Team:Uppsala University/Translational
From 2012.igem.org
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<table> | <table> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <b>Conclusion</b> | + | <b>Conclusion</b><br> |
We managed to engineer artificial small RNA (sRNA) inhibiting the translation of the antibiotic resistance gene AAC(6’)Ib-cr isolated from a multiresistant bacterial outbreak in a hospital in Sweden. In the process, we managed to demonstrate a standardized method for construction and screening for sRNA successfully against a target mRNA. In practice, sRNA induced silencing of any gene of interest. <br><br> | We managed to engineer artificial small RNA (sRNA) inhibiting the translation of the antibiotic resistance gene AAC(6’)Ib-cr isolated from a multiresistant bacterial outbreak in a hospital in Sweden. In the process, we managed to demonstrate a standardized method for construction and screening for sRNA successfully against a target mRNA. In practice, sRNA induced silencing of any gene of interest. <br><br> | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<b>Validation of sRNA-mRNA interactions</b><br> | <b>Validation of sRNA-mRNA interactions</b><br> | ||
- | IntaRNA, an RNA-RNA-interaction prediction software adapted for sRNA and ncRNA interactions [1] was used to predict the sRNA-mRNA interactions of the candidate sRNAs against the target mRNA containing the | + | IntaRNA, an RNA-RNA-interaction prediction software adapted for sRNA and ncRNA interactions [1] was used to predict the sRNA-mRNA interactions of the candidate sRNAs against the target mRNA containing the AAC(6’)-5’UTR and the SYFP coding sequence. See <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Uppsala_University/Modelling">modelling page</a> for details. Some of the sRNAs corresponding to the highest SYFP2 downregulation showed a significant basepair matching close to the RBS of the AAC(6’)-5’UTR. A few of the sRNAs was predicted to hybridize in the SYFP2 region of the mRNA.</p><br><br> |
<p style="margin-right:0px;font-size:10px;margin-bottom:10px;float:left;width:300px"> | <p style="margin-right:0px;font-size:10px;margin-bottom:10px;float:left;width:300px"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7f/Etest_assembled_data_graph_260912_medium.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7f/Etest_assembled_data_graph_260912_medium.png" width="300"></a> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7f/Etest_assembled_data_graph_260912_medium.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7f/Etest_assembled_data_graph_260912_medium.png" width="300"></a> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Above: Resistances of strains carrying a minimal F-plasmid containing the whole AAC(6’)Ib-cr gene expressed by it's native promoter, as well as a plasmid constitutively expressing the sRNA. A downregulation from MIC>256µg/ml to MIC=53±9µg/ml was the largest measured. Below: The kanamycin resistance of E coli carrying the clinical resistance plasmid pUUH239.2. | + | Above: Resistances of strains carrying a minimal F-plasmid containing the whole AAC(6’)Ib-cr gene expressed by it's native promoter, as well as a plasmid constitutively expressing the sRNA. A downregulation from MIC>256µg/ml to MIC=53±9µg/ml was the largest measured. Below: The kanamycin resistance of <i>E coli</i> carrying the clinical resistance plasmid pUUH239.2. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<b>Downregulation of antibiotic resistance on a F-plasmid</b><br> | <b>Downregulation of antibiotic resistance on a F-plasmid</b><br> | ||
- | The next step was to test if the isolated sRNA also showed downregulation of the actual antibiotic resistance gene. To do this, we tested four different sRNA clones (UU17, UU37, UU46, UU55) | + | The next step was to test if the isolated sRNA also showed downregulation of the actual antibiotic resistance gene. To do this, we tested four different sRNA clones (UU17, UU37, UU46, UU55) in an <i>E coli</i> strain (MG1655) carrying the the AAC(6’)Ib-cr gene on an F-plasmid. E-tests were performed and the results showed that three of our four clones tested actually downregulates the resistance gene. This supports the hypothesis that it is the actual 5’UTR that is the key to control the the expression of the gene with our sRNAs.</p> |
<p><br> | <p><br> | ||
To better understand the nature of small RNA downregulation and inhibiting translation of our gene of interest, we modeled the interactions between our sRNA and the mRNA. You can read more about this <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Uppsala_University/Modelling">here</a>. | To better understand the nature of small RNA downregulation and inhibiting translation of our gene of interest, we modeled the interactions between our sRNA and the mRNA. You can read more about this <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Uppsala_University/Modelling">here</a>. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <br> | + | <br><br><br> |
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<p><b>Test on clinical plasmid</b><br> | <p><b>Test on clinical plasmid</b><br> | ||
- | After testing our sRNA against the antibiotic resistance gene AAC(6') on a F-plasmid, the next challenge was to test them against a clinical plasmid (pUUH239.2) isolated from the outbreak of | + | After testing our sRNA against the antibiotic resistance gene AAC(6') on a F-plasmid, the next challenge was to test them against a clinical plasmid (pUUH239.2) isolated from the outbreak of multiresistant ESBL <i>E coli</i> bacteria at the Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden. Our best sRNA clone showed a 92 % downregulation of antibiotic resistance. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</tr> | </tr> |
Revision as of 22:01, 26 October 2012
|
|||||
|