"
Team:Freiburg/HumanPractices/Overview
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Pablinitus (Talk | contribs) (→0. Overview) |
Pablinitus (Talk | contribs) (→0. Overview) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| + | [[File:humansymbol.png|center|180px]] | ||
| - | + | <br><p> | |
| - | <div align="justify">The human practices project of our team did not concentrate on inquiring the ethical, social and legal implications of the synthetic biology, but rather on analysing what the actual sources of these diverse problems are. We believe that this is a necessary step before ethical, social and legal deliberations of synthetic biology can be fruitful; that indeed, at first, we need to examine if these problems are actual problems at all, as oppossed to just taking them as facts, wtihout further consideration. To this avail, we tried to leave aside all ‘small-talk-philosophy’ and futuristic ethical ‘just-so-stories’ in order to conduct a detailed and rigorous philosophical analysis of the epistemology of synthetic biology and the ontology of its products. For this, we combined state-of the-art-approaches of three fields of analytic philosophy (philosophy of technology, philosophy of biology and philosophy of language) to deliver consistent judgements. The results of this philosophical analysis reveal a number of epistemological deficits of the synthetic biology, but also offer the possibility of a consistent epistemological foundation of it.<br><br> | + | <div align="justify">The human practices project of our team did not concentrate on inquiring the ethical, social and legal implications of the synthetic biology, but rather on analysing what the actual sources of these diverse problems are. We believe that this is a necessary step before ethical, social and legal deliberations of synthetic biology can be fruitful; that indeed, at first, we need to examine if these problems are actual problems at all, as oppossed to just taking them as facts, wtihout further consideration. To this avail, we tried to leave aside all ‘small-talk-philosophy’ and futuristic ethical ‘just-so-stories’ in order to conduct a detailed and rigorous philosophical analysis of the epistemology of synthetic biology and the ontology of its products. For this, we combined state-of the-art-approaches of three fields of analytic philosophy (philosophy of technology, philosophy of biology and philosophy of language) to deliver consistent judgements. The results of this philosophical analysis reveal a number of epistemological deficits of the synthetic biology, but also offer the possibility of a consistent epistemological foundation of it.<br><br><br> |
| + | [[File:Threecircles.png|center|380px]] | ||
| + | <br> | ||
In addition to the philosophical analysis we also tried to didactically inform people of different ages about the nascent field of synthetic biology, in order to facilitate the acceptance and to avoid prejudice among the broad public. We worked with small children on extracting DNA from onions, visited high schools, held lectures for undergraduates and opened our doors to visitors and school students. Moreover, we presented our project on a congress in Berlin and gave three interviews in order to reach a broader audience. In summary, we can divide our human practices project in three main categories:</div> | In addition to the philosophical analysis we also tried to didactically inform people of different ages about the nascent field of synthetic biology, in order to facilitate the acceptance and to avoid prejudice among the broad public. We worked with small children on extracting DNA from onions, visited high schools, held lectures for undergraduates and opened our doors to visitors and school students. Moreover, we presented our project on a congress in Berlin and gave three interviews in order to reach a broader audience. In summary, we can divide our human practices project in three main categories:</div> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| + | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 25 September 2012
0. Overview
The human practices project of our team did not concentrate on inquiring the ethical, social and legal implications of the synthetic biology, but rather on analysing what the actual sources of these diverse problems are. We believe that this is a necessary step before ethical, social and legal deliberations of synthetic biology can be fruitful; that indeed, at first, we need to examine if these problems are actual problems at all, as oppossed to just taking them as facts, wtihout further consideration. To this avail, we tried to leave aside all ‘small-talk-philosophy’ and futuristic ethical ‘just-so-stories’ in order to conduct a detailed and rigorous philosophical analysis of the epistemology of synthetic biology and the ontology of its products. For this, we combined state-of the-art-approaches of three fields of analytic philosophy (philosophy of technology, philosophy of biology and philosophy of language) to deliver consistent judgements. The results of this philosophical analysis reveal a number of epistemological deficits of the synthetic biology, but also offer the possibility of a consistent epistemological foundation of it.
1. Philosophical Analysis
2. Educational Outreach
3. Public Outreach
