Team:Macquarie Australia/collaborations
From 2012.igem.org
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<li>OUC-China</li> | <li>OUC-China</li> | ||
<li>Panamá_INDICASAT</li> | <li>Panamá_INDICASAT</li> | ||
+ | <li>Paris Bettencourt</li> | ||
<li>Paris Saclay</li> | <li>Paris Saclay</li> | ||
<li>Peking University</li> | <li>Peking University</li> | ||
Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
<li>Stanford-Brown</li> | <li>Stanford-Brown</li> | ||
<li>SUSTC-Shenzhen-B</li> | <li>SUSTC-Shenzhen-B</li> | ||
- | + | </ul></td> | |
- | <td><ul><li>Trento</li> | + | <td><ul><li>Tec-Monterrey</li><li>Trento</li> |
<li>UBC iGEM 2012</li> | <li>UBC iGEM 2012</li> | ||
<li>UC_Chile</li> | <li>UC_Chile</li> |
Revision as of 12:35, 26 September 2012
Collaborations
Our work
Our team has a strong belief that the best science is performed by working in groups. In this manner, collaboration between groups is highly attractive to us. However, given some circumstances this is difficult for us to perform. We identified that the lateness of wiki updates was a significant problem and did not make collaborating easier. While the wikis are very open, we felt more could be done to improve the sharing between teams.
The Macquarie team wanted to be involved in collaborations, however- our geographical location makes this difficult. We still wanted to work with and contribute to the community. To meet this goal we wanted to survey the community. We wanted to see if other groups want to work together and what their view on the iGEM experience was.
Our survey consisted of only nine questions and was mainly interested in the individual's perspective of collaboration.
We would like the thank the following teams for being involved in our survey,
|
|
|
Our contributions
The Macquarie Team helped several other teams by completing their surveys. The teams we aided are listed below,
- TU München
- Trieste 2012
- University of British Columbia