Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Photoactivation

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Why?)
Line 8: Line 8:
* Will we have to push it up?  
* Will we have to push it up?  
* What lighting pattern will give best results?
* What lighting pattern will give best results?
 +
 +
==What?==
To optimize the number of experiments to perform, we have built a simple model to predict the proportion of photoproduct to be expected at every time point when a sample with LovTAP-VP16 when it's illuminated with a time varying light input.
To optimize the number of experiments to perform, we have built a simple model to predict the proportion of photoproduct to be expected at every time point when a sample with LovTAP-VP16 when it's illuminated with a time varying light input.
 +
 +
==How?==
 +
When light with the appropriate
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/Footer}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/Footer}}

Revision as of 14:05, 23 September 2012

Contents

Introduction

Why?

Hockberger et al (1999) suggest that blue light up to 470 nm can have some phototoxic effect on mammalian cells, from 2 to 6 J/cm². In our experiments, we have observed a much higher cell death rate in the cultures exposed for 24h to blue light than in the control. 24h at 20 mW/m² is actually more than 1700 J/cm². To stay on the safe side, and give the cells 6 J/cm² during 4 hours would mean an average of 0.4 mW/cm².

  • How much activation can we get with this rate?
  • Will we have to push it up?
  • What lighting pattern will give best results?

What?

To optimize the number of experiments to perform, we have built a simple model to predict the proportion of photoproduct to be expected at every time point when a sample with LovTAP-VP16 when it's illuminated with a time varying light input.

How?

When light with the appropriate