Team:WashU/Safety
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
BrianBasco (Talk | contribs) |
BrianBasco (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<li>Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?</li> | <li>Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?</li> | ||
- | None of our new BioBrick parts raise any significant safety issues given that they are genes found commonly in Crocus sativus and Arabidopsis thaliana. None of the new BioBrick parts should provide any advantages in transformed bacteria as compared with wild type bacteria. Therefore these parts should be very safe to use and manipulate. | + | None of our new BioBrick parts raise any significant safety issues given that they are genes found commonly in <i>Crocus sativus</i> and <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>. None of the new BioBrick parts should provide any advantages in transformed bacteria as compared with wild type bacteria. Therefore these parts should be very safe to use and manipulate. |
<li>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</li> | <li>Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</li> |
Revision as of 16:43, 26 July 2012