Team:ZJU-China/model s2 3.htm
From 2012.igem.org
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
list-style-type: none; | list-style-type: none; | ||
} | } | ||
- | table | + | table,th,td |
{ | { | ||
- | |||
background-color: transparent; | background-color: transparent; | ||
- | + | border:2px solid #634201; | |
- | + | font-size:15px; | |
+ | border-collapse:collapse; | ||
+ | padding: 5px 20px; | ||
} | } | ||
h3 | h3 | ||
Line 230: | Line 231: | ||
<p align="justify">The initial state is as following:</p> | <p align="justify">The initial state is as following:</p> | ||
<p align="justify">Edge of cube: 50 units</p> | <p align="justify">Edge of cube: 50 units</p> | ||
- | <p align="justify">The | + | <p align="justify">The amount of A: 2000</p> |
- | <p align="justify">The | + | <p align="justify">The amount of B: 0</p> |
- | <p align="justify">The | + | <p align="justify">The amount of C: 0</p> |
- | <p align="justify">The | + | <p align="justify">The amount of E1: 50</p> |
- | <p align="justify">The | + | <p align="justify">The amount of E2: 50</p> |
<p align="justify">The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units</p> | <p align="justify">The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units</p> | ||
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
<p align="justify">After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:</p> | <p align="justify">After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:</p> | ||
- | < | + | <table align="center"> |
- | < | + | <tr> |
- | < | + | <th></th> |
- | < | + | <th>Scaffold</th> |
- | < | + | <th>Non-scaffold</th> |
- | < | + | </tr> |
- | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_4.jpg"></div> | + | <tr> |
- | <p align="justify"> | + | <td>A (Substrate)</td> |
- | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_5.jpg"></div> | + | <td>1417</td> |
- | <p align="justify"> | + | <td>1470<td> |
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>B (Intermediate)</td> | ||
+ | <td>436</td> | ||
+ | <td>451</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>C (Product)</td> | ||
+ | <td>147</td> | ||
+ | <td>79</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>E1 (Enzyme1)</td> | ||
+ | <td>50</td> | ||
+ | <td>50</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>E2 (Enzyme2)</td> | ||
+ | <td>50</td> | ||
+ | <td>50</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_4.jpg" width="400px"></div> | ||
+ | <p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 4.</b> Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.</p> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_5.jpg" width="400px"></div> | ||
+ | <p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 5.</b> Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.</p> | ||
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
- | <h2>Comparison between | + | <h2>Comparison between the two system</h2> |
<p align="justify">As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).</p> | <p align="justify">As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).</p> | ||
- | <div><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_6.jpg"></div> | + | <div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_6.jpg" width="400px"></div> |
- | <p align="justify"> | + | <p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 6.</b> The number of B and C as iteration grows.</p> |
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
<p align="justify">From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.</p> | <p align="justify">From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.</p> |
Revision as of 15:18, 25 October 2012
A large scale simulation
The initial state is as following:
Edge of cube: 50 units
The amount of A: 2000
The amount of B: 0
The amount of C: 0
The amount of E1: 50
The amount of E2: 50
The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units
After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:
Scaffold | Non-scaffold | ||
---|---|---|---|
A (Substrate) | 1417 | 1470 | |
B (Intermediate) | 436 | 451 | |
C (Product) | 147 | 79 | |
E1 (Enzyme1) | 50 | 50 | |
E2 (Enzyme2) | 50 | 50 |
Fig 4. Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.
Fig 5. Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.
Comparison between the two system
As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).
Fig 6. The number of B and C as iteration grows.
From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.