Team:UCSF/Medal
From 2012.igem.org
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
<br> As reported by other teams in the Experience section, attempts to retrieve the Cambridge submitted part from the registry have failed. The restriction sites were not correct and we found that it failed as a PCR template for any of the four genes reported. Therefore, we obtained a template from another source (Dueber Lab, UC Berkeley) and are submitting the DNA for these three enzymes for use by future iGEM teams. | <br> As reported by other teams in the Experience section, attempts to retrieve the Cambridge submitted part from the registry have failed. The restriction sites were not correct and we found that it failed as a PCR template for any of the four genes reported. Therefore, we obtained a template from another source (Dueber Lab, UC Berkeley) and are submitting the DNA for these three enzymes for use by future iGEM teams. | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <regulartext> | ||
+ | Finally, we have made the extraction of violacein (<a href=http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K274002>BBa_K274002</a>) safer and more effective by showing that the pigment can be easily extracted with ethanol, rather than acetone or ethyl acetate, and that these samples are readily used in downstream analysis. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="rightcontent"> | <div id="rightcontent"> |
Revision as of 22:56, 3 October 2012
- Part: BBa_K726012
- Link: BBa_K726012
- Part: BBa_K726014
- Link: BBa_K726014
- Part: BBa_K726016
- Link: BBa_K726016
As reported by other teams in the Experience section, attempts to retrieve the Cambridge submitted part from the registry have failed. The restriction sites were not correct and we found that it failed as a PCR template for any of the four genes reported. Therefore, we obtained a template from another source (Dueber Lab, UC Berkeley) and are submitting the DNA for these three enzymes for use by future iGEM teams.