Team:Freiburg/Project/Results
From 2012.igem.org
Pablinitus (Talk | contribs) (→The toolkit) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
- | The creation of a toolkit with 96 different parts not only means a lot of labwork but also a lot of organisational tasks, sequencing and analysis. We don't want to bore you with the 96 sequences of our finished biobricks, but we want to give you one example of a finished biobrick and highlight some of the interesting and important strips in its sequence. If you are interested in the other sequences, just have a look at our | + | The creation of a toolkit with 96 different parts not only means a lot of labwork but also a lot of organisational tasks, sequencing and analysis. We don't want to bore you with the 96 sequences of our finished biobricks, but we want to give you one example of a finished biobrick and highlight some of the interesting and important strips in its sequence. If you are interested in the other sequences, just have a look at our [[Team:Freiburg/Parts|Parts]] section and go to the registry of standard biological parts. |
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
- | In this sequence of our biobrick AA1 the main features of all our biobricks are highlighted. In yellow you can see the direpeat itself, the green parts are iGEM restriction sites (a requirement for all biobricks), the red, written sequence is part of the psb1C3 vector, the yellow part is the direpeat itself, the blue sequences are recognition sites for BsmB1 and the red boxes are the cutting sites of BsmB1. | + | In this sequence of our biobrick AA1 the main features of all our biobricks are highlighted. In yellow you can see the direpeat itself, the green parts are iGEM restriction sites (a requirement for all biobricks), the red, written sequence is part of the psb1C3 vector, the yellow part is the direpeat itself, the blue sequences are recognition sites for BsmB1 and the red boxes are the cutting sites of BsmB1. |
- | + | ||
==<span style="color:#2244AA">Creation of TAL sequences - Golden Gate Cloning - == | ==<span style="color:#2244AA">Creation of TAL sequences - Golden Gate Cloning - == |
Revision as of 14:51, 25 September 2012
Contents |
Results
The toolkit
The creation of a toolkit with 96 different parts not only means a lot of labwork but also a lot of organisational tasks, sequencing and analysis. We don't want to bore you with the 96 sequences of our finished biobricks, but we want to give you one example of a finished biobrick and highlight some of the interesting and important strips in its sequence. If you are interested in the other sequences, just have a look at our Parts section and go to the registry of standard biological parts.
In this sequence of our biobrick AA1 the main features of all our biobricks are highlighted. In yellow you can see the direpeat itself, the green parts are iGEM restriction sites (a requirement for all biobricks), the red, written sequence is part of the psb1C3 vector, the yellow part is the direpeat itself, the blue sequences are recognition sites for BsmB1 and the red boxes are the cutting sites of BsmB1.
Creation of TAL sequences - Golden Gate Cloning -
What's so great concerning our toolkit is not that it has 96 parts but that these parts are able to form fully functional TAL effectors. Now, to get from the toolbox to the finished TAL effector, you need a few things:six direpeats, one effector backbone, three enzymes and a PCR machine. If you throw all this together it's what is called Golden Gate Cloning (GGC). In this part we want to show you the results of our trials with the finished biobricks and the sequencing of built TAL effector constructs.
Activation of transcription
As you can see in the graph we were able to demonstrate a high increase in SEAP activity compared to the control samples and the co-transfection of TAL and SEAP plasmids (++). The graph shows the average of three biological replicates with its standard deviation. In the next table we did a ttest to prove the statistical significance, the yellow highlighted fields are the p-values for our double transfections. As you can see they are clearly below a p-value of 0,05 which demonstrates their statistical significance.