"> | <body class="home"> | ||
| + | <h2>A large scale simulation</h2> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The initial state is as following:</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">Edge of cube: 50 units</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of A: 2000</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of B: 0</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of C: 0</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of E1: 50</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of E2: 50</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">Scaffold Non-scaffold</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of A: 1417 The number of A: 1470</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of B: 436 The number of B: 451</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of C: 147 The number of C: 79</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of E1: 50 The number of E1: 50</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">The number of E2: 50 The number of E2: 50</p> | ||
| + | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_4.jpg"></div> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">Figure 4. Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.</p> | ||
| + | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_5.jpg"></div> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">Figure 5. Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
| + | <h2>Comparison between scaffold system and non-scaffold system</h2> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).</p> | ||
| + | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_6.jpg"></div> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">Figure 6. The number of B and C as iteration grows.</p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
| + | <p align="justify">From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.</p> | ||
</body></html> | </body></html> | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 26 September 2012
A large scale simulation
The initial state is as following:
Edge of cube: 50 units
The number of A: 2000
The number of B: 0
The number of C: 0
The number of E1: 50
The number of E2: 50
The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units
After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:
Scaffold Non-scaffold
The number of A: 1417 The number of A: 1470
The number of B: 436 The number of B: 451
The number of C: 147 The number of C: 79
The number of E1: 50 The number of E1: 50
The number of E2: 50 The number of E2: 50
Figure 4. Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.
Figure 5. Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.
Comparison between scaffold system and non-scaffold system
As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).
Figure 6. The number of B and C as iteration grows.
From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.
