Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Expression

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Why?)
Line 4: Line 4:
=Why?=
=Why?=
-
From our work on [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Photoactivation|LOV2 photoactivation]] we might be able to predict the percentage of LOV2 domains in our LovTAP-VP16, even though this value might be affected by the fact of having both ends fused to other domains: TrpR and VP16.
+
From our work on [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Photoactivation|LOV2 photoactivation]] we might be able to predict the percentage of LOV2 domains in our LovTAP-VP16, even though this value might be affected by the fact of having both ends fused to other domains: TrpR and VP16. However, some authors, as [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/References#Kasahara_2002|Kasahara et al]], worked with fusion LOV2 proteins, getting comparable parameters.
 +
 
 +
We will then assume that we know the proportion of activated LovTAP-VP16 monomers. But LovTAP-VP16 has to dimerize to be able to bind DNA. In the section [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/
[[File:EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path_simple.png|600px]]
[[File:EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path_simple.png|600px]]

Revision as of 08:49, 26 September 2012

Why?

From our work on LOV2 photoactivation we might be able to predict the percentage of LOV2 domains in our LovTAP-VP16, even though this value might be affected by the fact of having both ends fused to other domains: TrpR and VP16. However, some authors, as Kasahara et al, worked with fusion LOV2 proteins, getting comparable parameters.

We will then assume that we know the proportion of activated LovTAP-VP16 monomers. But LovTAP-VP16 has to dimerize to be able to bind DNA. In the section [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/

EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path simple.png

92% of photoactive LOV2 has it's Jα-helix undocked (Yao et al, 2008).

Eitoku et al (2005) say it takes 2 ms for the J&alpha-helix to undock.